Pillar Implant Procedure – 90 day sleep study results for your review
Question:
Tom Devlin wrote:
: Many of us experience very vivid, and frequently disturbing, dreams : after getting our apnea treated, these tend to go away as we get used : to dreaming again. i never stopped dreaming. i had very vivid dreams before the apnea, and if anything i’m having fewer dreams that i remember now. does this make me weirder than i already thought i was? — deb not that that has anything to do with the topic
Response:
sine nomine <ll…@drizzle.com> wrote: >: Many of us experience very vivid, and frequently disturbing, dreams >: after getting our apnea treated, these tend to go away as we get used >: to dreaming again. >i never stopped dreaming. i had very vivid dreams before the apnea, >and if anything i’m having fewer dreams that i remember now. does this >make me weirder than i already thought i was?
Not everybody quits dreaming before treatment. I’d guess that your CPAP is keeping your apneas from awakening you during your dreams. This is a Very Good Thing. <g> Tom
Response:
On 27 Feb 2005 13:57:39 -0800, Sleepy Stoboy wrote in response to my comments: >Very good point on the FSA. I always forget that, even though I signed >up for one this year.
I’m an absolute FSA believer although I’m fairly predictable. (Make that "semi-predictable." I didn’t anticipate my doctor deciding to optimize my blood pressure meds by 30-day trials or hypothyroidism getting to the point where I needed Synthroid and frequent TSH checks.) >As far as being a "few fries short of a happy meal", IMHO, the UPPP is >missing the burger and shake as well.
But it still has the yummy styrofoam clamshell. <wink> >The clinical studies are just brutal on these procedures and their >effectiveness, and they have hurt the credibility of current and >future procedures.
Surgical correction of OSA has to deal with annoying little things like the effects of computational fluid dynamics. There’s very little you can do to make the offending areas stop collapsing short of implanting a length of medical-grade furnace duct… and that would make it very hard to go through the metal detectors at the airport. >My guess is that the rear of tongue is killing my supine >measurements, and no amount of stiffening in my palate was >going to improve that totally.
NASA has found zero-G helps a lot. (One of the medical studies that they have done involved giving astronauts polysomnograms on Earth and on-orbit to see how the sleep structure changes.) But at $10,000 a pound, they’re not going to launch any Hoover Heads if they can help it.
Response:
Thanks Kate, I sure hope so. But it is what it is with this condition… I’ve found the dental device to be very comfortable- but only after wearing it for a few weeks. There has been an adjustment period, but your jaw seems to get used to the stretch after awhile. I end up waking up surprised that I have no discomfort with it. That being said, I’m on about day 30. Long term study on these devices is non-existent, that I’ve found. I’m aware that there are TMJ concerns. I’m hoping more information surfaces if I’m still using it in year 3 or year 4…
Response:
oh…….. you answered my next question……… i have TMJ issues too with the sleep guard that i used………… thank you for your honesty "Sleepy Stoboy" <jbog…@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:1109542376.081222.321350@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com… – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -> Thanks Kate, I sure hope so. But it is what it is with this > condition… > I’ve found the dental device to be very comfortable- but only after > wearing it for a few weeks. There has been an adjustment period, but > your jaw seems to get used to the stretch after awhile. I end up > waking up surprised that I have no discomfort with it. > That being said, I’m on about day 30. Long term study on these devices > is non-existent, that I’ve found. I’m aware that there are TMJ > concerns. I’m hoping more information surfaces if I’m still using it > in year 3 or year 4…
Response:
Sleepy Stoboy wrote: > Thanks for the support. I agree on being zealous. Ultimately, people > need as much hard data as they can get. Anecdotal information, while > interesting, isn’t enough to make a serious medical decision on.
I haven’t done as much research in recent years as I did starting in 2000. At that time it appeared to me that it was extremely difficult to find REALLY useful hard data about many of the aspects of OSA/CA. Don’t know how it is today. After I had been on CPAP for a couple months, I discovered that the air was exiting my lips, resulting in dry mouth and feeling like crap again. I wanted to know more about why I had OSA and, in particular, why I was suddenly opening my jaw or lips. I learned about airway endoscopies here, on ASSD, primarily from Mike and Bear (for which I will always be grateful), both of which had had unsuccessful UPPPs. I first went to an ENT, which was a waste of time. I hadn’t asked if he had the equipment… just expected (wrongly) that he did. Then I went to a maxillo facial surgeon and got my endoscopy. Two matters of interest here. Whereas he said that I had a big tongue, uvula, etc. and told me of the various surgeries, he indicated that he no longer did UPPPs because of the low success rate. The other matter was that although he seemed to push surgery during my visit, he sensed that I was not interested based on what he had seen in the endoscopy, and, in his written report to my referring internist, didn’t mention any need for any kind of surgery. Perhaps he was already able to afford to send his kids to college <wry grin>. Curious to know history of your weight and neck size. > Yeah, on the dreams, it’s more of an observation than anything that > would necessarily pertain to better health. I have heard that if you > are recollecting your dreams that you may be waking during REM sleep, > thus being interrupted. It was just a strange side effect to suddenly > dream again. Do you think there is some correlation between RDI levels > and dreams? REM RDI levels and dreams?
I’ve never given a thought to either of your questions; however, if you are getting REM sleep, and thus dreaming, the higher the RDI, the more often your ’sleep’ will be interrupted, so it seems that the potential for recalling more dreams would be there. – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -> Something seemed to pull a > trigger here. > As for things continuing to go well, I’m mildly optimistic. Everyone > has seen so many UPPP regressions, that that is top of mind. But I > think the fact that I’m not cutting away tissue only to watch scar > tissue accumulate where there once was palate, will be the difference. > I’m simply stiffening previously floppy tissue. > I’ll continue to provide updates. There may be some who want to > consider a pillar/TAP combo as a treatment plan.
Response:
"Sleepy Stoboy" <jbog…@comcast.net> wrote: >Yeah, on the dreams, it’s more of an observation than anything that >would necessarily pertain to better health. I have heard that if you >are recollecting your dreams that you may be waking during REM sleep, >thus being interrupted. It was just a strange side effect to suddenly >dream again. Do you think there is some correlation between RDI levels >and dreams? REM RDI levels and dreams? Something seemed to pull a >trigger here.
There seem to be a couple of things happening here…. Many of us experience very vivid, and frequently disturbing, dreams after getting our apnea treated, these tend to go away as we get used to dreaming again. OTOH, most people don’t remember their dreams unless they’re awakened during one. Apneic events will often do this, I can tell when my pressure needs increasing by the number of dreams I seem to have. (I’m dreaming every night, but won’t normally be aware of them.) >I’ll continue to provide updates. There may be some who want to >consider a pillar/TAP combo as a treatment plan.
Please do… We really need your long term reports. Tom
Response:
Very good point on the FSA. I always forget that, even though I signed up for one this year. As far as being a "few fries short of a happy meal", IMHO, the UPPP is missing the burger and shake as well. The clinical studies are just brutal on these procedures and their effectiveness, and they have hurt the credibility of current and future procedures. Agree on the REM and supine RDI improvement. I moved the needle on my stage 2 sleep substantially, but didn’t pick up any additional deep wave sleep, which is what I ultimately need as well. My guess is that the rear of tongue is killing my supine measurements, and no amount of stiffening in my palate was going to improve that totally.
Response:
Definitely. My hope is that my post TAP sleep study will show that this has been addressed by that point. But if not, I’ll be going to CPAP. The clinical studies I’ve read on TAP indicate very close oxygen sat levels compared to CPAP (about 1 percentage point less for TAP).
Response:
Thanks for the support. I agree on being zealous. Ultimately, people need as much hard data as they can get. Anecdotal information, while interesting, isn’t enough to make a serious medical decision on. Yeah, on the dreams, it’s more of an observation than anything that would necessarily pertain to better health. I have heard that if you are recollecting your dreams that you may be waking during REM sleep, thus being interrupted. It was just a strange side effect to suddenly dream again. Do you think there is some correlation between RDI levels and dreams? REM RDI levels and dreams? Something seemed to pull a trigger here. As for things continuing to go well, I’m mildly optimistic. Everyone has seen so many UPPP regressions, that that is top of mind. But I think the fact that I’m not cutting away tissue only to watch scar tissue accumulate where there once was palate, will be the difference. I’m simply stiffening previously floppy tissue. I’ll continue to provide updates. There may be some who want to consider a pillar/TAP combo as a treatment plan.
Response:
- Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -Sleepy Stoboy wrote: > About 3 months ago, I posted that I had undergone the pillar implant > procedure and reported that I was sleeping better. There were a couple > of well wishers in the crowd, but a few of you asked for 90 day sleep > study results to prove that the procedure was effective. I thought I > would post the pre and post sleep study results for your review. > Pre-Pillar (9/15/2004) > – RDI of 36 > – Low oxygen point of 86.5% > – REM Sleep % = 11% > – Sleep Efficiency = 70% > – Supine Apnea RDI = 67 > – REM RDI = 20 > Post-Pillar (2/7/2005) > – RDI of 18 > – Low oxygen point of 89% > – REM Sleep % = 22% > – Sleep Efficiency = 95% > – Supine Apnea RDI = 41 > – REM RDI = 17 > On a qualitative side, I noticed a significant improvement in my sleep > after about 3 weeks. I went from not dreaming at all to having dreams > again. And I went from several (15+) awakenings that I was aware of > per night to around 3-4. > After the 90 day period, I knew that the treatment had not resolved all > of the apneas, so I was fitted for a TAP dental appliance. I have now > used that appliance for about 4 weeks, and it has been terrific. After > 4 weeks of adjustments, I am now close to sleeping uninterrupted > throughout the night. I plan on having another sleep study done at the > end of the year to make any additional adjustments to resolve any > additional apneas that may be occurring. > Let me know if you have any questions regarding pillar or TAP. While > not a "cure" for me, it did resolve the palatal portion of my blockage, > and the TAP is now effectively addressing the rear of tongue blockage > that I have. My own personal suggestion is that anyone interested with > an RDI of 20 or less should get a consultation with an ENT on this > procedure, as a significant reduction in your case could bring you to > an acceptable RDI without further treatment. Those in the moderate > range (20-40) may find that this works as part of a one-two punch, > either with another treatment option or one of the surgeries that > addresses tongue base (GA, hyoid, repose, etc.). Some may find that it > lowers their current CPAP pressure. > Cost is an issue, as most insurance companies are not covering this. > With the FDA approval, some may come over in the next year or two. > For those of you who are determinedly anti-surgery or just against the > concept of early adopting newer procedures, I’m not looking to incite a > 40-post flame war here. Your treatment decisions are your own and > should be respected. However there is probably a group of others who > are either curioius or actively interested. While hardly a clinical > study, this pre and post data is similar to those who participated in > the 50-person clinical study Restore Medical conducted earlier last > year. If you’re interested, a consultation with an ENT is critical to > determine if you are a candidate (long palate) for the procedure. > Thanks in advance for keeping this discussion respectful.
I’d like to add my thanks to you for posting this information. Although I was not/am not familiar with the Pillar implant procedure, IIRC (and I may not), I think I commented on a number of side effects that I had researched for TAP. However, I try to keep track of all sides of this stuff, and am adding your post to my local database. Cost was one of the things that entered into my decision. Medicare will not pay for TAP, even when recommended/prescribed by my neurologist certified sleep doctor. Please continue to take a few minutes to keep us informed. And thanks for your keeping this discussion respectful. Sometimes the desire to help people/keep newbies from experiencing our own problems (past and present), causes us to become quite zealous. Reading all the new posts and trying to help those that we can, can become an awesome task, particularly by email/newsposts, especially after 3 years (I took 2004 off <g>). I sincerely hope that things continue to go well for you. BTW, with regard to dreaming, there has been a good deal of discussion here about whether it is ‘good’ or ‘bad’ to be aware of your dreams. Dreaming and recalling one’s dreams are two different matters. That is, if one does not have any kind of sleep disorder, one will dream. Dreams are good. They are required. However it is the understanding of some of us that dreams are only recalled if one awakens during the dream or very shortly after a dream ends. Since dreams occur during REM sleep, someone who never recalls a dream probably is not getting REM sleep. If one recalls a lot of dreams, he is apparently getting REM sleep. But the question becomes, is the person awaking from apneas, and/or other sleep disorders and recalling the dreams. Some of us judge the quality of our sleep based on whether we recall any dreams. For me, no recollection of dreams normally results in a perfect day. The more dreams I recall, the crappier I may feel that following day.
Response:
"Sleepy Stoboy" <jbog…@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:1109526607.069962.135400@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com… – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -> About 3 months ago, I posted that I had undergone the pillar implant > procedure and reported that I was sleeping better. There were a couple > of well wishers in the crowd, but a few of you asked for 90 day sleep > study results to prove that the procedure was effective. I thought I > would post the pre and post sleep study results for your review. > Pre-Pillar (9/15/2004) > – RDI of 36 > – Low oxygen point of 86.5% > – REM Sleep % = 11% > – Sleep Efficiency = 70% > – Supine Apnea RDI = 67 > – REM RDI = 20 > Post-Pillar (2/7/2005) > – RDI of 18 > – Low oxygen point of 89% > – REM Sleep % = 22% > – Sleep Efficiency = 95% > – Supine Apnea RDI = 41 > – REM RDI = 17 > On a qualitative side, I noticed a significant improvement in my sleep > after about 3 weeks. I went from not dreaming at all to having dreams > again. And I went from several (15+) awakenings that I was aware of > per night to around 3-4. > After the 90 day period, I knew that the treatment had not resolved all > of the apneas, so I was fitted for a TAP dental appliance. I have now > used that appliance for about 4 weeks, and it has been terrific. After > 4 weeks of adjustments, I am now close to sleeping uninterrupted > throughout the night. I plan on having another sleep study done at the > end of the year to make any additional adjustments to resolve any > additional apneas that may be occurring. > Let me know if you have any questions regarding pillar or TAP. While > not a "cure" for me, it did resolve the palatal portion of my blockage, > and the TAP is now effectively addressing the rear of tongue blockage > that I have. My own personal suggestion is that anyone under an RDI of > 20 should get a consultation with an ENT on this procedure, as a > significant reduction in your case could bring you to an acceptable RDI > without further treatment. Those in the moderate range (20-40) may > find that this works as part of a one-two punch, either with another > treatment option or one of the surgeries that addresses tongue base > (GA, hyoid, repose, etc.). Some may find that it lowers their current > CPAP pressure. > Cost is an issue, as most insurance companies are not covering this. > With the FDA approval, some may come over in the next year or two. > For those of you who are determinedly anti-surgery or just against the > concept of early adopting newer procedures, I’m not looking to incite a > 40-post flame war here. Your treatment decisions are your own and > should be respected. However there is probably a group of others who > are either curioius or actively interested. While hardly a clinical > study, this pre and post data is similar to those who participated in > the 50-person clinical study Restore Medical conducted earlier last > year. If you’re interested, a consultation with an ENT is critical to > determine if you are a candidate (long palate) for the procedure. > Thanks in advance for keeping this discussion respectful.
Great to see a positive result. Personally, while there is an evident improvement the 89% low oxygen point might be of concern (usually anything below 95% needs attention of some type) and would be worth mentioning on your next visit to your sleep specialist. Please keep us informed. Dan.
Response:
thank you very much for your update on this new procedure i hope the addition of the splint resolves your sleep apnea to the degree you don’t need anymore treatment question about the splint……….. is it uncomfortable to wear?? i had a paranoia over the splint and went for the CPAP instead………… just my phobia………. thanks kate "Sleepy Stoboy" <jbog…@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:1109525738.735904.258400@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com… – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -> About 3 months ago, I posted that I had undergone the pillar implant > procedure and reported that I was sleeping better. There were a couple > of well wishers in the crowd, but a few of you asked for 90 day sleep > study results to prove that the procedure was effective. I thought I > would post the pre and post sleep study results for your review. > Pre-Pillar (9/15/2004) > – RDI of 36 > – Low oxygen point of 86.5% > – REM Sleep % = 11% > – Sleep Efficiency = 70% > – Supine Apnea RDI = 67 > – REM RDI = 20 > Post-Pillar (2/7/2005) > – RDI of 18 > – Low oxygen point of 89% > – REM Sleep % = 22% > – Sleep Efficiency = 95% > – Supine Apnea RDI = 41 > – REM RDI = 17 > On a qualitative side, I noticed a significant improvement in my sleep > after about 3 weeks. I went from not dreaming at all to having dreams > again. And I went from several (15+) awakenings that I was aware of > per night to around 3-4. > After the 90 day period, I knew that the treatment had not resolved all > of the apneas, so I was fitted for a TAP dental appliance. I have now > used that appliance for about 4 weeks, and it has been terrific. After > 4 weeks of adjustments, I am now close to sleeping uninterrupted > throughout the night. I plan on having another sleep study done at the > end of the year to make any additional adjustments to resolve any > additional apneas that may be occurring. > Let me know if you have any questions regarding pillar or TAP. While > not a "cure" for me, it did resolve the palatal portion of my blockage, > and the TAP is now effectively addressing the rear of tongue blockage > that I have. My own personal suggestion is that anyone interested with > an RDI of 20 or less should get a consultation with an ENT on this > procedure, as a significant reduction in your case could bring you to > an acceptable RDI without further treatment. Those in the moderate > range (20-40) may find that this works as part of a one-two punch, > either with another treatment option or one of the surgeries that > addresses tongue base (GA, hyoid, repose, etc.). Some may find that it > lowers their current CPAP pressure. > Cost is an issue, as most insurance companies are not covering this. > With the FDA approval, some may come over in the next year or two. > For those of you who are determinedly anti-surgery or just against the > concept of early adopting newer procedures, I’m not looking to incite a > 40-post flame war here. Your treatment decisions are your own and > should be respected. However there is probably a group of others who > are either curioius or actively interested. While hardly a clinical > study, this pre and post data is similar to those who participated in > the 50-person clinical study Restore Medical conducted earlier last > year. If you’re interested, a consultation with an ENT is critical to > determine if you are a candidate (long palate) for the procedure. > Thanks in advance for keeping this discussion respectful.
Response:
i had to wear a splint for grinding my teeth at night every morning i had to find where did the splint go i never did adjust to that splint!! when i was diagnosed with sleep apnea i was given a choice of CPAP versus the splint for it………….. i told them NO WAY can i do a splint. i’ve been there and done that……….. to no avail……… CPAP would be the way i’d have to go now you know why i was so stubborn about getting used to the CPAP machine……….. the other threat was a splint!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! sigh "Charlie Perrin" <c.l.perrin@SPAMBOTS_DIEatt.net> wrote in message
news:0f5421h7hn9d93d1knullqk1q54ejcj5e5@4ax.com… – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -> On Sun, 27 Feb 2005 11:34:08 -0700, Tiger Lily wrote: > >question about the splint……….. is it uncomfortable to wear?? i > >had a paranoia over the splint and went for the CPAP > >instead………… just my phobia………. > The difference between a CPAP and a TAP if either would work for you > is that you get to choose your favorite poison. <wink>
Response:
About 3 months ago, I posted that I had undergone the pillar implant procedure and reported that I was sleeping better. There were a couple of well wishers in the crowd, but a few of you asked for 90 day sleep study results to prove that the procedure was effective. I thought I would post the pre and post sleep study results for your review. Pre-Pillar (9/15/2004) – RDI of 36 – Low oxygen point of 86.5% – REM Sleep % = 11% – Sleep Efficiency = 70% – Supine Apnea RDI = 67 – REM RDI = 20 Post-Pillar (2/7/2005) – RDI of 18 – Low oxygen point of 89% – REM Sleep % = 22% – Sleep Efficiency = 95% – Supine Apnea RDI = 41 – REM RDI = 17 On a qualitative side, I noticed a significant improvement in my sleep after about 3 weeks. I went from not dreaming at all to having dreams again. And I went from several (15+) awakenings that I was aware of per night to around 3-4. After the 90 day period, I knew that the treatment had not resolved all of the apneas, so I was fitted for a TAP dental appliance. I have now used that appliance for about 4 weeks, and it has been terrific. After 4 weeks of adjustments, I am now close to sleeping uninterrupted throughout the night. I plan on having another sleep study done at the end of the year to make any additional adjustments to resolve any additional apneas that may be occurring. Let me know if you have any questions regarding pillar or TAP. While not a "cure" for me, it did resolve the palatal portion of my blockage, and the TAP is now effectively addressing the rear of tongue blockage that I have. My own personal suggestion is that anyone interested with an RDI of 20 or less should get a consultation with an ENT on this procedure, as a significant reduction in your case could bring you to an acceptable RDI without further treatment. Those in the moderate range (20-40) may find that this works as part of a one-two punch, either with another treatment option or one of the surgeries that addresses tongue base (GA, hyoid, repose, etc.). Some may find that it lowers their current CPAP pressure. Cost is an issue, as most insurance companies are not covering this. With the FDA approval, some may come over in the next year or two. For those of you who are determinedly anti-surgery or just against the concept of early adopting newer procedures, I’m not looking to incite a 40-post flame war here. Your treatment decisions are your own and should be respected. However there is probably a group of others who are either curioius or actively interested. While hardly a clinical study, this pre and post data is similar to those who participated in the 50-person clinical study Restore Medical conducted earlier last year. If you’re interested, a consultation with an ENT is critical to determine if you are a candidate (long palate) for the procedure. Thanks in advance for keeping this discussion respectful.
Response:
On 27 Feb 2005 09:50:07 -0800, Sleepy Stoboy wrote: >About 3 months ago, I posted that I had undergone the pillar implant >procedure and reported that I was sleeping better. There were a couple >of well wishers in the crowd, but a few of you asked for 90 day sleep >study results to prove that the procedure was effective. >Pre-Pillar (9/15/2004) >- RDI of 36 >- Supine Apnea RDI = 67 >- REM RDI = 20 >Post-Pillar (2/7/2005) >- RDI of 18 >- Supine Apnea RDI = 41 >- REM RDI = 17
In your case, you’ve gotten (overall) the 50% improvement that 50% of people get from UPPP…. without the nasty recovery period of UPPP. However, both supine and REM RDI show less than 50% improvement but they’re the harder times to control OSA. >After the 90 day period, I knew that the treatment had not resolved all >of the apneas, so I was fitted for a TAP dental appliance. I have now >used that appliance for about 4 weeks, and it has been terrific.
Multiple attacks at all the targets of opportunity can and do work. >Cost is an issue, as most insurance companies are not covering this.
It’ll help as soon as HCPCS gets a distinct procedure code for it. >With the FDA approval, some may come over in the next year or two.
I think somebody mentioned $800, may have been you. On the other hand, if there’s somebody who is a good Pillar candidate and they have a Section 125 ("Flexible Spending Account") plan at work, I would expect the FSA would let you pay for it pre-tax if you planned to have the money set up at the right time. And FSA has an extra whammy in the tax department, FSA funds are taken out pre-FICA, so that adds another 7% of savings. The IRS rules for what they allow a FSA to cover are fairly liberal: in summary, anything that treats a specific health problem that isn’t illegal or solely cosmetic surgery. For example, FSA’s pay for LASIK. On the other hand, the great majority of health insurance plans that cover LASIK are for companies that make LASIK hardware… and the insurance company gets told point-blank to cover the procedure. >For those of you who are determinedly anti-surgery or just against the >concept of early adopting newer procedures, I’m not looking to incite a >40-post flame war here. Your treatment decisions are your own and >should be respected. However there is probably a group of others who >are either curioius or actively interested.
I’m always curious in seeing how the newer procedures work… but surgery has so far been a "few fries short of a Happy Meal" for OSA treatment, barring a blatant structural deformity.
Response:
On Sun, 27 Feb 2005 11:34:08 -0700, Tiger Lily wrote: >question about the splint……….. is it uncomfortable to wear?? i >had a paranoia over the splint and went for the CPAP >instead………… just my phobia……….
The difference between a CPAP and a TAP if either would work for you is that you get to choose your favorite poison. <wink>
Response:
- Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -Sleepy Stoboy wrote: > About 3 months ago, I posted that I had undergone the > pillar implant procedure and reported that I was sleeping > better. There were a couple of well wishers in the > crowd, but a few of you asked for 90 day sleep study > results to prove that the procedure was effective. I > thought I would post the pre and post sleep study results > for your review. > Pre-Pillar (9/15/2004) > – RDI of 36 > – Low oxygen point of 86.5% > – REM Sleep % = 11% > – Sleep Efficiency = 70% > – Supine Apnea RDI = 67 > – REM RDI = 20 > Post-Pillar (2/7/2005) > – RDI of 18 > – Low oxygen point of 89% > – REM Sleep % = 22% > – Sleep Efficiency = 95% > – Supine Apnea RDI = 41 > – REM RDI = 17 > On a qualitative side, I noticed a significant > improvement in my sleep after about 3 weeks. I went from > not dreaming at all to having dreams again. And I went > from several (15+) awakenings that I was aware of per > night to around 3-4. > After the 90 day period, I knew that the treatment had > not resolved all of the apneas, so I was fitted for a TAP > dental appliance. I have now used that appliance for > about 4 weeks, and it has been terrific. After 4 weeks > of adjustments, I am now close to sleeping uninterrupted > throughout the night. I plan on having another sleep > study done at the end of the year to make any additional > adjustments to resolve any additional apneas that may be > occurring. > Let me know if you have any questions regarding pillar or > TAP. While not a "cure" for me, it did resolve the > palatal portion of my blockage, and the TAP is now > effectively addressing the rear of tongue blockage that I > have. My own personal suggestion is that anyone > interested with an RDI of 20 or less should get a > consultation with an ENT on this procedure, as a > significant reduction in your case could bring you to an > acceptable RDI without further treatment. Those in the > moderate range (20-40) may find that this works as part > of a one-two punch, either with another treatment option > or one of the surgeries that addresses tongue base (GA, > hyoid, repose, etc.). Some may find that it lowers their > current CPAP pressure. > Cost is an issue, as most insurance companies are not > covering this. With the FDA approval, some may come over > in the next year or two. > For those of you who are determinedly anti-surgery or > just against the concept of early adopting newer > procedures, I’m not looking to incite a 40-post flame war > here. Your treatment decisions are your own and should > be respected. However there is probably a group of > others who are either curioius or actively interested. > While hardly a clinical study, this pre and post data is > similar to those who participated in the 50-person > clinical study Restore Medical conducted earlier last > year. If you’re interested, a consultation with an ENT > is critical to determine if you are a candidate (long > palate) for the procedure.
I would hope that everyone is interested in your results. Thanks for posting them along with your subjective feelings and experience. I can only hope that you will continue to post these on an ongoing basis. -Quick