Quackpot Baratz Goes On Trial
Question:
And, I recevied it, too, before I lost the old Hotmail account.
Like all spam, I have a copy in my archives. (And, let me tell you, the only thing that makes those archives possible is the fact that hard drive capacity increases even faster than spam!) — | Microsoft: "A reputation for releasing inferior software will make | | it more difficult for a software vendor to induce customers to pay | | for new products or new versions of existing products." | end
Response:
Since Baratz is one of the Barrett team, that automatically makes him OK and you aren’t interested in WHY he is going to court. Neither were you. He was in court as an expert witness and was being cross examined, not tried for anything, either civil or criminal. Of course, you just wanted to trash him, so you posted Bolen’s diatribe without even bothering to understand it. How do I know you did not under stand it? Look at the subject of this thread, and then read the diatribe. See how Bolen does mention that Baratz will be cross examined.
You’re leaping to assumptions here. It’s quite possible that Jan understood what was going on and chose her subject line deliberately. Jan? Did you understand what Bolen wrote? — | Microsoft: "A reputation for releasing inferior software will make | | it more difficult for a software vendor to induce customers to pay | | for new products or new versions of existing products." | end
Response:
- Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – The original expert witness was going to be Dr John Renner, but unfortunately he died. For Bolen to claim that Dr Baratz is "on trial" is what is known in technical terms as "a lie". Well if he did indeed, then shame on him!! Yes he did: that was the SUBJECT LINE of the email. I got one too.
And? Still waiting for confirmation of what Peter stated. You aren’t?? You just believe anything Peter states without question?? However, Peter, I can’t completely trust you with the truth either. Where did you get your information? That was the SUBJECT LINE of the email. I got one too.
Tsu And? However, Peter, I can’t completely trust you with the truth either. Where did you get your information?
Still waiting for confirmation of what Peter stated. You aren’t?? You just believe anything Peter states without question?? Jan
Response:
- Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – As I said, he is scum, and there are only one or two people on this list who would feel this latest bit of his invective is worthy of repetition.. You know who they are. Peter Moran The irony is the one who did so is always trumpeting the evil of personal bashing or trashing. I guess all is fair when it is someone you agree with. T Once again, as usual, you have no idea what you are talking about. What you have proven is YOU are guilty of exactly what you accuse me of. As long a Baratz is a part of the Barrett team, you don’t even want to know WHY he is going to court. As for Peter Moran, (who posted this to the dental group also) Here is his history. Do tell us Tony, do you see any of the things Peter couldn’t?? (watch for no reply from Tony, who is a dentist and a member of ye good ole boy and girl club) Here is a reply for Jan… I have you blocked as you are a waste of time.
Uh huh. Translation: I refuse to answer, it would be a transgression to the good ole boy and girl club. This is a good example of why.
Sure it is!! This wasn’t abot Peter..
Sure it was, it was about his post. .it was about YOU passing along a personal attack on someone you fucking hypocrite.
Oh my,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, Do not once again show us your professional behavior Tony! Do I "bash" you…sure I do. You deserve it.
Translation: Jan posts the risks of mercury amalgams. It upsets my belief system. You, on the other hand, constantly call other out for doing so,
I do indeed call peoples’ lies and their deliberate bashing, plus vulgar language. yet when it works to your benefit, you jump right on the same bandwagon
What is working to my benefit?? That, is what is called being a hypocrite.
Well, no that is an opinion. I am not a member of any good old boy club.
Now, there is a whopper. As one of the dentists who LIES himself, he also LIES for his buddies. I have the knowledge to tell truth from fiction
Sure you do. You have clearly demonstrated you do not. T
What are you doing over here anyway Tony???? Deal with this truth, and get past the fiction of the safety of amalgams. http://www.amalgam.org./ http://www.nap.edu/books/0309071402/html/ http://www.epa.gov/ost/criteria/methylmercury/ http://www.epa.gov/ost/criteria/methylmercury/ http://ehpnet1.niehs.nih.gov/docs/1996/Suppl-2/watanabe.html http://www.health.state.mn.us/divs/eh/esa/hra/fishfact/methylme.html http://sofia.usgs.gov/projects/bact_demeth/ http://www.ulaval.ca/vrr/rech/Proj/69389.html http://www.cspinet.org/foodsafety/methylmerc_limit.html http://www.altcorp.com/amalgam.htm http://www.algonet.se/~leif/FUSCIFCT.html http://www.asomat.com/mercury/Relevant-facts-about-amalgam.htm http://ehpnet1.niehs.nih.gov/docs/1999/107p587-591grandjean/abstract…. http://www.academyfornaturalhealth.com/amalgamfill.htm http://www.bioprobe.com/reviews.asp?review_id=11 http://www.skeptics.com.au/features/weird/media/mw-dentalamalgam.htm http://www.geocities.com/toothk/breiner.html http://emporium.turnpike.net/P/PDHA/mercury/asr.htm http://www.sevaonline.com/English/RechUK.htm http://www.iadr-dentalfaculty.org/plenary/plenary2/00000040.htm http://www.whale.to/d/wantling.htm http://www.cco.net/~trufax/mercury/merc1.html http://www.u-net.com/four-d/mercury.htm http://www.msnbc.com/news/599087.asp#BODY http://www.yourhealthbase.com/amalgams.html http://www.holisticdental.org/index.html http://home.online.no/~reiersol/classact.htm http://www.icnr.securesites.com/hhnewsl.html http://www.cfsn.com/ADArebut.html http://www.thorne.com/townsend/oct/mercury.html http://vest.gu.se/~bosse/yrBOF93a.html http://www.toxicteeth.net http://www.lichtenberg.dk/symptoms_before_and_after_proper.htm http://bcn.net/~stoll/archives/mercury/15063.html http://www.web-light.nl/AMALGAM/amalgam.html http://www.web-light.nl/AMALGAM/amalgam.html http://www.lef.org/magazine/mag2001/may2001_report_mercury_1.html http://www.web-light.nl/AMALGAM/EN/enmframe.html http://www.zipworld.com.au/~rgammal/AmalgamFrameSet.htm http://www.zipworld.com.au/~rgammal/AmalgamFrameSet.htm http://www.selene.com/healthlink/amalgam.html http://www.earthtym.net/merc-tox.htm http://www.asomat.com./ http://www.geocities.com/pamshelpline/mercuryfillings.htm http://ehis.niehs.nih.gov/topic/heavymetal.html http://www.gumshield.com/history/dental_fill.html http://www.heart-disease-bypass-surgery.com/data/articles/63.htm http://www.u-net.com/four-d/cfs.htm http://www.health.gov/environment/amalgam1/appendixIII.htm http://www.lichtenberg.dk/experience_after_amalgam_removal.htm http://www.positivehealth.com/permit/Articles/Dentistry/burrow45.htm http://www.notdoctors.com/mercfill.html http://www.whale.to/d/cancer.html http://www.ephca.com/ci&cme.htm http://www.cco.net/~trufax/reports/merceff.html http://www.holisticmed.com/dental/amalgam/child.html http://www.geocities.com/toothk/bernieref1.html http://www.talkinternational.com/TTCHPTR9.htm http://www.bioprobe.com/faq.asp http://www.mercury-free.com/ http://www.home.earthlink.net/~berniew1/periodon.html http://www.zipworld.com.au/~rgammal/Are_Dentist_Really_Healthy.html http://www.medical library.net/specialties/framer.html?/specialties/_biological_and_mercury_f ree_dentistry.html http://www.home.earthlink.net/~berniew1/indexa.html http://www.ariplex.com/ama/amatalbo.htm http://www.ariplex.com/ama/amatalbo.htm http://www.bhoffcomp.com/coping/amalgam.html http://www.amalgam.ukgo.com/talbot82.htm
Response:
- Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – The original expert witness was going to be Dr John Renner, but unfortunately he died. For Bolen to claim that Dr Baratz is "on trial" is what is known in technical terms as "a lie". Well if he did indeed, then shame on him!! Yes he did: that was the SUBJECT LINE of the email. I got one too. And? Still waiting for confirmation of what Peter stated. You aren’t?? You just believe anything Peter states without question?? However, Peter, I can’t completely trust you with the truth either. Where did you get your information? That was the SUBJECT LINE of the email. I got one too. Tsu And? However, Peter, I can’t completely trust you with the truth either. Where did you get your information? Still waiting for confirmation of what Peter stated. You aren’t?? You just believe anything Peter states without question??
Jan, the confirmation of what Peter said is in Bolen’s article. From Bolen’s original: "The attorney for Kadile in the Wisconsin case, Frank Recker, is prepared. He’s had the use of a Private Investigator, expert researchers, competent Doctors and Scientists, other attorneys who have defeated Baratz, other cases and depositions, mental health professionals, and MY files. On July 14th, 15th, and 16th, little Bobbie gets *cross-examined* ONLY on his credibility. Believe me, his mental health will be an issue." Note that he is specifically referring to the Kadile case, where Kadile is the defendant, not Baratz. Thus the subject line is a lie. If it came from Bolen, then you know who lied.
Response:
- Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – Since Baratz is one of the Barrett team, that automatically makes him OK and you aren’t interested in WHY he is going to court. Neither were you. He was in court as an expert witness and was being cross examined, not tried for anything, either civil or criminal. Of course, you just wanted to trash him, so you posted Bolen’s diatribe without even bothering to understand it. How do I know you did not under stand it? Look at the subject of this thread, and then read the diatribe. See how Bolen does mention that Baratz will be cross examined. You’re leaping to assumptions here. It’s quite possible that Jan understood what was going on and chose her subject line deliberately. Jan? Did you understand what Bolen wrote?
Bolen’s hyperbole probably got in her way.
Response:
Old story Jan ….. No one here is interested ….. Really … .this is the dental newsgroup!
– Joel M. Eichen, D.D.S. Philadelphia PA www.phillyducks.com We
