Comparison of ResMed Autoset Spirit and Puritan Bennett 420E flow generators
Question:
Thanks Andy,that was very useful ,I think you’ve covered just about everything.It’s great to get feedback from people who actually use the machines and know what to look for and what comparisons to make "Andy Hall" <an…@hall.nospam> wrote in message
news:e1ch2158bi4fj090suorph49ubm5n28l26@4ax.com… – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -> I’ve been using my ResMed Autoset Spirit autotitrating flow generator > for approximately two years and have had very good results with it. > For me, it has done exactly what the manufacturers claim as well as > what is suggested by clinical studies. I have uncomplicated OSA > with no other respiratory or other sleep disorders. Since I am in > the UK and using private sector healthcare, diagnosis and > consultations are paid for by insurance, but equipment has to be paid > for by the patient. For the original choice, I took a lot of care > over selection of the type of machine, based on my own research as > well as discussion with the specialist. I also looked carefully at > manufacturer support of product and patient. > For the choice of first machine, ResMed’s Autoset Spirit met all of > the criteria and I’ve been very pleased with the choice. In the UK > public sector, equipment is supplied and supported via the clinic with > what can be quite a variable waiting period. In the private sector, > the patient can work directly with the manufacturer for the supply and > support of the equipment. ResMed’s office is under an hour from where > I live amd they offer equipment supply and support as well as help > with mask supply and fitting – it’s professionally organised with > qualified nurses on staff. > I’m a strong believer in patient involvement in treatment, to the > point that I insist on being in the driving seat regarding medical > issues. This is not to say that I don’t follow the doctor’s > diagnosis, advice and treatment, but at the end of the day, I have > more skin in the game than he does so I check out everything for > myself as well. Part of this is that I certainly want to monitor > effectiveness of treatment for myself, so an important issue was being > able to look at what the equipment was doing and the results. PC > software for the Spirit is available, and although normally it is used > by clinics, the specialist was satisfied that it would be useful for > me to be able to able to look at how my treatment was progressing and > contact him if needed. The software does allow for machine adjustment > of pressure settings that may be dangerous to some patients, so the > doctor needed to be satisfied that I understood the issues of that as > well as the meaning of the results. > All of this has worked really well. I’ve been able to look at the > effect of automatic operation over a period of time and to see the > variations by sleeping position, alcohol if any, day to day variation > an weight. The doctor had also determined early on an appropriate > fixed pressure should I have elected to go with a single pressure > machine. With his agreement, I have tried periods of that and > automatic operation. I’ve found that for me, there is a compliance > improvement in autotitration mode compared with fixed pressure of (on > average) 45 minutes a day. This was based on periods of two weeks > each way, with sleep and mask on times of 6.5 hours and 7.25 hours. > Obviously this isn’t a broad scientific study, but it was enough to > satisfy me that there is a worthwhile benefit for me at least. > The Spirit works well. I quite like the features of automatic stop > and start and integrated heated humidifier. The software is easy to > use and results are clear to read as long as one understands the > meaning of statistical data. > However, I do travel a lot, and the machine, with all the bits and > pieces fills a fair sized bag. It hasn’t been a big problem, but I > felt that I would like to have a backup machine and if possible, > something a bit smaller for travel. I also thought that it would be a > good idea to choose something for a different vendor to see if there > was anything different about the treatment. > With all of those criteria in mind, it wasn’t that hard to select the > Puritan Bennett 420E as being similar to the ResMed in terms of > functionality, but lighter and smaller. I checked with the specialist > and he was happy with the idea of going for this as well. I looked > through the machine specifications and the associated equipment and > was happy with what I found. > I thought that it would be useful to write a few notes. Obviously > some of this is related to the particular situation of buying directly > from the manufacturer and in the UK, but other aspects are fairly > generic about the products. > – The 420E is certainly smaller and lighter than the Spirit on its > own, If I were just doing a one night away trip, I could use the > 420E, with a nasal pillow setup like the ResMed Swift, skip the > humidifier and have a small and light thing to carry. > – I really need to have a heated humidifier because I make regular > trips to the Nordic countries and this time of year humidity is very > low. Without the heated humidifier, I get quite sore nasal passages. > The Spirit has a built in humidifier, powered from the machine itself. > For the 420 series there is a humidifier which sits underneath and has > a water chamber which slides into the heater. The humidifier piece > and main machine still fit into a bag that is smaller than that for > the Spirit. However, the 420E humidifier is powered separately with > a mains power cord, whereas the Spirit has one cord. With the 420E > setup I have a wallwart power supply for the main unit, a power cord > for the humidifier and an double outlet adaptor for the two power > requirements. THis isn’t a big issue, but it does mean that I have to > have a more careful drill when I leave a hotel room in the morning to > make sure that all the bits go in the bag. > – The 420E humidifier is quite fierce. It makes the water noticably > warm even on the lowest setting. On higher settings, it is like a > sauna with several ladles of water on the fire. The Spirit has rather > more gentle settings which still seem to provide good humidity. > – The 420E comes with its own 2m hose with a small pressure sensing > tube running inside. The Spirit has a choice of 2m and 3m hoses with > a setting on the machine. This means more careful selection of > machine position, although with the need for an extension cord anyway, > not a big issue. > – The 420E is able to tolerate a wider range of interfaces. I’ve > stuck to ResMed interfaces on the Spirit, but have found that they all > work OK for me on the 420E – i.e. Activa, Mirage Vista and Swift. > – The 420E has a little more configurability. The Spirit has > settings for minimum and maximum pressure in autotitrating mode > together with hose lenght selection and mask type. The Autoset > algorithm increases pressure up to 10cm in response to flow limitation > and detects and handles apnoea events above that. On the 420E, the > changeover point is configurable. I didn’t see a reason to change > it. > – The Spirit has a ramp feature for fixed pressure and a hold feature > at minimum pressure (settling time) for auto mode. Personally, I find > these irritating and turned them off. The 420E has similar things, > but in auto mode the minimum hold time is 15 mins before the machine > switches to fully automatic. I didn’t have a particular issue with > this, though. Whereas the Spirit begins data recording immediately, > the 420E begins after the 15 minutes. > – The automatic start an stop of the Spirit are absent from the 420E. > You have to press the start/stop button. I didn’t have a huge issue > with this. > – I bought the software for the 420E. It’s cheaper then that for the > Spirit. The download time to the PC is horrendously slow – can be 20 > minutes – whereas the Spirit and its software take under a minute. > However the data presentation is a little better on the 420E software. > – For me, the behaviour of the two machines in autotitration mode is > remarkably similar, measured over several weeks. Although the > algorithms may well be different in detail, the pressure behaviour and > recorded results are virtually the same for me averaged over the time. > There were no surprises of funny peaks etc. in either case. > – Both manufacturers have easy access for a UK private patient to buy > the equipment and both appear to have good servie departments. I > asked service and repair questions of both at different times and was > satisfied with the answers. However, I don’t believe that > Tyco/Puritan Bennett has gone as far as ResMed in terms of > availability of additional services such as mask fitting help etc. > It would be difficult to select between the two machines in terms of > effectiveness and usability. Both give good reported results for me > and the data agrees with that. I like the small size of the 420E, > but dislike the collection of bits to complete the setup. However, > even with all of this it is smaller and lighter than the Spirit. > The Spirit has everything together in one package and is perhaps a bit > more plug and play. However, it is larger overall when all the bits > are added than the 420E. > I found the backup from ResMed first class in the early days of > selecting and fitting interfaces. I don’t need that as much as I did > then. > If I had to select either machine as an only machine, I would be > pleased with either. For travel, I certainly like the 420E. If I > were juat starting out and picking one machine, I would probably still > select the Spirit. It’s better integrated and with good control and > monitoring. Here in the UK, the manufacturer has done a really good > job on customer service and backup for practical details like > interface selection
… read more »
Response:
I’ve been using my ResMed Autoset Spirit autotitrating flow generator for approximately two years and have had very good results with it. For me, it has done exactly what the manufacturers claim as well as what is suggested by clinical studies. I have uncomplicated OSA with no other respiratory or other sleep disorders. Since I am in the UK and using private sector healthcare, diagnosis and consultations are paid for by insurance, but equipment has to be paid for by the patient. For the original choice, I took a lot of care over selection of the type of machine, based on my own research as well as discussion with the specialist. I also looked carefully at manufacturer support of product and patient. For the choice of first machine, ResMed’s Autoset Spirit met all of the criteria and I’ve been very pleased with the choice. In the UK public sector, equipment is supplied and supported via the clinic with what can be quite a variable waiting period. In the private sector, the patient can work directly with the manufacturer for the supply and support of the equipment. ResMed’s office is under an hour from where I live amd they offer equipment supply and support as well as help with mask supply and fitting – it’s professionally organised with qualified nurses on staff. I’m a strong believer in patient involvement in treatment, to the point that I insist on being in the driving seat regarding medical issues. This is not to say that I don’t follow the doctor’s diagnosis, advice and treatment, but at the end of the day, I have more skin in the game than he does so I check out everything for myself as well. Part of this is that I certainly want to monitor effectiveness of treatment for myself, so an important issue was being able to look at what the equipment was doing and the results. PC software for the Spirit is available, and although normally it is used by clinics, the specialist was satisfied that it would be useful for me to be able to able to look at how my treatment was progressing and contact him if needed. The software does allow for machine adjustment of pressure settings that may be dangerous to some patients, so the doctor needed to be satisfied that I understood the issues of that as well as the meaning of the results. All of this has worked really well. I’ve been able to look at the effect of automatic operation over a period of time and to see the variations by sleeping position, alcohol if any, day to day variation an weight. The doctor had also determined early on an appropriate fixed pressure should I have elected to go with a single pressure machine. With his agreement, I have tried periods of that and automatic operation. I’ve found that for me, there is a compliance improvement in autotitration mode compared with fixed pressure of (on average) 45 minutes a day. This was based on periods of two weeks each way, with sleep and mask on times of 6.5 hours and 7.25 hours. Obviously this isn’t a broad scientific study, but it was enough to satisfy me that there is a worthwhile benefit for me at least. The Spirit works well. I quite like the features of automatic stop and start and integrated heated humidifier. The software is easy to use and results are clear to read as long as one understands the meaning of statistical data. However, I do travel a lot, and the machine, with all the bits and pieces fills a fair sized bag. It hasn’t been a big problem, but I felt that I would like to have a backup machine and if possible, something a bit smaller for travel. I also thought that it would be a good idea to choose something for a different vendor to see if there was anything different about the treatment. With all of those criteria in mind, it wasn’t that hard to select the Puritan Bennett 420E as being similar to the ResMed in terms of functionality, but lighter and smaller. I checked with the specialist and he was happy with the idea of going for this as well. I looked through the machine specifications and the associated equipment and was happy with what I found. I thought that it would be useful to write a few notes. Obviously some of this is related to the particular situation of buying directly from the manufacturer and in the UK, but other aspects are fairly generic about the products. – The 420E is certainly smaller and lighter than the Spirit on its own, If I were just doing a one night away trip, I could use the 420E, with a nasal pillow setup like the ResMed Swift, skip the humidifier and have a small and light thing to carry. – I really need to have a heated humidifier because I make regular trips to the Nordic countries and this time of year humidity is very low. Without the heated humidifier, I get quite sore nasal passages. The Spirit has a built in humidifier, powered from the machine itself. For the 420 series there is a humidifier which sits underneath and has a water chamber which slides into the heater. The humidifier piece and main machine still fit into a bag that is smaller than that for the Spirit. However, the 420E humidifier is powered separately with a mains power cord, whereas the Spirit has one cord. With the 420E setup I have a wallwart power supply for the main unit, a power cord for the humidifier and an double outlet adaptor for the two power requirements. THis isn’t a big issue, but it does mean that I have to have a more careful drill when I leave a hotel room in the morning to make sure that all the bits go in the bag. – The 420E humidifier is quite fierce. It makes the water noticably warm even on the lowest setting. On higher settings, it is like a sauna with several ladles of water on the fire. The Spirit has rather more gentle settings which still seem to provide good humidity. – The 420E comes with its own 2m hose with a small pressure sensing tube running inside. The Spirit has a choice of 2m and 3m hoses with a setting on the machine. This means more careful selection of machine position, although with the need for an extension cord anyway, not a big issue. – The 420E is able to tolerate a wider range of interfaces. I’ve stuck to ResMed interfaces on the Spirit, but have found that they all work OK for me on the 420E – i.e. Activa, Mirage Vista and Swift. – The 420E has a little more configurability. The Spirit has settings for minimum and maximum pressure in autotitrating mode together with hose lenght selection and mask type. The Autoset algorithm increases pressure up to 10cm in response to flow limitation and detects and handles apnoea events above that. On the 420E, the changeover point is configurable. I didn’t see a reason to change it. – The Spirit has a ramp feature for fixed pressure and a hold feature at minimum pressure (settling time) for auto mode. Personally, I find these irritating and turned them off. The 420E has similar things, but in auto mode the minimum hold time is 15 mins before the machine switches to fully automatic. I didn’t have a particular issue with this, though. Whereas the Spirit begins data recording immediately, the 420E begins after the 15 minutes. – The automatic start an stop of the Spirit are absent from the 420E. You have to press the start/stop button. I didn’t have a huge issue with this. – I bought the software for the 420E. It’s cheaper then that for the Spirit. The download time to the PC is horrendously slow – can be 20 minutes – whereas the Spirit and its software take under a minute. However the data presentation is a little better on the 420E software. – For me, the behaviour of the two machines in autotitration mode is remarkably similar, measured over several weeks. Although the algorithms may well be different in detail, the pressure behaviour and recorded results are virtually the same for me averaged over the time. There were no surprises of funny peaks etc. in either case. – Both manufacturers have easy access for a UK private patient to buy the equipment and both appear to have good servie departments. I asked service and repair questions of both at different times and was satisfied with the answers. However, I don’t believe that Tyco/Puritan Bennett has gone as far as ResMed in terms of availability of additional services such as mask fitting help etc. It would be difficult to select between the two machines in terms of effectiveness and usability. Both give good reported results for me and the data agrees with that. I like the small size of the 420E, but dislike the collection of bits to complete the setup. However, even with all of this it is smaller and lighter than the Spirit. The Spirit has everything together in one package and is perhaps a bit more plug and play. However, it is larger overall when all the bits are added than the 420E. I found the backup from ResMed first class in the early days of selecting and fitting interfaces. I don’t need that as much as I did then. If I had to select either machine as an only machine, I would be pleased with either. For travel, I certainly like the 420E. If I were juat starting out and picking one machine, I would probably still select the Spirit. It’s better integrated and with good control and monitoring. Here in the UK, the manufacturer has done a really good job on customer service and backup for practical details like interface selection and fitting and I feel that there is a lot of value in that. On the other hand, I don’t think that one would be in trouble for choosing a 420E either as a first and single machine. It also does a good job and is a good choice for travelling even with the less integrated package of bits to make it work. — .andy To email, substitute .nospam with .gl
Response:
On Sat, 23 Apr 2005 11:14:39 GMT, "rob" <bnj…@infionline.net> wrote: >> Andy: >I have used both the Auto set T and the Goodnight 418P for several Years. I >am very knowlegable of the Auto Set T’s Algorithm and have a little >knowledge about the Goodnights Algorithm. I am asumming that the spirt and >goodnigh 420E alogrithm are based on the previous machines Alogorithm.
AIUI, the Autoset T machine had a flow sensor based on a moving paddle connected to a Hall Effect sensor. The Spirit has three pressure sensors – one in the case and two connected to different points in the duct of the machine. Hence from pressure drop along a known path it is possible to deduce flow. THe PB machine has a pressure sensor at the machine and another connected via a small tube running inside the main hose. So the principle used for making the measurement is the same between the two machines. It’s possible that ResMed made some improvements with the Spirit. I had a firmware upgrade for mine which gave more reported data. I also think that it’s possible that if the 418 had the same mechanism as the 420, that it could have done a better job than the Autoset T at detecting more subtle pressure change behaviour. > In >my opinion the Goodnight is very diferent and is definitely superior in some >aspects. With the Goodnight 418P software I can ,on a nightly basis, get >the number of Apneas, Hyponeas, mixed Apneas, and some central apneas. The >central apneas are only a specific type. Hence do not cover all central >apneas.
I am not sure that the inherent algorithm is better between one or the other. For example, I don’t feel any different when using either and the AHI figures are not markedly different when averaged (as one should) over a period of time. >This type of information is useful to me. The Algorithm is also suppose to >have some capability on UAR’s. Does the Goodnight 420 E have this >capability The reason which caused me to switch to another machine is that >418 reports a large number of runs. I do not understand what this >specification means. I think this specification reports a combination of >pressure increase and some of runs may be caused by UAR’s
The reporting between the machines is rather different, with the PB machine’s software providing more statistical analysis. On the other hand, it is not as well implemented in terms of how long it takes to get data and general navigation through its functions as ResMed’s SW. It could be that the machine itself is able to detect a difference in the flow/pressure/time characteristic between various types of apnoea and UARS, but I have not found that the manufacturer makes that claim. I would imagine that they would if it did. The clinical manuals are fairly similar in their notes to the physician. I haven’t read a great deal about UARS (mainly because I don’t have the issue), but a quick look at papers on the subject, e.g. http://www.somnolab.de/pdfs/slpwke98165.pdf suggests that it’s pretty difficult to detect it even using full PSG…… — .andy To email, substitute .nospam with .gl
Response:
Andy Hall wrote: "Andy Hall" <an…@hall.nospam> wrote in message
news:e1ch2158bi4fj090suorph49ubm5n28l26@4ax.com… – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -> I’ve been using my ResMed Autoset Spirit autotitrating flow generator > for approximately two years and have had very good results with it. > For me, it has done exactly what the manufacturers claim as well as > what is suggested by clinical studies. I have uncomplicated OSA > with no other respiratory or other sleep disorders. Since I am in > the UK and using private sector healthcare, diagnosis and > consultations are paid for by insurance, but equipment has to be paid > for by the patient. For the original choice, I took a lot of care > over selection of the type of machine, based on my own research as > well as discussion with the specialist. I also looked carefully at > manufacturer support of product and patient. > For the choice of first machine, ResMed’s Autoset Spirit met all of > the criteria and I’ve been very pleased with the choice. In the UK > public sector, equipment is supplied and supported via the clinic with > what can be quite a variable waiting period. In the private sector, > the patient can work directly with the manufacturer for the supply and > support of the equipment. ResMed’s office is under an hour from where > I live amd they offer equipment supply and support as well as help > with mask supply and fitting – it’s professionally organised with > qualified nurses on staff. > I’m a strong believer in patient involvement in treatment, to the > point that I insist on being in the driving seat regarding medical > issues. This is not to say that I don’t follow the doctor’s > diagnosis, advice and treatment, but at the end of the day, I have > more skin in the game than he does so I check out everything for > myself as well. Part of this is that I certainly want to monitor > effectiveness of treatment for myself, so an important issue was being > able to look at what the equipment was doing and the results. PC > software for the Spirit is available, and although normally it is used > by clinics, the specialist was satisfied that it would be useful for > me to be able to able to look at how my treatment was progressing and > contact him if needed. The software does allow for machine adjustment > of pressure settings that may be dangerous to some patients, so the > doctor needed to be satisfied that I understood the issues of that as > well as the meaning of the results. > All of this has worked really well. I’ve been able to look at the > effect of automatic operation over a period of time and to see the > variations by sleeping position, alcohol if any, day to day variation > an weight. The doctor had also determined early on an appropriate > fixed pressure should I have elected to go with a single pressure > machine. With his agreement, I have tried periods of that and > automatic operation. I’ve found that for me, there is a compliance > improvement in autotitration mode compared with fixed pressure of (on > average) 45 minutes a day. This was based on periods of two weeks > each way, with sleep and mask on times of 6.5 hours and 7.25 hours. > Obviously this isn’t a broad scientific study, but it was enough to > satisfy me that there is a worthwhile benefit for me at least. > The Spirit works well. I quite like the features of automatic stop > and start and integrated heated humidifier. The software is easy to > use and results are clear to read as long as one understands the > meaning of statistical data. > However, I do travel a lot, and the machine, with all the bits and > pieces fills a fair sized bag. It hasn’t been a big problem, but I > felt that I would like to have a backup machine and if possible, > something a bit smaller for travel. I also thought that it would be a > good idea to choose something for a different vendor to see if there > was anything different about the treatment. > With all of those criteria in mind, it wasn’t that hard to select the > Puritan Bennett 420E as being similar to the ResMed in terms of > functionality, but lighter and smaller. I checked with the specialist > and he was happy with the idea of going for this as well. I looked > through the machine specifications and the associated equipment and > was happy with what I found. > I thought that it would be useful to write a few notes. Obviously > some of this is related to the particular situation of buying directly > from the manufacturer and in the UK, but other aspects are fairly > generic about the products. > – The 420E is certainly smaller and lighter than the Spirit on its > own, If I were just doing a one night away trip, I could use the > 420E, with a nasal pillow setup like the ResMed Swift, skip the > humidifier and have a small and light thing to carry. > – I really need to have a heated humidifier because I make regular > trips to the Nordic countries and this time of year humidity is very > low. Without the heated humidifier, I get quite sore nasal passages. > The Spirit has a built in humidifier, powered from the machine itself. > For the 420 series there is a humidifier which sits underneath and has > a water chamber which slides into the heater. The humidifier piece > and main machine still fit into a bag that is smaller than that for > the Spirit. However, the 420E humidifier is powered separately with > a mains power cord, whereas the Spirit has one cord. With the 420E > setup I have a wallwart power supply for the main unit, a power cord > for the humidifier and an double outlet adaptor for the two power > requirements. THis isn’t a big issue, but it does mean that I have to > have a more careful drill when I leave a hotel room in the morning to > make sure that all the bits go in the bag. > – The 420E humidifier is quite fierce. It makes the water noticably > warm even on the lowest setting. On higher settings, it is like a > sauna with several ladles of water on the fire. The Spirit has rather > more gentle settings which still seem to provide good humidity. > – The 420E comes with its own 2m hose with a small pressure sensing > tube running inside. The Spirit has a choice of 2m and 3m hoses with > a setting on the machine. This means more careful selection of > machine position, although with the need for an extension cord anyway, > not a big issue. > – The 420E is able to tolerate a wider range of interfaces. I’ve > stuck to ResMed interfaces on the Spirit, but have found that they all > work OK for me on the 420E – i.e. Activa, Mirage Vista and Swift. > – The 420E has a little more configurability. The Spirit has > settings for minimum and maximum pressure in autotitrating mode > together with hose lenght selection and mask type. The Autoset > algorithm increases pressure up to 10cm in response to flow limitation > and detects and handles apnoea events above that. On the 420E, the > changeover point is configurable. I didn’t see a reason to change > it. > – The Spirit has a ramp feature for fixed pressure and a hold feature > at minimum pressure (settling time) for auto mode. Personally, I find > these irritating and turned them off. The 420E has similar things, > but in auto mode the minimum hold time is 15 mins before the machine > switches to fully automatic. I didn’t have a particular issue with > this, though. Whereas the Spirit begins data recording immediately, > the 420E begins after the 15 minutes. > – The automatic start an stop of the Spirit are absent from the 420E. > You have to press the start/stop button. I didn’t have a huge issue > with this. > – I bought the software for the 420E. It’s cheaper then that for the > Spirit. The download time to the PC is horrendously slow – can be 20 > minutes – whereas the Spirit and its software take under a minute. > However the data presentation is a little better on the 420E software. > – For me, the behaviour of the two machines in autotitration mode is > remarkably similar, measured over several weeks. Although the > algorithms may well be different in detail, the pressure behaviour and > recorded results are virtually the same for me averaged over the time. > There were no surprises of funny peaks etc. in either case. > – Both manufacturers have easy access for a UK private patient to buy > the equipment and both appear to have good servie departments. I > asked service and repair questions of both at different times and was > satisfied with the answers. However, I don’t believe that > Tyco/Puritan Bennett has gone as far as ResMed in terms of > availability of additional services such as mask fitting help etc. > It would be difficult to select between the two machines in terms of > effectiveness and usability. Both give good reported results for me > and the data agrees with that. I like the small size of the 420E, > but dislike the collection of bits to complete the setup. However, > even with all of this it is smaller and lighter than the Spirit. > The Spirit has everything together in one package and is perhaps a bit > more plug and play. However, it is larger overall when all the bits > are added than the 420E. > I found the backup from ResMed first class in the early days of > selecting and fitting interfaces. I don’t need that as much as I did > then. > If I had to select either machine as an only machine, I would be > pleased with either. For travel, I certainly like the 420E. If I > were juat starting out and picking one machine, I would probably still > select the Spirit. It’s better integrated and with good control and > monitoring. Here in the UK, the manufacturer has done a really good > job on customer service and backup for practical details like > interface selection and fitting and I feel that there is a lot of > value in that. > On the other hand, I don’t think that one would be in trouble for > choosing a 420E either as a first and single machine.
… read more »
Response:
On Sat, 5 Mar 2005 08:48:46 +0100, "Wim Vogelaar" <wim.vogelaar at – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -mc2world dot org> wrote: >"Andy Hall" <an…@hall.nospam> schreef in bericht >news:e1ch2158bi4fj090suorph49ubm5n28l26@4ax.com… >Thanks Andy for your very helpful information. Perhaps you are also willing >to say something about prices. >Here follows information about prices in The Netherlands. >I payed last month 983 US dollars for my ResMed AutoSet Spirit + ResMed >Mirage Vista Mask + ResMed AutoScan 5.4 software. I bought it at >www.cpapworld.com in California. Distribution costs to The Netherlands via >FedEx: 150 US dollars. Total costs: 1133 US dollars (= 856 Euro). I ordered >it on 2005-02-25 and it was delivered at my home at 2005-02-28.
I think that the US price was pretty fair, and on a direct exchange rate basis, nit very different to what I paid in the UK – maybe 10% which is fairly normal. Presumably the $150 included import VAT? You might want to check into the VAT situation. In the UK, if you have essential medical need (OSA counts for this), you are entitled to VAT exemption. This means that if I buy things here that do carry VAT, if the supplier is organised I can fill in a VAT exemption form and not pay. For an import, I pay the VAT and then can reclaim it at the local Customs and Excise VAT office (Customs runs VAT here). For some bizarre reason, medical equipment, even if only available on prescription, does carry VAT and one has to do this exemption or reclaim thing. I am not sure whether all of this originates from an EU Directive or whether it is still a per country thing, but it would be worth your while to make enquiries. >Here in the Netherlands the price of CPAP stuff is in the range of 2500 Euro >to 4000 Euro (=3311 US dollar to 5298 US dollar).
That’s outrageous…. I have done business in the Netherlands for many years (not in the medical area) and have noticed that is is quite common to have list prices that are a long way above the list prices in surrounding countries. It was once explained to me that this is partly a cultural thing because Dutch people love to negotiate
How true that is, I don’t know……. >A few days ago I bought here in The Netherlands the ResMed Ultra Mirage Full >Face Mask for 320 Euro (= 424 US dollar). >On http://www.cpap.net/manufacturers_cpaps/resmed/UltraMirageMask.htm the >price is: 98 US dollar!!!
This is at least twice the UK price. Have you looked at Belgium and Germany, or possibly France? I would expect prices in Germany to be a bit high but I would have thought Belgium and France could be reasonable. >Of course I have now a problem when there would be a defect in my machine. >But seen the enormous differences in prices I do possibly better throwing >away my old apparatus in case it would fail and buy a new one. For repair >you possibly have to wait more days than awaiting the delivery of a new one >(3 days).
This is the problem. I wouldn’t have a problem buying masks etc. from the U.S. because ultimately they are disposable items anyway. I don’t think I’d risk a flow generator unless I could be certain that I could get local service. I would expect to be able to get that on a paid basis, but I think that getting any warranty cover would be difficult. THe repair factor was one reason for getting a second machine. Although I can go to ResMed eaily and get a repair done (probably while I wait), it’s basically most of a day gone and if I am going on a business trip I really want to have an alternative packed and ready to go at short notice. — .andy To email, substitute .nospam with .gl
Response:
"Andy Hall" <an…@hall.nospam> schreef in bericht news:e1ch2158bi4fj090suorph49ubm5n28l26@4ax.com… Thanks Andy for your very helpful information. Perhaps you are also willing to say something about prices. Here follows information about prices in The Netherlands. I payed last month 983 US dollars for my ResMed AutoSet Spirit + ResMed Mirage Vista Mask + ResMed AutoScan 5.4 software. I bought it at www.cpapworld.com in California. Distribution costs to The Netherlands via FedEx: 150 US dollars. Total costs: 1133 US dollars (= 856 Euro). I ordered it on 2005-02-25 and it was delivered at my home at 2005-02-28. Here in the Netherlands the price of CPAP stuff is in the range of 2500 Euro to 4000 Euro (=3311 US dollar to 5298 US dollar). A few days ago I bought here in The Netherlands the ResMed Ultra Mirage Full Face Mask for 320 Euro (= 424 US dollar). On http://www.cpap.net/manufacturers_cpaps/resmed/UltraMirageMask.htm the price is: 98 US dollar!!! Of course I have now a problem when there would be a defect in my machine. But seen the enormous differences in prices I do possibly better throwing away my old apparatus in case it would fail and buy a new one. For repair you possibly have to wait more days than awaiting the delivery of a new one (3 days). Wim Vogelaar, http://home.wanadoo.nl/w.h.vogelaar/marfan/apnea/