Question:
Your Name Here=Harvey (k…@ing.notin.aus) writes: – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -> In article <ctalbv$9n…@theodyn.ncf.ca>, bc…@FreeNet.Carleton.CA says… >>Your Name Here=Harvey (k…@ing.notin.aus) writes: >>> In article <ct7uc4$qo…@theodyn.ncf.ca>, bc…@FreeNet.Carleton.CA says… >>>>Your Name Here=Harvey (k…@ing.notin.aus) writes: >>>>> In article <ct6kb1$no…@theodyn.ncf.ca>, bc…@FreeNet.Carleton.CA > says… >>>>>>> On the Thurs – this week, it’s going to show how those American > students >>> in >>>>>>> mathematics managed to win lots of money from various casinos. >>>>>>> I think it’s with Blackjack, using card counting and probabilities… >>>>>>> It would be a clever detailed system of some sort. >>>>>>> Harvey >>>>>>The system in question, if the same as they had here, is basednot so much >>>>>>on probability but on cunting that it is a fixed and tricked "game". >>>>>>Compuerized trickery if you will. Where someoen finally tried my idea in >>>>>>Montreal and won millions at the casino threre time in a row. The third >>>>>>time, in a same evenign I think it was, they closed the casino down and >>>>>>refused to pay him. >>>>>>The guys simply wrote a lil program to know what woudl be the winnign > thing >>>>>>the next time. Wonlt give the deatils here, bt it is very simple in fact. >>>>>>About 6 lines of programming at max:). >>>>>>Later, when it was decsribed how the guy did it, I finally knew for a > fact >>>>>>he used my method. >>>>>>The casino, to try and avoid being proven cheating, simpl said it was a >>>>>>defective chip in their puters that made it so that :random" numbers were >>>>>>not *really* random. It;s a complicated sequence, but I foudn how to > break >>>>>>it quite some years ago. In the 80s. I was thinkiing lottery then…. >>>>>>Still am, but well, I dunno hwo to program in the new languages they have >>>>>>today, and to try and ask someone to convert that woudl be like giving >>>>>>them the fortune. Would take a cool head, and not many have that. Even >>>>>>that twit blew it at the casino playing him self each time, the same >>>>>>evening too. Like DOH, he coudl have ted various casinos in various >>>>>>cities around the world, to avoid being spotted;-), and after making >>>>>>reasonably well, have someone else play, then another, getting all his >>>>>>friends and relatives rich and all that. But nooooo. He was too gredy and >>>>>>not cold headed enough at all…. >>>>>>Someone then offered him a job, paying him 100 thou a year. Bad choice, > If >>>>>>anyone understanding what this means can only act that stupidly with it, >>>>>>then I;d not hire them at all….They’d lack coolness, nerve, ponderation >>> and >>>>>>good ole common sense. Amd all in all would show just too greedy to > trust. >>>>>>Ooops. Disconection warning. Better post as is… >>>>> Basically if you have any kind of system that works… >>>>> as regards casino games – you’ve got your part time job / or secondary >>>>> income waiting for you. >>>>> It is the allure of the casino and other gambling games (eg. Lotto) to >>>>> make people think – oh, yes, try out any kind of system out on us, >>>>> we’re betting on people wanting to do just that… >>>>> But using any kind of formal ’system’ that does not rely upon ‘luck’ >>>>> or ‘chance’ – such as taking note of counting cards, is highly frowned > upon >>>>> by them. >>>>> The story would be – don’t get noticed by the casino or their staff, and >>>>> only win enough so that ‘they’ don’t notice too much. >>>>> Basically make a killing and don’t go back there, so soon… >>>>No, you don’t "get" it at all here, cause I won;t give more details, but >>>>this one is not at all cheating. It is exactly a method that would be >>>>considered like any other, and that had the casino in Montreal closed a >>>>few days, imagne that. Cause as much as the method is honest, it *proves >>>>the cheating done by the casino*. So the player is not cheating,the >>>>casino is, and the fact that they cheat is the constant that this >>>>establishes, so to speak. Agaion, I don’t weanna say more as I consider it >>>>a safe method. And it was tested, without playing the numbers it gave me, >>>>and it worked. It is not a superstitious methd, but a logical one. Where >>>>taken into consideration is the fact that the numbers are rigged. The giuy >>>>that did it used that method exactly, if he made it way more complicated >>>>for nothing, and again, won three times in a row, had won 8 millions that >>>>night, where when he won the last three of them, they closed the casino. >>>>An enquiry was made when the guy said how he did it, which went over >>>>everyone’s head for how it would always work:). The casino as I said then >>>>pretended that it must have been that their computer chips did not work. >>>>It has nothig to do with cards at all, with cheating or anything. It is to >>>>the contrary playing "against a cheater" and well, let me compare it to >>>>figuring out how the cheater "thinks", which has nothing to do with it >>>>either as there, some bluff. But it is entirely logical, leaves n room for >>>>any random nothing in it. It is clear, certain, etc. >>>>Let me try this way which will be saying too much already. If in a six >>>>numbers lottery, the numbers would be 2,4,6,8 for the forst four, you >>>>could know the next ones would be 8 and 10, if that lottery is rigged and >>>>the numbers spat by a puter program obeying to some sort of operation >>>>between the numbers. Any numbers rigged will have to have a sequence to > them. >>>>The numbers seem to be toodifferent to be sequential to our eyes and >>>>brain. But not to a puter. Where poeple go wrong is trying to get the >>>>"trick" of the sequence. Not me. I just seek the number, who cares about >>>>the rule of the sequence. Poeple want the winning number, not the hidden >>>>trick, in the end! Then why guess the trick? >>>>You can probably earn a tidy income if you had any kind of winning >>>>> system (of any kind – luck/chance/probability/pyschic or otherwise). >>>>> But if you do win a great deal of money at it, chances are, they’ll > spread >>>>> the news about you – so that you’ll be banned from all similar venues. >>>>Not immediately unless one is an idiot in fact. Not cool headed, and >>>>playing too close in time and space. Sure, after a while they would. But >>>>who needs to win all lotteries in the end? Jst one nice one is good >>>>enough, unless one excatly is stupid/greedy for nothing/addicted to >>>>winning up to managing to lose it all. >>>>:) >>>>hey most likely change the cheating sequence each x months. One can fall >>>>on that. But that is very lil risk for the investment and sure gain the >>>>next time. And I am not even sure they change the sequence until they >>>>woudl exactly suspect someone could have figured out, but not in the way I >>>>found, cause that will find it out the second they used the rigged way art >>>>least once or twice…One just has to keep track of the numbers that won >>>>before, and take it from there. >>>>Again, this is the method that someone else used, where it worked. They >>>>HAD to give him his last 3 millions in the end. Cause he did not cheat: >>>>the methd is useles *unless the casino DOES cheat* itself, where then one >>>>is sure to play honestly each time, and to in fact reveal that all they >>>>did was uncover the cheater: the casino itself. When that can be proven, >>>>and the method exactly is based on that and proves so then, Justice could >>>>only call cheater the casino. But they would not. They’d say one of their >>>>chips is defective, doh;-). >>>>Lotteries third prizes or so are won by maffia poeple for money laundering. >>>>Not the jackpot. The jackpot is used as a distraction. >>>>But prizes that are still high, yet "nothing" compared to the jackpot and >>>>not paid attention to and names not so publicized at all, belong to the >>>>maffia, anywhere there is a casino/lottery of any substantial amount for a >>>>prize. >>>>Since they can know what number to tell their biys to play, where to win 5 >>>>on 6 or five on sicx plus bonus and be known to be the winner of the next >>>>5 on 6, says they gotta know the numbers ahead of time. >>>>Someimes someoen happens to accidnetally play the right 6 on 6 and bonus. >>>>The odds here are of 14 millions to one. The jackpot is far from won each >>>>time. Makes more laundering money for them… >>>>Little is it known that once, a man won three draws in a row. Another >>>>twit:). He was actually offered three millions as compensation for never >>>>playng again. That all made me think it then could only be rigged. Odds >>>>were so against that man winning again, we are talking the order of 14 >>>>millions times f 14 millions times fouteen millions times fourteen >>>>millions PLUS the usual odds against him, that for them to pay him to >>>>enever play again was itself not going with odds AT ALL. I then was sure >>>>it was rigged. >>>>The beauty of what I found is that it does not care about the method. >>>>Everyoen trying a superstitious way of finding a trick does try and find >>>>exactly the trick. But that is useless. One does not win by knowign the >>>>trick but knowing the winning numbers ahead of time. >>>>And that can be done as soon as the last draw numbers are out. >>>>Poeple for the few I said the way to, poeple I trusted woudl not go and do >>>>it, either because they blck at the ide of it being possible (usually that >>>>suffices:)), or because they just could not grasp it, never used it, for >>>>thinking "Nah…could not be rigged". Or "Could not work". >>>>And the rest donlt belive me cause I never played it myself. I foudn the >>>>next numbers ut without buying the ticket for it which of its own beats >>>>peope’s understanding, cause they would not be cool headed and are
… read more »
Response:
In article <ctalbv$9n…@theodyn.ncf.ca>, bc…@FreeNet.Carleton.CA says… – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text ->Your Name Here=Harvey (k…@ing.notin.aus) writes: >> In article <ct7uc4$qo…@theodyn.ncf.ca>, bc…@FreeNet.Carleton.CA says… >>>Your Name Here=Harvey (k…@ing.notin.aus) writes: >>>> In article <ct6kb1$no…@theodyn.ncf.ca>, bc…@FreeNet.Carleton.CA says… >>>>>> On the Thurs – this week, it’s going to show how those American students >> in >>>>>> mathematics managed to win lots of money from various casinos. >>>>>> I think it’s with Blackjack, using card counting and probabilities… >>>>>> It would be a clever detailed system of some sort. >>>>>> Harvey >>>>>The system in question, if the same as they had here, is basednot so much >>>>>on probability but on cunting that it is a fixed and tricked "game". >>>>>Compuerized trickery if you will. Where someoen finally tried my idea in >>>>>Montreal and won millions at the casino threre time in a row. The third >>>>>time, in a same evenign I think it was, they closed the casino down and >>>>>refused to pay him. >>>>>The guys simply wrote a lil program to know what woudl be the winnign thing >>>>>the next time. Wonlt give the deatils here, bt it is very simple in fact. >>>>>About 6 lines of programming at max:). >>>>>Later, when it was decsribed how the guy did it, I finally knew for a fact >>>>>he used my method. >>>>>The casino, to try and avoid being proven cheating, simpl said it was a >>>>>defective chip in their puters that made it so that :random" numbers were >>>>>not *really* random. It;s a complicated sequence, but I foudn how to break >>>>>it quite some years ago. In the 80s. I was thinkiing lottery then…. >>>>>Still am, but well, I dunno hwo to program in the new languages they have >>>>>today, and to try and ask someone to convert that woudl be like giving >>>>>them the fortune. Would take a cool head, and not many have that. Even >>>>>that twit blew it at the casino playing him self each time, the same >>>>>evening too. Like DOH, he coudl have ted various casinos in various >>>>>cities around the world, to avoid being spotted;-), and after making >>>>>reasonably well, have someone else play, then another, getting all his >>>>>friends and relatives rich and all that. But nooooo. He was too gredy and >>>>>not cold headed enough at all…. >>>>>Someone then offered him a job, paying him 100 thou a year. Bad choice, If >>>>>anyone understanding what this means can only act that stupidly with it, >>>>>then I;d not hire them at all….They’d lack coolness, nerve, ponderation >> and >>>>>good ole common sense. Amd all in all would show just too greedy to trust. >>>>>Ooops. Disconection warning. Better post as is… >>>> Basically if you have any kind of system that works… >>>> as regards casino games – you’ve got your part time job / or secondary >>>> income waiting for you. >>>> It is the allure of the casino and other gambling games (eg. Lotto) to >>>> make people think – oh, yes, try out any kind of system out on us, >>>> we’re betting on people wanting to do just that… >>>> But using any kind of formal ’system’ that does not rely upon ‘luck’ >>>> or ‘chance’ – such as taking note of counting cards, is highly frowned upon >>>> by them. >>>> The story would be – don’t get noticed by the casino or their staff, and >>>> only win enough so that ‘they’ don’t notice too much. >>>> Basically make a killing and don’t go back there, so soon… >>>No, you don’t "get" it at all here, cause I won;t give more details, but >>>this one is not at all cheating. It is exactly a method that would be >>>considered like any other, and that had the casino in Montreal closed a >>>few days, imagne that. Cause as much as the method is honest, it *proves >>>the cheating done by the casino*. So the player is not cheating,the >>>casino is, and the fact that they cheat is the constant that this >>>establishes, so to speak. Agaion, I don’t weanna say more as I consider it >>>a safe method. And it was tested, without playing the numbers it gave me, >>>and it worked. It is not a superstitious methd, but a logical one. Where >>>taken into consideration is the fact that the numbers are rigged. The giuy >>>that did it used that method exactly, if he made it way more complicated >>>for nothing, and again, won three times in a row, had won 8 millions that >>>night, where when he won the last three of them, they closed the casino. >>>An enquiry was made when the guy said how he did it, which went over >>>everyone’s head for how it would always work:). The casino as I said then >>>pretended that it must have been that their computer chips did not work. >>>It has nothig to do with cards at all, with cheating or anything. It is to >>>the contrary playing "against a cheater" and well, let me compare it to >>>figuring out how the cheater "thinks", which has nothing to do with it >>>either as there, some bluff. But it is entirely logical, leaves n room for >>>any random nothing in it. It is clear, certain, etc. >>>Let me try this way which will be saying too much already. If in a six >>>numbers lottery, the numbers would be 2,4,6,8 for the forst four, you >>>could know the next ones would be 8 and 10, if that lottery is rigged and >>>the numbers spat by a puter program obeying to some sort of operation >>>between the numbers. Any numbers rigged will have to have a sequence to them. >>>The numbers seem to be toodifferent to be sequential to our eyes and >>>brain. But not to a puter. Where poeple go wrong is trying to get the >>>"trick" of the sequence. Not me. I just seek the number, who cares about >>>the rule of the sequence. Poeple want the winning number, not the hidden >>>trick, in the end! Then why guess the trick? >>>You can probably earn a tidy income if you had any kind of winning >>>> system (of any kind – luck/chance/probability/pyschic or otherwise). >>>> But if you do win a great deal of money at it, chances are, they’ll spread >>>> the news about you – so that you’ll be banned from all similar venues. >>>Not immediately unless one is an idiot in fact. Not cool headed, and >>>playing too close in time and space. Sure, after a while they would. But >>>who needs to win all lotteries in the end? Jst one nice one is good >>>enough, unless one excatly is stupid/greedy for nothing/addicted to >>>winning up to managing to lose it all. >>>:) >>>hey most likely change the cheating sequence each x months. One can fall >>>on that. But that is very lil risk for the investment and sure gain the >>>next time. And I am not even sure they change the sequence until they >>>woudl exactly suspect someone could have figured out, but not in the way I >>>found, cause that will find it out the second they used the rigged way art >>>least once or twice…One just has to keep track of the numbers that won >>>before, and take it from there. >>>Again, this is the method that someone else used, where it worked. They >>>HAD to give him his last 3 millions in the end. Cause he did not cheat: >>>the methd is useles *unless the casino DOES cheat* itself, where then one >>>is sure to play honestly each time, and to in fact reveal that all they >>>did was uncover the cheater: the casino itself. When that can be proven, >>>and the method exactly is based on that and proves so then, Justice could >>>only call cheater the casino. But they would not. They’d say one of their >>>chips is defective, doh;-). >>>Lotteries third prizes or so are won by maffia poeple for money laundering. >>>Not the jackpot. The jackpot is used as a distraction. >>>But prizes that are still high, yet "nothing" compared to the jackpot and >>>not paid attention to and names not so publicized at all, belong to the >>>maffia, anywhere there is a casino/lottery of any substantial amount for a >>>prize. >>>Since they can know what number to tell their biys to play, where to win 5 >>>on 6 or five on sicx plus bonus and be known to be the winner of the next >>>5 on 6, says they gotta know the numbers ahead of time. >>>Someimes someoen happens to accidnetally play the right 6 on 6 and bonus. >>>The odds here are of 14 millions to one. The jackpot is far from won each >>>time. Makes more laundering money for them… >>>Little is it known that once, a man won three draws in a row. Another >>>twit:). He was actually offered three millions as compensation for never >>>playng again. That all made me think it then could only be rigged. Odds >>>were so against that man winning again, we are talking the order of 14 >>>millions times f 14 millions times fouteen millions times fourteen >>>millions PLUS the usual odds against him, that for them to pay him to >>>enever play again was itself not going with odds AT ALL. I then was sure >>>it was rigged. >>>The beauty of what I found is that it does not care about the method. >>>Everyoen trying a superstitious way of finding a trick does try and find >>>exactly the trick. But that is useless. One does not win by knowign the >>>trick but knowing the winning numbers ahead of time. >>>And that can be done as soon as the last draw numbers are out. >>>Poeple for the few I said the way to, poeple I trusted woudl not go and do >>>it, either because they blck at the ide of it being possible (usually that >>>suffices:)), or because they just could not grasp it, never used it, for >>>thinking "Nah…could not be rigged". Or "Could not work". >>>And the rest donlt belive me cause I never played it myself. I foudn the >>>next numbers ut without buying the ticket for it which of its own beats >>>peope’s understanding, cause they would not be cool headed and are not, >>>period:). And cause they can not grasp why oen that woudl be able to find >>>out the numbers would not play them. >>>I’m not the type that does things "just cause I can", I guess:) >>>But I tell ya, the method is 100%
… read more »
Response:
Your Name Here=Harvey (k…@ing.notin.aus) writes: – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -> In article <ct7uc4$qo…@theodyn.ncf.ca>, bc…@FreeNet.Carleton.CA says… >>Your Name Here=Harvey (k…@ing.notin.aus) writes: >>> In article <ct6kb1$no…@theodyn.ncf.ca>, bc…@FreeNet.Carleton.CA says… >>>>> On the Thurs – this week, it’s going to show how those American students > in >>>>> mathematics managed to win lots of money from various casinos. >>>>> I think it’s with Blackjack, using card counting and probabilities… >>>>> It would be a clever detailed system of some sort. >>>>> Harvey >>>>The system in question, if the same as they had here, is basednot so much >>>>on probability but on cunting that it is a fixed and tricked "game". >>>>Compuerized trickery if you will. Where someoen finally tried my idea in >>>>Montreal and won millions at the casino threre time in a row. The third >>>>time, in a same evenign I think it was, they closed the casino down and >>>>refused to pay him. >>>>The guys simply wrote a lil program to know what woudl be the winnign thing >>>>the next time. Wonlt give the deatils here, bt it is very simple in fact. >>>>About 6 lines of programming at max:). >>>>Later, when it was decsribed how the guy did it, I finally knew for a fact >>>>he used my method. >>>>The casino, to try and avoid being proven cheating, simpl said it was a >>>>defective chip in their puters that made it so that :random" numbers were >>>>not *really* random. It;s a complicated sequence, but I foudn how to break >>>>it quite some years ago. In the 80s. I was thinkiing lottery then…. >>>>Still am, but well, I dunno hwo to program in the new languages they have >>>>today, and to try and ask someone to convert that woudl be like giving >>>>them the fortune. Would take a cool head, and not many have that. Even >>>>that twit blew it at the casino playing him self each time, the same >>>>evening too. Like DOH, he coudl have ted various casinos in various >>>>cities around the world, to avoid being spotted;-), and after making >>>>reasonably well, have someone else play, then another, getting all his >>>>friends and relatives rich and all that. But nooooo. He was too gredy and >>>>not cold headed enough at all…. >>>>Someone then offered him a job, paying him 100 thou a year. Bad choice, If >>>>anyone understanding what this means can only act that stupidly with it, >>>>then I;d not hire them at all….They’d lack coolness, nerve, ponderation > and >>>>good ole common sense. Amd all in all would show just too greedy to trust. >>>>Ooops. Disconection warning. Better post as is… >>> Basically if you have any kind of system that works… >>> as regards casino games – you’ve got your part time job / or secondary >>> income waiting for you. >>> It is the allure of the casino and other gambling games (eg. Lotto) to >>> make people think – oh, yes, try out any kind of system out on us, >>> we’re betting on people wanting to do just that… >>> But using any kind of formal ’system’ that does not rely upon ‘luck’ >>> or ‘chance’ – such as taking note of counting cards, is highly frowned upon >>> by them. >>> The story would be – don’t get noticed by the casino or their staff, and >>> only win enough so that ‘they’ don’t notice too much. >>> Basically make a killing and don’t go back there, so soon… >>No, you don’t "get" it at all here, cause I won;t give more details, but >>this one is not at all cheating. It is exactly a method that would be >>considered like any other, and that had the casino in Montreal closed a >>few days, imagne that. Cause as much as the method is honest, it *proves >>the cheating done by the casino*. So the player is not cheating,the >>casino is, and the fact that they cheat is the constant that this >>establishes, so to speak. Agaion, I don’t weanna say more as I consider it >>a safe method. And it was tested, without playing the numbers it gave me, >>and it worked. It is not a superstitious methd, but a logical one. Where >>taken into consideration is the fact that the numbers are rigged. The giuy >>that did it used that method exactly, if he made it way more complicated >>for nothing, and again, won three times in a row, had won 8 millions that >>night, where when he won the last three of them, they closed the casino. >>An enquiry was made when the guy said how he did it, which went over >>everyone’s head for how it would always work:). The casino as I said then >>pretended that it must have been that their computer chips did not work. >>It has nothig to do with cards at all, with cheating or anything. It is to >>the contrary playing "against a cheater" and well, let me compare it to >>figuring out how the cheater "thinks", which has nothing to do with it >>either as there, some bluff. But it is entirely logical, leaves n room for >>any random nothing in it. It is clear, certain, etc. >>Let me try this way which will be saying too much already. If in a six >>numbers lottery, the numbers would be 2,4,6,8 for the forst four, you >>could know the next ones would be 8 and 10, if that lottery is rigged and >>the numbers spat by a puter program obeying to some sort of operation >>between the numbers. Any numbers rigged will have to have a sequence to them. >>The numbers seem to be toodifferent to be sequential to our eyes and >>brain. But not to a puter. Where poeple go wrong is trying to get the >>"trick" of the sequence. Not me. I just seek the number, who cares about >>the rule of the sequence. Poeple want the winning number, not the hidden >>trick, in the end! Then why guess the trick? >>You can probably earn a tidy income if you had any kind of winning >>> system (of any kind – luck/chance/probability/pyschic or otherwise). >>> But if you do win a great deal of money at it, chances are, they’ll spread >>> the news about you – so that you’ll be banned from all similar venues. >>Not immediately unless one is an idiot in fact. Not cool headed, and >>playing too close in time and space. Sure, after a while they would. But >>who needs to win all lotteries in the end? Jst one nice one is good >>enough, unless one excatly is stupid/greedy for nothing/addicted to >>winning up to managing to lose it all. >>:) >>hey most likely change the cheating sequence each x months. One can fall >>on that. But that is very lil risk for the investment and sure gain the >>next time. And I am not even sure they change the sequence until they >>woudl exactly suspect someone could have figured out, but not in the way I >>found, cause that will find it out the second they used the rigged way art >>least once or twice…One just has to keep track of the numbers that won >>before, and take it from there. >>Again, this is the method that someone else used, where it worked. They >>HAD to give him his last 3 millions in the end. Cause he did not cheat: >>the methd is useles *unless the casino DOES cheat* itself, where then one >>is sure to play honestly each time, and to in fact reveal that all they >>did was uncover the cheater: the casino itself. When that can be proven, >>and the method exactly is based on that and proves so then, Justice could >>only call cheater the casino. But they would not. They’d say one of their >>chips is defective, doh;-). >>Lotteries third prizes or so are won by maffia poeple for money laundering. >>Not the jackpot. The jackpot is used as a distraction. >>But prizes that are still high, yet "nothing" compared to the jackpot and >>not paid attention to and names not so publicized at all, belong to the >>maffia, anywhere there is a casino/lottery of any substantial amount for a >>prize. >>Since they can know what number to tell their biys to play, where to win 5 >>on 6 or five on sicx plus bonus and be known to be the winner of the next >>5 on 6, says they gotta know the numbers ahead of time. >>Someimes someoen happens to accidnetally play the right 6 on 6 and bonus. >>The odds here are of 14 millions to one. The jackpot is far from won each >>time. Makes more laundering money for them… >>Little is it known that once, a man won three draws in a row. Another >>twit:). He was actually offered three millions as compensation for never >>playng again. That all made me think it then could only be rigged. Odds >>were so against that man winning again, we are talking the order of 14 >>millions times f 14 millions times fouteen millions times fourteen >>millions PLUS the usual odds against him, that for them to pay him to >>enever play again was itself not going with odds AT ALL. I then was sure >>it was rigged. >>The beauty of what I found is that it does not care about the method. >>Everyoen trying a superstitious way of finding a trick does try and find >>exactly the trick. But that is useless. One does not win by knowign the >>trick but knowing the winning numbers ahead of time. >>And that can be done as soon as the last draw numbers are out. >>Poeple for the few I said the way to, poeple I trusted woudl not go and do >>it, either because they blck at the ide of it being possible (usually that >>suffices:)), or because they just could not grasp it, never used it, for >>thinking "Nah…could not be rigged". Or "Could not work". >>And the rest donlt belive me cause I never played it myself. I foudn the >>next numbers ut without buying the ticket for it which of its own beats >>peope’s understanding, cause they would not be cool headed and are not, >>period:). And cause they can not grasp why oen that woudl be able to find >>out the numbers would not play them. >>I’m not the type that does things "just cause I can", I guess:) >>But I tell ya, the method is 100% sure, so long as a lottery or supposed >>random winning combination is in fact rigged. >>> There was a small time movie about someone counting cards/etc, I think it >>> was made in the 80s’? I remember seeing it on the TV, even though I
… read more »
Response:
In article <ct7uc4$qo…@theodyn.ncf.ca>, bc…@FreeNet.Carleton.CA says… – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text ->Your Name Here=Harvey (k…@ing.notin.aus) writes: >> In article <ct6kb1$no…@theodyn.ncf.ca>, bc…@FreeNet.Carleton.CA says… >>>> On the Thurs – this week, it’s going to show how those American students in >>>> mathematics managed to win lots of money from various casinos. >>>> I think it’s with Blackjack, using card counting and probabilities… >>>> It would be a clever detailed system of some sort. >>>> Harvey >>>The system in question, if the same as they had here, is basednot so much >>>on probability but on cunting that it is a fixed and tricked "game". >>>Compuerized trickery if you will. Where someoen finally tried my idea in >>>Montreal and won millions at the casino threre time in a row. The third >>>time, in a same evenign I think it was, they closed the casino down and >>>refused to pay him. >>>The guys simply wrote a lil program to know what woudl be the winnign thing >>>the next time. Wonlt give the deatils here, bt it is very simple in fact. >>>About 6 lines of programming at max:). >>>Later, when it was decsribed how the guy did it, I finally knew for a fact >>>he used my method. >>>The casino, to try and avoid being proven cheating, simpl said it was a >>>defective chip in their puters that made it so that :random" numbers were >>>not *really* random. It;s a complicated sequence, but I foudn how to break >>>it quite some years ago. In the 80s. I was thinkiing lottery then…. >>>Still am, but well, I dunno hwo to program in the new languages they have >>>today, and to try and ask someone to convert that woudl be like giving >>>them the fortune. Would take a cool head, and not many have that. Even >>>that twit blew it at the casino playing him self each time, the same >>>evening too. Like DOH, he coudl have ted various casinos in various >>>cities around the world, to avoid being spotted;-), and after making >>>reasonably well, have someone else play, then another, getting all his >>>friends and relatives rich and all that. But nooooo. He was too gredy and >>>not cold headed enough at all…. >>>Someone then offered him a job, paying him 100 thou a year. Bad choice, If >>>anyone understanding what this means can only act that stupidly with it, >>>then I;d not hire them at all….They’d lack coolness, nerve, ponderation and >>>good ole common sense. Amd all in all would show just too greedy to trust. >>>Ooops. Disconection warning. Better post as is… >> Basically if you have any kind of system that works… >> as regards casino games – you’ve got your part time job / or secondary >> income waiting for you. >> It is the allure of the casino and other gambling games (eg. Lotto) to >> make people think – oh, yes, try out any kind of system out on us, >> we’re betting on people wanting to do just that… >> But using any kind of formal ’system’ that does not rely upon ‘luck’ >> or ‘chance’ – such as taking note of counting cards, is highly frowned upon >> by them. >> The story would be – don’t get noticed by the casino or their staff, and >> only win enough so that ‘they’ don’t notice too much. >> Basically make a killing and don’t go back there, so soon… >No, you don’t "get" it at all here, cause I won;t give more details, but >this one is not at all cheating. It is exactly a method that would be >considered like any other, and that had the casino in Montreal closed a >few days, imagne that. Cause as much as the method is honest, it *proves >the cheating done by the casino*. So the player is not cheating,the >casino is, and the fact that they cheat is the constant that this >establishes, so to speak. Agaion, I don’t weanna say more as I consider it >a safe method. And it was tested, without playing the numbers it gave me, >and it worked. It is not a superstitious methd, but a logical one. Where >taken into consideration is the fact that the numbers are rigged. The giuy >that did it used that method exactly, if he made it way more complicated >for nothing, and again, won three times in a row, had won 8 millions that >night, where when he won the last three of them, they closed the casino. >An enquiry was made when the guy said how he did it, which went over >everyone’s head for how it would always work:). The casino as I said then >pretended that it must have been that their computer chips did not work. >It has nothig to do with cards at all, with cheating or anything. It is to >the contrary playing "against a cheater" and well, let me compare it to >figuring out how the cheater "thinks", which has nothing to do with it >either as there, some bluff. But it is entirely logical, leaves n room for >any random nothing in it. It is clear, certain, etc. >Let me try this way which will be saying too much already. If in a six >numbers lottery, the numbers would be 2,4,6,8 for the forst four, you >could know the next ones would be 8 and 10, if that lottery is rigged and >the numbers spat by a puter program obeying to some sort of operation >between the numbers. Any numbers rigged will have to have a sequence to them. >The numbers seem to be toodifferent to be sequential to our eyes and >brain. But not to a puter. Where poeple go wrong is trying to get the >"trick" of the sequence. Not me. I just seek the number, who cares about >the rule of the sequence. Poeple want the winning number, not the hidden >trick, in the end! Then why guess the trick? >You can probably earn a tidy income if you had any kind of winning >> system (of any kind – luck/chance/probability/pyschic or otherwise). >> But if you do win a great deal of money at it, chances are, they’ll spread >> the news about you – so that you’ll be banned from all similar venues. >Not immediately unless one is an idiot in fact. Not cool headed, and >playing too close in time and space. Sure, after a while they would. But >who needs to win all lotteries in the end? Jst one nice one is good >enough, unless one excatly is stupid/greedy for nothing/addicted to >winning up to managing to lose it all. >:) >hey most likely change the cheating sequence each x months. One can fall >on that. But that is very lil risk for the investment and sure gain the >next time. And I am not even sure they change the sequence until they >woudl exactly suspect someone could have figured out, but not in the way I >found, cause that will find it out the second they used the rigged way art >least once or twice…One just has to keep track of the numbers that won >before, and take it from there. >Again, this is the method that someone else used, where it worked. They >HAD to give him his last 3 millions in the end. Cause he did not cheat: >the methd is useles *unless the casino DOES cheat* itself, where then one >is sure to play honestly each time, and to in fact reveal that all they >did was uncover the cheater: the casino itself. When that can be proven, >and the method exactly is based on that and proves so then, Justice could >only call cheater the casino. But they would not. They’d say one of their >chips is defective, doh;-). >Lotteries third prizes or so are won by maffia poeple for money laundering. >Not the jackpot. The jackpot is used as a distraction. >But prizes that are still high, yet "nothing" compared to the jackpot and >not paid attention to and names not so publicized at all, belong to the >maffia, anywhere there is a casino/lottery of any substantial amount for a >prize. >Since they can know what number to tell their biys to play, where to win 5 >on 6 or five on sicx plus bonus and be known to be the winner of the next >5 on 6, says they gotta know the numbers ahead of time. >Someimes someoen happens to accidnetally play the right 6 on 6 and bonus. >The odds here are of 14 millions to one. The jackpot is far from won each >time. Makes more laundering money for them… >Little is it known that once, a man won three draws in a row. Another >twit:). He was actually offered three millions as compensation for never >playng again. That all made me think it then could only be rigged. Odds >were so against that man winning again, we are talking the order of 14 >millions times f 14 millions times fouteen millions times fourteen >millions PLUS the usual odds against him, that for them to pay him to >enever play again was itself not going with odds AT ALL. I then was sure >it was rigged. >The beauty of what I found is that it does not care about the method. >Everyoen trying a superstitious way of finding a trick does try and find >exactly the trick. But that is useless. One does not win by knowign the >trick but knowing the winning numbers ahead of time. >And that can be done as soon as the last draw numbers are out. >Poeple for the few I said the way to, poeple I trusted woudl not go and do >it, either because they blck at the ide of it being possible (usually that >suffices:)), or because they just could not grasp it, never used it, for >thinking "Nah…could not be rigged". Or "Could not work". >And the rest donlt belive me cause I never played it myself. I foudn the >next numbers ut without buying the ticket for it which of its own beats >peope’s understanding, cause they would not be cool headed and are not, >period:). And cause they can not grasp why oen that woudl be able to find >out the numbers would not play them. >I’m not the type that does things "just cause I can", I guess:) >But I tell ya, the method is 100% sure, so long as a lottery or supposed >random winning combination is in fact rigged. >> There was a small time movie about someone counting cards/etc, I think it >> was made in the 80s’? I remember seeing it on the TV, even though I wasn’t >> really watching anything at that time. It kinda struck me as how educational >> this movie was… >> I don’t have the memory to enable me to count cards, and I’m not a >> mathematical genuis to be able to use
… read more »
Response:
Your Name Here=Harvey (k…@ing.notin.aus) writes: – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -> In article <ct6kb1$no…@theodyn.ncf.ca>, bc…@FreeNet.Carleton.CA says… >>> On the Thurs – this week, it’s going to show how those American students in >>> mathematics managed to win lots of money from various casinos. >>> I think it’s with Blackjack, using card counting and probabilities… >>> It would be a clever detailed system of some sort. >>> Harvey >>The system in question, if the same as they had here, is basednot so much >>on probability but on cunting that it is a fixed and tricked "game". >>Compuerized trickery if you will. Where someoen finally tried my idea in >>Montreal and won millions at the casino threre time in a row. The third >>time, in a same evenign I think it was, they closed the casino down and >>refused to pay him. >>The guys simply wrote a lil program to know what woudl be the winnign thing >>the next time. Wonlt give the deatils here, bt it is very simple in fact. >>About 6 lines of programming at max:). >>Later, when it was decsribed how the guy did it, I finally knew for a fact >>he used my method. >>The casino, to try and avoid being proven cheating, simpl said it was a >>defective chip in their puters that made it so that :random" numbers were >>not *really* random. It;s a complicated sequence, but I foudn how to break >>it quite some years ago. In the 80s. I was thinkiing lottery then…. >>Still am, but well, I dunno hwo to program in the new languages they have >>today, and to try and ask someone to convert that woudl be like giving >>them the fortune. Would take a cool head, and not many have that. Even >>that twit blew it at the casino playing him self each time, the same >>evening too. Like DOH, he coudl have ted various casinos in various >>cities around the world, to avoid being spotted;-), and after making >>reasonably well, have someone else play, then another, getting all his >>friends and relatives rich and all that. But nooooo. He was too gredy and >>not cold headed enough at all…. >>Someone then offered him a job, paying him 100 thou a year. Bad choice, If >>anyone understanding what this means can only act that stupidly with it, >>then I;d not hire them at all….They’d lack coolness, nerve, ponderation and >>good ole common sense. Amd all in all would show just too greedy to trust. >>Ooops. Disconection warning. Better post as is… > Basically if you have any kind of system that works… > as regards casino games – you’ve got your part time job / or secondary > income waiting for you. > It is the allure of the casino and other gambling games (eg. Lotto) to > make people think – oh, yes, try out any kind of system out on us, > we’re betting on people wanting to do just that… > But using any kind of formal ’system’ that does not rely upon ‘luck’ > or ‘chance’ – such as taking note of counting cards, is highly frowned upon > by them. > The story would be – don’t get noticed by the casino or their staff, and > only win enough so that ‘they’ don’t notice too much. > Basically make a killing and don’t go back there, so soon…
No, you don’t "get" it at all here, cause I won;t give more details, but this one is not at all cheating. It is exactly a method that would be considered like any other, and that had the casino in Montreal closed a few days, imagne that. Cause as much as the method is honest, it *proves the cheating done by the casino*. So the player is not cheating,the casino is, and the fact that they cheat is the constant that this establishes, so to speak. Agaion, I don’t weanna say more as I consider it a safe method. And it was tested, without playing the numbers it gave me, and it worked. It is not a superstitious methd, but a logical one. Where taken into consideration is the fact that the numbers are rigged. The giuy that did it used that method exactly, if he made it way more complicated for nothing, and again, won three times in a row, had won 8 millions that night, where when he won the last three of them, they closed the casino. An enquiry was made when the guy said how he did it, which went over everyone’s head for how it would always work:). The casino as I said then pretended that it must have been that their computer chips did not work. It has nothig to do with cards at all, with cheating or anything. It is to the contrary playing "against a cheater" and well, let me compare it to figuring out how the cheater "thinks", which has nothing to do with it either as there, some bluff. But it is entirely logical, leaves n room for any random nothing in it. It is clear, certain, etc. Let me try this way which will be saying too much already. If in a six numbers lottery, the numbers would be 2,4,6,8 for the forst four, you could know the next ones would be 8 and 10, if that lottery is rigged and the numbers spat by a puter program obeying to some sort of operation between the numbers. Any numbers rigged will have to have a sequence to them. The numbers seem to be toodifferent to be sequential to our eyes and brain. But not to a puter. Where poeple go wrong is trying to get the "trick" of the sequence. Not me. I just seek the number, who cares about the rule of the sequence. Poeple want the winning number, not the hidden trick, in the end! Then why guess the trick? > > You can probably earn a tidy income if you had any kind of winning > system (of any kind – luck/chance/probability/pyschic or otherwise). > But if you do win a great deal of money at it, chances are, they’ll spread > the news about you – so that you’ll be banned from all similar venues.
Not immediately unless one is an idiot in fact. Not cool headed, and playing too close in time and space. Sure, after a while they would. But who needs to win all lotteries in the end? Jst one nice one is good enough, unless one excatly is stupid/greedy for nothing/addicted to winning up to managing to lose it all. 
hey most likely change the cheating sequence each x months. One can fall on that. But that is very lil risk for the investment and sure gain the next time. And I am not even sure they change the sequence until they woudl exactly suspect someone could have figured out, but not in the way I found, cause that will find it out the second they used the rigged way art least once or twice…One just has to keep track of the numbers that won before, and take it from there. Again, this is the method that someone else used, where it worked. They HAD to give him his last 3 millions in the end. Cause he did not cheat: the methd is useles *unless the casino DOES cheat* itself, where then one is sure to play honestly each time, and to in fact reveal that all they did was uncover the cheater: the casino itself. When that can be proven, and the method exactly is based on that and proves so then, Justice could only call cheater the casino. But they would not. They’d say one of their chips is defective, doh;-). Lotteries third prizes or so are won by maffia poeple for money laundering. Not the jackpot. The jackpot is used as a distraction. But prizes that are still high, yet "nothing" compared to the jackpot and not paid attention to and names not so publicized at all, belong to the maffia, anywhere there is a casino/lottery of any substantial amount for a prize. Since they can know what number to tell their biys to play, where to win 5 on 6 or five on sicx plus bonus and be known to be the winner of the next 5 on 6, says they gotta know the numbers ahead of time. Someimes someoen happens to accidnetally play the right 6 on 6 and bonus. The odds here are of 14 millions to one. The jackpot is far from won each time. Makes more laundering money for them… Little is it known that once, a man won three draws in a row. Another twit:). He was actually offered three millions as compensation for never playng again. That all made me think it then could only be rigged. Odds were so against that man winning again, we are talking the order of 14 millions times f 14 millions times fouteen millions times fourteen millions PLUS the usual odds against him, that for them to pay him to enever play again was itself not going with odds AT ALL. I then was sure it was rigged. The beauty of what I found is that it does not care about the method. Everyoen trying a superstitious way of finding a trick does try and find exactly the trick. But that is useless. One does not win by knowign the trick but knowing the winning numbers ahead of time. And that can be done as soon as the last draw numbers are out. Poeple for the few I said the way to, poeple I trusted woudl not go and do it, either because they blck at the ide of it being possible (usually that suffices:)), or because they just could not grasp it, never used it, for thinking "Nah…could not be rigged". Or "Could not work". And the rest donlt belive me cause I never played it myself. I foudn the next numbers ut without buying the ticket for it which of its own beats peope’s understanding, cause they would not be cool headed and are not, period:). And cause they can not grasp why oen that woudl be able to find out the numbers would not play them. I’m not the type that does things "just cause I can", I guess:) But I tell ya, the method is 100% sure, so long as a lottery or supposed random winning combination is in fact rigged. > – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -> There was a small time movie about someone counting cards/etc, I think it > was made in the 80s’? I remember seeing it on the TV, even though I wasn’t > really watching anything at that time. It kinda struck me as how educational > this movie was… > I don’t have the memory to enable me to count cards, and I’m not a > mathematical genuis to be able to use probability, nor am I psychic to be > able to act on the correct ‘hunch’ to win at any game – and I don’t have the > luck to win anyway. > But if I had a system that did work – I would use it, set up some independent > steady allowance system so that I can do whatever I
… read more »
Response:
In article <ct6kb1$no…@theodyn.ncf.ca>, bc…@FreeNet.Carleton.CA says… – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text ->> On the Thurs – this week, it’s going to show how those American students in >> mathematics managed to win lots of money from various casinos. >> I think it’s with Blackjack, using card counting and probabilities… >> It would be a clever detailed system of some sort. >> Harvey >The system in question, if the same as they had here, is basednot so much >on probability but on cunting that it is a fixed and tricked "game". >Compuerized trickery if you will. Where someoen finally tried my idea in >Montreal and won millions at the casino threre time in a row. The third >time, in a same evenign I think it was, they closed the casino down and >refused to pay him. >The guys simply wrote a lil program to know what woudl be the winnign thing >the next time. Wonlt give the deatils here, bt it is very simple in fact. >About 6 lines of programming at max:). >Later, when it was decsribed how the guy did it, I finally knew for a fact >he used my method. >The casino, to try and avoid being proven cheating, simpl said it was a >defective chip in their puters that made it so that :random" numbers were >not *really* random. It;s a complicated sequence, but I foudn how to break >it quite some years ago. In the 80s. I was thinkiing lottery then…. >Still am, but well, I dunno hwo to program in the new languages they have >today, and to try and ask someone to convert that woudl be like giving >them the fortune. Would take a cool head, and not many have that. Even >that twit blew it at the casino playing him self each time, the same >evening too. Like DOH, he coudl have ted various casinos in various >cities around the world, to avoid being spotted;-), and after making >reasonably well, have someone else play, then another, getting all his >friends and relatives rich and all that. But nooooo. He was too gredy and >not cold headed enough at all…. >Someone then offered him a job, paying him 100 thou a year. Bad choice, If >anyone understanding what this means can only act that stupidly with it, >then I;d not hire them at all….They’d lack coolness, nerve, ponderation and >good ole common sense. Amd all in all would show just too greedy to trust. >Ooops. Disconection warning. Better post as is…
Basically if you have any kind of system that works… as regards casino games – you’ve got your part time job / or secondary income waiting for you. It is the allure of the casino and other gambling games (eg. Lotto) to make people think – oh, yes, try out any kind of system out on us, we’re betting on people wanting to do just that… But using any kind of formal ’system’ that does not rely upon ‘luck’ or ‘chance’ – such as taking note of counting cards, is highly frowned upon by them. The story would be – don’t get noticed by the casino or their staff, and only win enough so that ‘they’ don’t notice too much. Basically make a killing and don’t go back there, so soon… You can probably earn a tidy income if you had any kind of winning system (of any kind – luck/chance/probability/pyschic or otherwise). But if you do win a great deal of money at it, chances are, they’ll spread the news about you – so that you’ll be banned from all similar venues. There was a small time movie about someone counting cards/etc, I think it was made in the 80s’? I remember seeing it on the TV, even though I wasn’t really watching anything at that time. It kinda struck me as how educational this movie was… I don’t have the memory to enable me to count cards, and I’m not a mathematical genuis to be able to use probability, nor am I psychic to be able to act on the correct ‘hunch’ to win at any game – and I don’t have the luck to win anyway. But if I had a system that did work – I would use it, set up some independent steady allowance system so that I can do whatever I like with my time, etc. And would try to pursue various things, I feel that needs to be done at this time – eg. raise peoples’ consciousness so that this world can be a more peaceful and quiet place to live in…. etc… Harvey
Response:
Your Name Here=Harvey (k…@ing.notin.aus) writes: – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -> In article <ct59qr$lv…@theodyn.ncf.ca>, bc…@FreeNet.Carleton.CA says… >>> And I worry about the drains around the house. There’s two not working. >>> One caters for down the roof, that goes into the front garden. A drainpipe >>> is blocked with stones, the pavement probably collapsed, blocking it, when >>> the pavement was redone years ago. Around the other side, probably the >>> same thing happened there too? I have to stick a hose in, and see if water >>> will clear it? Maybe it will? The blockage is in the footpath area, I can’t >>> get the local council to own up to repairing it. If it’s on the footpath – >>> it’s really ‘their’ fault when they did the paving work outside the > property. >>> If it was on this house’s property, I can see it’s clearly it’s the >>> owner’s responsibility. I just don’t have the money to get a drainlayer to >>> lay down two drain pipes into the footpath area. Hey, isn’t that the >>> ‘council’s’ area ot business to fix? Probably not, knowing how councils >>> usually deny their responsibility. I pay them so much each year for roading >>> work/maintenance anyway. At least I think I do – have to look at the rates >>> account details….. >>> Harvey >>I have a similar thing with a house main drain here. >>The drain blocks easily, and floods the basement. I then have to be very >>attentive to it, from floor washing water to bth water, i.e. to be sure >>nothing is blocked in the main drain so that no water messes happen in the >>basement. >>I am a tenant, not owner. The owner or landlord is supposed to be the one >>calling the city to ficx their part of the drsain, since the landlord >>claims it is not his part that blocks. Only, of course he does >>not….Because the bylaw has it that if the city comes over and finds that >>it is the landlord’s part, they chrage him and fine him on top for the >>trouble. So the landlord keeps pretending it is not his part, and does not >>call them, most propably knowing it indeed is his part of the drain that >>needs repairs. >>I tried calling the city myself, but they say that they can not take calls >>from tenants on those complaints. Has to be the landlord. I explained that >>the landlord was not calling since years, and would not call, as it >>ptobably was his side not working, which left me trapped with the bad >>drain and floods, insisting on how landlords could take advantage of that >>rule and actually seem to be doing. They were supposed to enquire about >>that and call me back. They never did. I left a few messages, reaching no >>one there after that point, and none were returned either. >>I can only think that the City finds advantageous to let landlords take >>advantage of the nonsensical bylaw, where they end up with no calls, >>landlords fearing it would be their part after all, and t pay high costs >>if the City ended up doing it. >>Just a ridiculous bureaucratic thing. >>But a basement I can nt unpack nor use. >>Perhaps if you let the gutters drain in the walk path, if that one is the >>city’s, they then would get to do something…?(??) >>C >>– > I was at this person’s flat – and I noticed that the cold water tap > was left running, full on, water was simply rushing out and going down the > drain. I said to the guy living there – hey! You ought to get that fixed! > I know he has problems with his landlord – that the place is very much > run down, even so, he should get the tap turned off somehow, and not let > it go on wasting incredible amounts of water. > It’s probably been weeks or months? With it like that… and probably > weeks or months before he got something done about it? > Of course, if he bothered to ring the city council water department, someone > would come around and turn it off – somehow. > All it would take, would be something to block the drain, and that flat > would be terribly flooded, and the whole situation made even worse. > To me, the whole situation was utterly stupid. Where was his sense? Gone? > I’m not too worried about the blocked drains of the house – mainly because > there is a slight downward slope such that the water goes away from the house, > when it rains/pours. If it was sloping the wrong way, such that water was > getting to the foundations/underside of the house – I would definitely get > onto it. Though I don’t have the money to pay for work to be done for it. > There’s always maintenance to be done on some part of the house. > Next week there is a television program about the tsunami, in which it shows > what did happen .. as regards how it all began and developed… etc… > On the Thurs – this week, it’s going to show how those American students in > mathematics managed to win lots of money from various casinos. > I think it’s with Blackjack, using card counting and probabilities… > It would be a clever detailed system of some sort. > Harvey
The system in question, if the same as they had here, is basednot so much on probability but on cunting that it is a fixed and tricked "game". Compuerized trickery if you will. Where someoen finally tried my idea in Montreal and won millions at the casino threre time in a row. The third time, in a same evenign I think it was, they closed the casino down and refused to pay him. The guys simply wrote a lil program to know what woudl be the winnign thing the next time. Wonlt give the deatils here, bt it is very simple in fact. About 6 lines of programming at max:). Later, when it was decsribed how the guy did it, I finally knew for a fact he used my method. The casino, to try and avoid being proven cheating, simpl said it was a defective chip in their puters that made it so that :random" numbers were not *really* random. It;s a complicated sequence, but I foudn how to break it quite some years ago. In the 80s. I was thinkiing lottery then…. Still am, but well, I dunno hwo to program in the new languages they have today, and to try and ask someone to convert that woudl be like giving them the fortune. Would take a cool head, and not many have that. Even that twit blew it at the casino playing him self each time, the same evening too. Like DOH, he coudl have ted various casinos in various cities around the world, to avoid being spotted;-), and after making reasonably well, have someone else play, then another, getting all his friends and relatives rich and all that. But nooooo. He was too gredy and not cold headed enough at all…. Someone then offered him a job, paying him 100 thou a year. Bad choice, If anyone understanding what this means can only act that stupidly with it, then I;d not hire them at all….They’d lack coolness, nerve, ponderation and good ole common sense. Amd all in all would show just too greedy to trust. Ooops. Disconection warning. Better post as is… > > > —
Response:
In article <ct59qr$lv…@theodyn.ncf.ca>, bc…@FreeNet.Carleton.CA says… – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text ->> And I worry about the drains around the house. There’s two not working. >> One caters for down the roof, that goes into the front garden. A drainpipe >> is blocked with stones, the pavement probably collapsed, blocking it, when >> the pavement was redone years ago. Around the other side, probably the >> same thing happened there too? I have to stick a hose in, and see if water >> will clear it? Maybe it will? The blockage is in the footpath area, I can’t >> get the local council to own up to repairing it. If it’s on the footpath – >> it’s really ‘their’ fault when they did the paving work outside the property. >> If it was on this house’s property, I can see it’s clearly it’s the >> owner’s responsibility. I just don’t have the money to get a drainlayer to >> lay down two drain pipes into the footpath area. Hey, isn’t that the >> ‘council’s’ area ot business to fix? Probably not, knowing how councils >> usually deny their responsibility. I pay them so much each year for roading >> work/maintenance anyway. At least I think I do – have to look at the rates >> account details….. >> Harvey >I have a similar thing with a house main drain here. >The drain blocks easily, and floods the basement. I then have to be very >attentive to it, from floor washing water to bth water, i.e. to be sure >nothing is blocked in the main drain so that no water messes happen in the >basement. >I am a tenant, not owner. The owner or landlord is supposed to be the one >calling the city to ficx their part of the drsain, since the landlord >claims it is not his part that blocks. Only, of course he does >not….Because the bylaw has it that if the city comes over and finds that >it is the landlord’s part, they chrage him and fine him on top for the >trouble. So the landlord keeps pretending it is not his part, and does not >call them, most propably knowing it indeed is his part of the drain that >needs repairs. >I tried calling the city myself, but they say that they can not take calls >from tenants on those complaints. Has to be the landlord. I explained that >the landlord was not calling since years, and would not call, as it >ptobably was his side not working, which left me trapped with the bad >drain and floods, insisting on how landlords could take advantage of that >rule and actually seem to be doing. They were supposed to enquire about >that and call me back. They never did. I left a few messages, reaching no >one there after that point, and none were returned either. >I can only think that the City finds advantageous to let landlords take >advantage of the nonsensical bylaw, where they end up with no calls, >landlords fearing it would be their part after all, and t pay high costs >if the City ended up doing it. >Just a ridiculous bureaucratic thing. >But a basement I can nt unpack nor use. >Perhaps if you let the gutters drain in the walk path, if that one is the >city’s, they then would get to do something…?(??) >C >–
I was at this person’s flat – and I noticed that the cold water tap was left running, full on, water was simply rushing out and going down the drain. I said to the guy living there – hey! You ought to get that fixed! I know he has problems with his landlord – that the place is very much run down, even so, he should get the tap turned off somehow, and not let it go on wasting incredible amounts of water. It’s probably been weeks or months? With it like that… and probably weeks or months before he got something done about it? Of course, if he bothered to ring the city council water department, someone would come around and turn it off – somehow. All it would take, would be something to block the drain, and that flat would be terribly flooded, and the whole situation made even worse. To me, the whole situation was utterly stupid. Where was his sense? Gone? I’m not too worried about the blocked drains of the house – mainly because there is a slight downward slope such that the water goes away from the house, when it rains/pours. If it was sloping the wrong way, such that water was getting to the foundations/underside of the house – I would definitely get onto it. Though I don’t have the money to pay for work to be done for it. There’s always maintenance to be done on some part of the house. Next week there is a television program about the tsunami, in which it shows what did happen .. as regards how it all began and developed… etc… On the Thurs – this week, it’s going to show how those American students in mathematics managed to win lots of money from various casinos. I think it’s with Blackjack, using card counting and probabilities… It would be a clever detailed system of some sort. Harvey
Response:
Your Name Here=Harvey (k…@ing.notin.aus) writes: – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -> In article <ct4b61$17…@theodyn.ncf.ca>, bc…@FreeNet.Carleton.CA says… >>Your Name Here=Harvey (k…@ing.notin.aus) writes: >>> In article <ct2nqk$n9…@theodyn.ncf.ca>, bc…@FreeNet.Carleton.CA says… >>>>Your Name Here=Harvey (k…@ing.notin.aus) writes: >>>>> Meier is the prophet of this time, and being closer to the events than >>>>> Cayce/Nostradamus – me thinks his source is more reliable? >>>>> Anyway – what to watch out for – is for any eruption or activity from >>>>> Mt.Vesuvius – this will herald the unthinkable — starting of WWWIII. >>>>> It will be manmade ‘firestorms’ – which are highly secret at the moment, >>>>> which will cause a chain reaction in the atmosphere. >>>>> The only safe places will be Peru and Australia. >>>>> Expect the USA to become a major target and 2/3rd of mankind to be wiped >>> out. >>>>> If this doesn’t happen before 2012 – then we can all breathe a sign of >>>>> relief, that humanity has been spared (this time round). >>>>> There were times during the late 70s’ and 80s’ when we were spared too? >>>>> I don’t wish for such catastrophes to happen – but the message that > should >>>>> be sent to the politicians and the military – is any acts of aggression >>>>> should not be taken. Particularly the USA to withdraw from it’s current >>>>> reign of terror and control. It is better for the USA to not act like > some >>>>> stupid policeman of the world, but to let what happens happen. >>>>> If China went on some invasion spree – that would be the time to act, > only >>>>> when such acts are seen to be carried out, and imminent. >>>>> A very experienced airline pilot said of 9/11 — that those guys who >>>>> flew those planes didn’t just go on some Cessna training program, but > must >>>>> have flew in the proper simulators for the particular aircraft that they >>>>> flew, for such accuracy in those crashes. Particularly the Pentagon hit >>>>> at ground level, would have been extremely difficult, even for a trained >>>>> pilot as himself (who’s had a lifetime of experience). >>>>> And would have spent a great number of hours in the simulator too. >>>>> That same person, thinks Bin Laden did not plan the 9/11 sabotage as >>>>> the media presents — but that the blame was put on Bin Laden. >>>>> Some sort of USA covert plot to fool the public about who is controlling >>>>> what? I am very suspicious about all this myself >>>>> As an aside – I mispelled supereme last time, because I forget how to >>>>> spell words I hardly use… should have been ’supreme’… >>>>> Your winter is far colder than over here. >>>>> Being surrounded by ocean – means we don’t get the harsh winters, like > you >>>>> do. Whereas you’re surrounded by a huge continent, which ensures you do > get >>>>> the cold. >>>>> The west coast of Indonesia is a long long ways from here. >>>>> A few years back there was a Tsunami near New Guinea – and that caused >>>>> disruption there, but that was only nearby a sparsely populated area. >>>>> An early warning Tsunami system, would simply be – to watch how animals >>>>> react – you and your household would do that? But I guess the native >>> animals >>>>> of the local area, would be better? >>>>> Harvey >>>>Ah, then the Tsunami wave stopped "in Australia", so to speak, and did not >>>>bring changes of any kind where you are? Good to know. >>>>They showed images of how the coast of Australia was flooded, streets >>>>under what seemed to be 4 ft of water. I then wondered if it touched your >>>>country too, since to someone at my end of the globe, or at least to me, >>>>your country and Australia seem close enough, on the map. >>>>Quebec’s East coast is on the Atlantic, if its lower part of the coast is >>>>yet met only by soft water. The sea turns into the St-Laurence river, over >>>>the Gaspesie peninsula of Quebec, where the St-Laurence River is what >>>>enters between the penisnsula and the rest of that lower part of Quebec: >>>>soft water then. >>>>Quebec also holds in its land one third of all the soft water in the world. >>>>The more you go North, the more the number of lakes, if the Great Lakes >>>>are South theemself. >>>>In the area where I live, South West of Quebec, just on the boraderline to >>>>Ontario, where I cross the brodge between the two cities each weekday for >>>>work, there is so much water that it makes us the most humid area of > Canada. >>>>So water *does* affect our climate much, from the sea, and even from the >>>>Pacific one, as in from BC to Quebec, and from our lakes and rivers, wehre >>>>some of our lakes and rivers are mistaken for the sea by tourists, as they >>>>are way more massive bodies of water than their rivers and lakes. >>>>So one third of the soft water in the world in one province, plus the >>>>coast being on the sea, plus the opther end of the country being on the >>>>Pacific coast and lettign the winds fly right through due to the flat >>>>praries of the western provinces, once passed the rockies of course, makes >>>>us very subjected to changes in weather due to all those bodies of water >>>>and all that geography. >>>>The area where I live is also a valley. Mountains around are small, as we >>>>have the end of two huge chains of moutians, the end being always smaller >>>>than the middle of the chains. But the valley tnds to make the humidity be >>>>trapped in… >>>>C >>> There was no damage at all to Australia due to the Boxing Day Tsunami in >>> West Indonesia – no flooding at all, etc. >>They showed it tat very day as being part of it. Maybe theypried the >>report to try and make it look like part of it. But they showed mostly Sri >>Lanka, and then had a few images of here and there, among which were mages >>of some Austraalian city, with many feet of water over the sterrts, houses >>flooded and all,where it was presented as if it had happened at a similar >>time. >>> There is only flooding in Australia recently in the news, which of course >>> is not to the Tsunami at all. >>> But at the time, only an astute fisherman may have noticed the usual >>> tidal change in Australia and New Zealand, etc. >>Perhaps animals for some might have sensed it. But from all I heard, it >>was unforseen, unpredctable, and no signs were given at all before, where >>even scientists working in seismography were puzzled and shocked that it >>could have happened without any warning of any kind. >>> There was a series of small earthquakes in the Wellington/New Zealand >>> area recently – which set people on edge [as people are always warned of > the >>> big ‘one’ – Wellington city being on a fault line. New buildings are >>> always designed with a big earthquake in mind, there. To be able to > withstand >>> such vibrations. >>> I didn’t feel the recent Wellington shakes, but have felt ones north and > west >>> at other times. >>With the floor of the sea being so changed so suddenly, such things are >>not only plausoble but quite possible/in the line of probabilities. >>If not right no,w, later the earth has to settle, and what took centuries >>to pack tight will not have packed in its new "bed" overnight. Slides >>will occur. What remains unknown is if the slides will remain under the >>sea, or if it will end up affecting the "land" as well… >>epends on what slides how much when, I guess, i.e. at what speed: >>gradually or suddenly. Given the mass moved, I would say that when it >>would slide, it would be quite sudden, at least for some parts. Again, >>those might be noticeable only at the bottom of ther sea….But maybe not >>either. >>> We do get earthquake shakes in this part of the world, with the house >>> appearing to move, like some gentle giant is moving the house a little. >>> Some houses of the roughcast construction (once a wooden house, then >>> covered with a mortar mix over it, afterwards) do show cracks from such >>> shakes, as do pavements, etc. >>We had a few quakes in this area, even in the 6.2s. But the entire place >>being built on massive rock, no one ever got to fear earthquakes much >>here…. >>I remember the 6.2 one. Kiddo was eight and we were working at his >>lessons, with me drilling him for a test in school the next day…. >>His chair legs started to knock on the floor….and then I noticed he was >>moving while sitting still on the chair. And the next thing I knew, I too >>was moving and we were getting forther and further apart, the vibration >>making both our chairs move in opposite directions, where I clicked >>finally and as he said "What’s doing this?" I happened to say >>"Earthquake…It’s an earthquake! But we did not have tme to get anywhere. >>It lasted about 30 seconds, then went away….We noticed that the table >>had moved a few feet, like us, in its own direction, and giggled. >>I remember one of 5.6, when he was about 4-5. >>It was night time. My bfriend was asleep and so was kiddo -and so was I. >>In my sleep still, I sat straight up, got up,. fighting heavy sleep, >>walked over the bfriend after shaking him up, and walking directly to >>kiddo;s room as fast as I could where I grabbed him still zomby like, >>fighting a deep rem mode with all my strenght, where I coudl not talk or >>say anythign to the bfriend that as asking me laughing, thinking I was >>just sleepwalking what I was doing. >>I got back through the living room where the bfriend and I had fllen >>asleep, and carried my son, alseep, in a blanket I had wrapped around him >>and was heading for the door, to get OUT. >>The bfriend stopped me and asked, shaking me a bit t wake me up "What are >>you doing???? LOL!! You are sleewalking and going outdoors in the dead of >>the night with your kid! Wake up!!!" >>I coudl finally utter "Earthquake. We must get out. Bad
… read more »
Response:
In article <ct4b61$17…@theodyn.ncf.ca>, bc…@FreeNet.Carleton.CA says… – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text ->Your Name Here=Harvey (k…@ing.notin.aus) writes: >> In article <ct2nqk$n9…@theodyn.ncf.ca>, bc…@FreeNet.Carleton.CA says… >>>Your Name Here=Harvey (k…@ing.notin.aus) writes: >>>> Meier is the prophet of this time, and being closer to the events than >>>> Cayce/Nostradamus – me thinks his source is more reliable? >>>> Anyway – what to watch out for – is for any eruption or activity from >>>> Mt.Vesuvius – this will herald the unthinkable — starting of WWWIII. >>>> It will be manmade ‘firestorms’ – which are highly secret at the moment, >>>> which will cause a chain reaction in the atmosphere. >>>> The only safe places will be Peru and Australia. >>>> Expect the USA to become a major target and 2/3rd of mankind to be wiped >> out. >>>> If this doesn’t happen before 2012 – then we can all breathe a sign of >>>> relief, that humanity has been spared (this time round). >>>> There were times during the late 70s’ and 80s’ when we were spared too? >>>> I don’t wish for such catastrophes to happen – but the message that should >>>> be sent to the politicians and the military – is any acts of aggression >>>> should not be taken. Particularly the USA to withdraw from it’s current >>>> reign of terror and control. It is better for the USA to not act like some >>>> stupid policeman of the world, but to let what happens happen. >>>> If China went on some invasion spree – that would be the time to act, only >>>> when such acts are seen to be carried out, and imminent. >>>> A very experienced airline pilot said of 9/11 — that those guys who >>>> flew those planes didn’t just go on some Cessna training program, but must >>>> have flew in the proper simulators for the particular aircraft that they >>>> flew, for such accuracy in those crashes. Particularly the Pentagon hit >>>> at ground level, would have been extremely difficult, even for a trained >>>> pilot as himself (who’s had a lifetime of experience). >>>> And would have spent a great number of hours in the simulator too. >>>> That same person, thinks Bin Laden did not plan the 9/11 sabotage as >>>> the media presents — but that the blame was put on Bin Laden. >>>> Some sort of USA covert plot to fool the public about who is controlling >>>> what? I am very suspicious about all this myself >>>> As an aside – I mispelled supereme last time, because I forget how to >>>> spell words I hardly use… should have been ’supreme’… >>>> Your winter is far colder than over here. >>>> Being surrounded by ocean – means we don’t get the harsh winters, like you >>>> do. Whereas you’re surrounded by a huge continent, which ensures you do get >>>> the cold. >>>> The west coast of Indonesia is a long long ways from here. >>>> A few years back there was a Tsunami near New Guinea – and that caused >>>> disruption there, but that was only nearby a sparsely populated area. >>>> An early warning Tsunami system, would simply be – to watch how animals >>>> react – you and your household would do that? But I guess the native >> animals >>>> of the local area, would be better? >>>> Harvey >>>Ah, then the Tsunami wave stopped "in Australia", so to speak, and did not >>>bring changes of any kind where you are? Good to know. >>>They showed images of how the coast of Australia was flooded, streets >>>under what seemed to be 4 ft of water. I then wondered if it touched your >>>country too, since to someone at my end of the globe, or at least to me, >>>your country and Australia seem close enough, on the map. >>>Quebec’s East coast is on the Atlantic, if its lower part of the coast is >>>yet met only by soft water. The sea turns into the St-Laurence river, over >>>the Gaspesie peninsula of Quebec, where the St-Laurence River is what >>>enters between the penisnsula and the rest of that lower part of Quebec: >>>soft water then. >>>Quebec also holds in its land one third of all the soft water in the world. >>>The more you go North, the more the number of lakes, if the Great Lakes >>>are South theemself. >>>In the area where I live, South West of Quebec, just on the boraderline to >>>Ontario, where I cross the brodge between the two cities each weekday for >>>work, there is so much water that it makes us the most humid area of Canada. >>>So water *does* affect our climate much, from the sea, and even from the >>>Pacific one, as in from BC to Quebec, and from our lakes and rivers, wehre >>>some of our lakes and rivers are mistaken for the sea by tourists, as they >>>are way more massive bodies of water than their rivers and lakes. >>>So one third of the soft water in the world in one province, plus the >>>coast being on the sea, plus the opther end of the country being on the >>>Pacific coast and lettign the winds fly right through due to the flat >>>praries of the western provinces, once passed the rockies of course, makes >>>us very subjected to changes in weather due to all those bodies of water >>>and all that geography. >>>The area where I live is also a valley. Mountains around are small, as we >>>have the end of two huge chains of moutians, the end being always smaller >>>than the middle of the chains. But the valley tnds to make the humidity be >>>trapped in… >>>C >> There was no damage at all to Australia due to the Boxing Day Tsunami in >> West Indonesia – no flooding at all, etc. >They showed it tat very day as being part of it. Maybe theypried the >report to try and make it look like part of it. But they showed mostly Sri >Lanka, and then had a few images of here and there, among which were mages >of some Austraalian city, with many feet of water over the sterrts, houses >flooded and all,where it was presented as if it had happened at a similar >time. >> There is only flooding in Australia recently in the news, which of course >> is not to the Tsunami at all. >> But at the time, only an astute fisherman may have noticed the usual >> tidal change in Australia and New Zealand, etc. >Perhaps animals for some might have sensed it. But from all I heard, it >was unforseen, unpredctable, and no signs were given at all before, where >even scientists working in seismography were puzzled and shocked that it >could have happened without any warning of any kind. >> There was a series of small earthquakes in the Wellington/New Zealand >> area recently – which set people on edge [as people are always warned of the >> big ‘one’ – Wellington city being on a fault line. New buildings are >> always designed with a big earthquake in mind, there. To be able to withstand >> such vibrations. >> I didn’t feel the recent Wellington shakes, but have felt ones north and west >> at other times. >With the floor of the sea being so changed so suddenly, such things are >not only plausoble but quite possible/in the line of probabilities. >If not right no,w, later the earth has to settle, and what took centuries >to pack tight will not have packed in its new "bed" overnight. Slides >will occur. What remains unknown is if the slides will remain under the >sea, or if it will end up affecting the "land" as well… >epends on what slides how much when, I guess, i.e. at what speed: >gradually or suddenly. Given the mass moved, I would say that when it >would slide, it would be quite sudden, at least for some parts. Again, >those might be noticeable only at the bottom of ther sea….But maybe not >either. >> We do get earthquake shakes in this part of the world, with the house >> appearing to move, like some gentle giant is moving the house a little. >> Some houses of the roughcast construction (once a wooden house, then >> covered with a mortar mix over it, afterwards) do show cracks from such >> shakes, as do pavements, etc. >We had a few quakes in this area, even in the 6.2s. But the entire place >being built on massive rock, no one ever got to fear earthquakes much >here…. >I remember the 6.2 one. Kiddo was eight and we were working at his >lessons, with me drilling him for a test in school the next day…. >His chair legs started to knock on the floor….and then I noticed he was >moving while sitting still on the chair. And the next thing I knew, I too >was moving and we were getting forther and further apart, the vibration >making both our chairs move in opposite directions, where I clicked >finally and as he said "What’s doing this?" I happened to say >"Earthquake…It’s an earthquake! But we did not have tme to get anywhere. >It lasted about 30 seconds, then went away….We noticed that the table >had moved a few feet, like us, in its own direction, and giggled. >I remember one of 5.6, when he was about 4-5. >It was night time. My bfriend was asleep and so was kiddo -and so was I. >In my sleep still, I sat straight up, got up,. fighting heavy sleep, >walked over the bfriend after shaking him up, and walking directly to >kiddo;s room as fast as I could where I grabbed him still zomby like, >fighting a deep rem mode with all my strenght, where I coudl not talk or >say anythign to the bfriend that as asking me laughing, thinking I was >just sleepwalking what I was doing. >I got back through the living room where the bfriend and I had fllen >asleep, and carried my son, alseep, in a blanket I had wrapped around him >and was heading for the door, to get OUT. >The bfriend stopped me and asked, shaking me a bit t wake me up "What are >you doing???? LOL!! You are sleewalking and going outdoors in the dead of >the night with your kid! Wake up!!!" >I coudl finally utter "Earthquake. We must get out. Bad earth wquake". >He never felt a thing, even then while it was still happening. >He made fun of me all day the next day, until he ehard the news and >learned that indeed there had been an earthqauke, and he had not felt it >one bit. >Hew kept repeating the same
… read more »
Response:
Your Name Here=Harvey (k…@ing.notin.aus) writes: – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -> In article <ct2nqk$n9…@theodyn.ncf.ca>, bc…@FreeNet.Carleton.CA says… >>Your Name Here=Harvey (k…@ing.notin.aus) writes: >>> Meier is the prophet of this time, and being closer to the events than >>> Cayce/Nostradamus – me thinks his source is more reliable? >>> Anyway – what to watch out for – is for any eruption or activity from >>> Mt.Vesuvius – this will herald the unthinkable — starting of WWWIII. >>> It will be manmade ‘firestorms’ – which are highly secret at the moment, >>> which will cause a chain reaction in the atmosphere. >>> The only safe places will be Peru and Australia. >>> Expect the USA to become a major target and 2/3rd of mankind to be wiped > out. >>> If this doesn’t happen before 2012 – then we can all breathe a sign of >>> relief, that humanity has been spared (this time round). >>> There were times during the late 70s’ and 80s’ when we were spared too? >>> I don’t wish for such catastrophes to happen – but the message that should >>> be sent to the politicians and the military – is any acts of aggression >>> should not be taken. Particularly the USA to withdraw from it’s current >>> reign of terror and control. It is better for the USA to not act like some >>> stupid policeman of the world, but to let what happens happen. >>> If China went on some invasion spree – that would be the time to act, only >>> when such acts are seen to be carried out, and imminent. >>> A very experienced airline pilot said of 9/11 — that those guys who >>> flew those planes didn’t just go on some Cessna training program, but must >>> have flew in the proper simulators for the particular aircraft that they >>> flew, for such accuracy in those crashes. Particularly the Pentagon hit >>> at ground level, would have been extremely difficult, even for a trained >>> pilot as himself (who’s had a lifetime of experience). >>> And would have spent a great number of hours in the simulator too. >>> That same person, thinks Bin Laden did not plan the 9/11 sabotage as >>> the media presents — but that the blame was put on Bin Laden. >>> Some sort of USA covert plot to fool the public about who is controlling >>> what? I am very suspicious about all this myself >>> As an aside – I mispelled supereme last time, because I forget how to >>> spell words I hardly use… should have been ’supreme’… >>> Your winter is far colder than over here. >>> Being surrounded by ocean – means we don’t get the harsh winters, like you >>> do. Whereas you’re surrounded by a huge continent, which ensures you do get >>> the cold. >>> The west coast of Indonesia is a long long ways from here. >>> A few years back there was a Tsunami near New Guinea – and that caused >>> disruption there, but that was only nearby a sparsely populated area. >>> An early warning Tsunami system, would simply be – to watch how animals >>> react – you and your household would do that? But I guess the native > animals >>> of the local area, would be better? >>> Harvey >>Ah, then the Tsunami wave stopped "in Australia", so to speak, and did not >>bring changes of any kind where you are? Good to know. >>They showed images of how the coast of Australia was flooded, streets >>under what seemed to be 4 ft of water. I then wondered if it touched your >>country too, since to someone at my end of the globe, or at least to me, >>your country and Australia seem close enough, on the map. >>Quebec’s East coast is on the Atlantic, if its lower part of the coast is >>yet met only by soft water. The sea turns into the St-Laurence river, over >>the Gaspesie peninsula of Quebec, where the St-Laurence River is what >>enters between the penisnsula and the rest of that lower part of Quebec: >>soft water then. >>Quebec also holds in its land one third of all the soft water in the world. >>The more you go North, the more the number of lakes, if the Great Lakes >>are South theemself. >>In the area where I live, South West of Quebec, just on the boraderline to >>Ontario, where I cross the brodge between the two cities each weekday for >>work, there is so much water that it makes us the most humid area of Canada. >>So water *does* affect our climate much, from the sea, and even from the >>Pacific one, as in from BC to Quebec, and from our lakes and rivers, wehre >>some of our lakes and rivers are mistaken for the sea by tourists, as they >>are way more massive bodies of water than their rivers and lakes. >>So one third of the soft water in the world in one province, plus the >>coast being on the sea, plus the opther end of the country being on the >>Pacific coast and lettign the winds fly right through due to the flat >>praries of the western provinces, once passed the rockies of course, makes >>us very subjected to changes in weather due to all those bodies of water >>and all that geography. >>The area where I live is also a valley. Mountains around are small, as we >>have the end of two huge chains of moutians, the end being always smaller >>than the middle of the chains. But the valley tnds to make the humidity be >>trapped in… >>C > There was no damage at all to Australia due to the Boxing Day Tsunami in > West Indonesia – no flooding at all, etc.
They showed it tat very day as being part of it. Maybe theypried the report to try and make it look like part of it. But they showed mostly Sri Lanka, and then had a few images of here and there, among which were mages of some Austraalian city, with many feet of water over the sterrts, houses flooded and all,where it was presented as if it had happened at a similar time. > There is only flooding in Australia recently in the news, which of course > is not to the Tsunami at all. > But at the time, only an astute fisherman may have noticed the usual > tidal change in Australia and New Zealand, etc.
Perhaps animals for some might have sensed it. But from all I heard, it was unforseen, unpredctable, and no signs were given at all before, where even scientists working in seismography were puzzled and shocked that it could have happened without any warning of any kind. > There was a series of small earthquakes in the Wellington/New Zealand > area recently – which set people on edge [as people are always warned of the > big ‘one’ – Wellington city being on a fault line. New buildings are > always designed with a big earthquake in mind, there. To be able to withstand > such vibrations. > I didn’t feel the recent Wellington shakes, but have felt ones north and west > at other times.
With the floor of the sea being so changed so suddenly, such things are not only plausoble but quite possible/in the line of probabilities. If not right no,w, later the earth has to settle, and what took centuries to pack tight will not have packed in its new "bed" overnight. Slides will occur. What remains unknown is if the slides will remain under the sea, or if it will end up affecting the "land" as well… epends on what slides how much when, I guess, i.e. at what speed: gradually or suddenly. Given the mass moved, I would say that when it would slide, it would be quite sudden, at least for some parts. Again, those might be noticeable only at the bottom of ther sea….But maybe not either. > > We do get earthquake shakes in this part of the world, with the house > appearing to move, like some gentle giant is moving the house a little. > Some houses of the roughcast construction (once a wooden house, then > covered with a mortar mix over it, afterwards) do show cracks from such > shakes, as do pavements, etc.
We had a few quakes in this area, even in the 6.2s. But the entire place being built on massive rock, no one ever got to fear earthquakes much here…. I remember the 6.2 one. Kiddo was eight and we were working at his lessons, with me drilling him for a test in school the next day…. His chair legs started to knock on the floor….and then I noticed he was moving while sitting still on the chair. And the next thing I knew, I too was moving and we were getting forther and further apart, the vibration making both our chairs move in opposite directions, where I clicked finally and as he said "What’s doing this?" I happened to say "Earthquake…It’s an earthquake! But we did not have tme to get anywhere. It lasted about 30 seconds, then went away….We noticed that the table had moved a few feet, like us, in its own direction, and giggled. I remember one of 5.6, when he was about 4-5. It was night time. My bfriend was asleep and so was kiddo -and so was I. In my sleep still, I sat straight up, got up,. fighting heavy sleep, walked over the bfriend after shaking him up, and walking directly to kiddo;s room as fast as I could where I grabbed him still zomby like, fighting a deep rem mode with all my strenght, where I coudl not talk or say anythign to the bfriend that as asking me laughing, thinking I was just sleepwalking what I was doing. I got back through the living room where the bfriend and I had fllen asleep, and carried my son, alseep, in a blanket I had wrapped around him and was heading for the door, to get OUT. The bfriend stopped me and asked, shaking me a bit t wake me up "What are you doing???? LOL!! You are sleewalking and going outdoors in the dead of the night with your kid! Wake up!!!" I coudl finally utter "Earthquake. We must get out. Bad earth wquake". He never felt a thing, even then while it was still happening. He made fun of me all day the next day, until he ehard the news and learned that indeed there had been an earthqauke, and he had not felt it one bit. Hew kept repeating the same question: how could I, sleepign as deeply as I did, feel that and react to wake him up and go fetch my son, when he felt nothing even when awake??? I kept sayng "I dunno. I just fet it and somehow knew what it was…The rest was maternal instinct and pilot mode, so asleep I … read more »
Response:
In article <ct2nqk$n9…@theodyn.ncf.ca>, bc…@FreeNet.Carleton.CA says… – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text ->Your Name Here=Harvey (k…@ing.notin.aus) writes: >> Meier is the prophet of this time, and being closer to the events than >> Cayce/Nostradamus – me thinks his source is more reliable? >> Anyway – what to watch out for – is for any eruption or activity from >> Mt.Vesuvius – this will herald the unthinkable — starting of WWWIII. >> It will be manmade ‘firestorms’ – which are highly secret at the moment, >> which will cause a chain reaction in the atmosphere. >> The only safe places will be Peru and Australia. >> Expect the USA to become a major target and 2/3rd of mankind to be wiped out. >> If this doesn’t happen before 2012 – then we can all breathe a sign of >> relief, that humanity has been spared (this time round). >> There were times during the late 70s’ and 80s’ when we were spared too? >> I don’t wish for such catastrophes to happen – but the message that should >> be sent to the politicians and the military – is any acts of aggression >> should not be taken. Particularly the USA to withdraw from it’s current >> reign of terror and control. It is better for the USA to not act like some >> stupid policeman of the world, but to let what happens happen. >> If China went on some invasion spree – that would be the time to act, only >> when such acts are seen to be carried out, and imminent. >> A very experienced airline pilot said of 9/11 — that those guys who >> flew those planes didn’t just go on some Cessna training program, but must >> have flew in the proper simulators for the particular aircraft that they >> flew, for such accuracy in those crashes. Particularly the Pentagon hit >> at ground level, would have been extremely difficult, even for a trained >> pilot as himself (who’s had a lifetime of experience). >> And would have spent a great number of hours in the simulator too. >> That same person, thinks Bin Laden did not plan the 9/11 sabotage as >> the media presents — but that the blame was put on Bin Laden. >> Some sort of USA covert plot to fool the public about who is controlling >> what? I am very suspicious about all this myself >> As an aside – I mispelled supereme last time, because I forget how to >> spell words I hardly use… should have been ’supreme’… >> Your winter is far colder than over here. >> Being surrounded by ocean – means we don’t get the harsh winters, like you >> do. Whereas you’re surrounded by a huge continent, which ensures you do get >> the cold. >> The west coast of Indonesia is a long long ways from here. >> A few years back there was a Tsunami near New Guinea – and that caused >> disruption there, but that was only nearby a sparsely populated area. >> An early warning Tsunami system, would simply be – to watch how animals >> react – you and your household would do that? But I guess the native animals >> of the local area, would be better? >> Harvey >Ah, then the Tsunami wave stopped "in Australia", so to speak, and did not >bring changes of any kind where you are? Good to know. >They showed images of how the coast of Australia was flooded, streets >under what seemed to be 4 ft of water. I then wondered if it touched your >country too, since to someone at my end of the globe, or at least to me, >your country and Australia seem close enough, on the map. >Quebec’s East coast is on the Atlantic, if its lower part of the coast is >yet met only by soft water. The sea turns into the St-Laurence river, over >the Gaspesie peninsula of Quebec, where the St-Laurence River is what >enters between the penisnsula and the rest of that lower part of Quebec: >soft water then. >Quebec also holds in its land one third of all the soft water in the world. >The more you go North, the more the number of lakes, if the Great Lakes >are South theemself. >In the area where I live, South West of Quebec, just on the boraderline to >Ontario, where I cross the brodge between the two cities each weekday for >work, there is so much water that it makes us the most humid area of Canada. >So water *does* affect our climate much, from the sea, and even from the >Pacific one, as in from BC to Quebec, and from our lakes and rivers, wehre >some of our lakes and rivers are mistaken for the sea by tourists, as they >are way more massive bodies of water than their rivers and lakes. >So one third of the soft water in the world in one province, plus the >coast being on the sea, plus the opther end of the country being on the >Pacific coast and lettign the winds fly right through due to the flat >praries of the western provinces, once passed the rockies of course, makes >us very subjected to changes in weather due to all those bodies of water >and all that geography. >The area where I live is also a valley. Mountains around are small, as we >have the end of two huge chains of moutians, the end being always smaller >than the middle of the chains. But the valley tnds to make the humidity be >trapped in… >C
There was no damage at all to Australia due to the Boxing Day Tsunami in West Indonesia – no flooding at all, etc. There is only flooding in Australia recently in the news, which of course is not to the Tsunami at all. But at the time, only an astute fisherman may have noticed the usual tidal change in Australia and New Zealand, etc. There was a series of small earthquakes in the Wellington/New Zealand area recently – which set people on edge [as people are always warned of the big ‘one’ – Wellington city being on a fault line. New buildings are always designed with a big earthquake in mind, there. To be able to withstand such vibrations. I didn’t feel the recent Wellington shakes, but have felt ones north and west at other times. We do get earthquake shakes in this part of the world, with the house appearing to move, like some gentle giant is moving the house a little. Some houses of the roughcast construction (once a wooden house, then covered with a mortar mix over it, afterwards) do show cracks from such shakes, as do pavements, etc. Harvey
Response:
Your Name Here=Harvey (k…@ing.notin.aus) writes: – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -> In article <ct02hm$l4…@theodyn.ncf.ca>, bc…@FreeNet.Carleton.CA says… >>Your Name Here=Harvey (k…@ing.notin.aus) writes: >>> In article <cstgo4$m4…@theodyn.ncf.ca>, bc…@FreeNet.Carleton.CA says… >>>>Your Name Here=Harvey (k…@ing.notin.aus) writes: >>>>> In article <css31d$jn…@theodyn.ncf.ca>, bc…@FreeNet.Carleton.CA > says… >>>>>>I’d like to bring one of them philosophers over here and sit them on a >>>>>>snow bank (rather ice banks this year), and ask them "Is it as Cold for >>>>>>you, dear?? Is "Hot" still relative???? Can you still claim you can not > say >>>>>>how cold this cold is for me right now? Fine. I will just wait till you > beg >>>>>>for mercy to let you indoors. THEN you’ll be as cold as me. Or rather as >>>>>>cold as I was before I got in. Or was it me that got indoors, since I am >>>>>>no the same one as the one who was cold just before outdoors for having >>>>>>lived another fraction in time? Maybe it ainlt me. Maybe you’ll knock at >>>>>>the wrong door. Maybe I just wonlt be there anymore to open. Someone new >>>>>>will look at you and not open for not knowing you, cause you wonlt be the >>>>>>same you as the you the oen that n longer is me knew or thought she knew >>>>>>in her illusion of reality out there in the hot-cold. >>>>>>C >>>>> Cold is relative. >>>>Gngngn….;-) >>>>Not in Gateau. The city plow rolled the last philosopher to the snow >>>>blower, yesterday… >>>>The crowd was deliriously happy, and "Relative *this*!!" fused from >>>>everywhere… >>>>> If you’re hungry and hadn’t much to eat at all – the cold will get to > you. >>>>> If you’ve played a good two hours of volleyball in which you enjoyed >>>>> yourself, your body temperature will be up, and your biological processes >>>>> in a heightened state of awareness – you’ll be OK for another two hours >>>>> in spite of the cold. >>>>And then die automatically as your nostrils and lips glue together on your >>> way >>>>back home. That is, two feet from the gym doors…;-) >>>>> I guess that’s why I look forward to playing a lot of volleyball during >>>>> winter – to chase those blues away… >>>>Good for you, your Warmthness!:) >>>>Just be sure to shove vaseline up your nose and on your lips before you >>>>leave the gym….;-) >>>>> I guess it’s a case of acknowledging it’s bloody cold! and then stop >>>>> moaning about it… >>>>Yup. You’re like me. You catch fast if moaned to slowly;-):) >>>> > It does get cold here — I wear thermal underwear, and at least two >>>>> layers of underwear, plus a scarf. That helps… >>>>And to think, *it is full summer* where you live!!!;-) >>> It hasn’t been much of a summer here, in this part of the world. >>I winder if this means our summer time will follow the same pattern. But >>then, your end of the world had it ever so so hard not long ago…. >>Where the entire planetary ground was more than just shaken… >>Telluric energy line must completely be changed…. >>Hey, you might wanna have a look at Cayce again and see which places he >>had said would be affected by seisms before/during the pole switches… >>I think eh said that it woudl be in such a seism that an Island woudl >>resurface and that that Island would be the lost Atlantis…But rather, >>I;d like to read what part of the world he had said woudl be affected by >>land slides and earthwuakes and so on, in these days, and check out how >>far off/on he was…. >>> It is hot today but over the official holiday period it’s been wet and > cool, >>> sometimes cold as in winter like coldness. Tourists have missed out on a >>> kiwi summer… same for a lot of kiwis too on their holiday. >>Do poeple there refer to themselves as "Kiwis"? Or is it just something >>that (some) tourists call them…? >>>>Imagine you’d be in winter, now…? Sheesh!;-):):) >>>>Must be hard to walk with 6 thermal underwears…Even more so when wearing >>>>them!:) >>>><having flashes of some super bundled team of players having a volleyball >>>>game, wearing a full lenght snow suit (each, hopefully…) to cover the 6 >>>>layers of Long John’s… >>>>Wonder if they’d have to do slow motion for the replays….?;-);-):):) >>> Nah, I don’t wear thermal underwear while playing volleyball – as I’ll >>> be sweating 1/2 through a game/etc. I put them back on hours afterwards. >>Here, as uch as you try and shower and dry tyourself after such an indoors >>sports in winter, or asmuch as you even try and skip the shower to not get >>even more wet/damp and ehad for home to have your shower there, as you >>woudl alk out of that gym in weather like e have since weeks, your hair >>woudl be frozen into ice just from the dampness of the sweat, and still if >>it was dripping wet, the whole water contents woud freeze solid instantly. >>I see it happen each day with my own hair. Got to be careful to then not >>touch it, as it actually might break like an icecicle, and leave you with >>a blad spot or shorter hair on one spot;-). As well, your nostrils DO glue >>together just from the hmidity contents of your own body, as you >>breath. Compare it to sticking your tongue on a railroad track in winter. >>Save that this time, you wish a train was comign to and it faster;-) >>Fortunately, thse severe colds only last a sdhort while. Usually two >>weeks. But "usually" is an odd average. Again, two years ago, it lasted 12 >>weeks, and had started in late January, after everyoen thought we’d have a >>record early spring. I also remember that the year my dad passed away, in >>Florida, we’d tell him on the phoen to not come back right away, that it >>still was 40 below here (sic). It was April 27 when he died. Almost May. >>nd I remember it was fourty below all right…I had no heating at all that >>year. Man, what awful winters those were… >>I remember other years when it lasted ""only"" six weeks but would be >>record colds, colder than ever. >>A normal winter here is "supposed" to be two straight weeks of weather in >>the 40 belows, with the occasional day at 50 below, from mid-end of >>January to beginging of February. >>This area is also known to be the most humid oen in Canada, and by far. >>Only, we were so used to it that we did not find it humid >>ourselves…Until the climate changes that started around ‘95. Man, what >>awful humidity levels. 95 was a summer with 100 percent humidity *all the >>time*. It woudl rain? No difference, it woudl remain 100 pecent humidity >>just the same! No one had airco in Canada then save Amerian restaurant >>chains and shoppign centres. That year, in June, airco was backorder until >>end of October…. >>It never went away since….It is as if the humidity levels tripled. I >>noticed many types of trees that never coudl grow here when I was a kid >>now propagating like bad weeds, and even eating our foests away, choking >>other trees. Exactly like bad weed…Animals are also lost at times… >>Bears not hibenating yet in Late December and coming in the cities to try >>and find food, scne all is covered in snow…Two years ago they ahd to >>kill many of them: they would shoot them with anesthetics, have them >>removed and taken firther n the national park, after marking them. But >>they coudl see the same ones would comeback, poor things, hungry like mad >>and going for garbage cans… >>I saw a fox not two weeks ago on some downtown bridge. This is never good. >>Means possible rabbies epidemic of major importance this spring… >>I gues the rain, as iced as it wsa, made them think it was spring time >>arriving…My own tyrtle did not prepare for hibernation as she usually >>did, and nwo comes out of hibernation each two three days, which I am sure >>must affect her entre metabolism…. >>Some birds known to fly south in winter I saw staying now….Maybe half of >>them would stay on some years… >>The same, I had noticed that big black crows had completely vanished since >>a decade or two and that no oen seemed to notice. In the last years, I saw >>them reapear. Even in winter! Crows used to be what woudl let us know >>spring was coming as they all flew South in winter…. >>We had a few years of the weather being milder in witner, if we no longer >>had springs anymore (cold and rainy until June 23 or so the last years, >>save last eyar which was a nice normal childhood dream like spring:), wit >>a completely rotten wet summer) . I guess the few mild springs, where >>three eyars ago it was 100 F on March 1 nd never went lower, summer being >>114 and up, plus awful humidex (sic) making it in the 120s:(, The mild >>springs made the birds be lost as to "shoud we leave or stay?" >>All in all, I don’t think it is a compass they have in their brain so much >>as a thermometer up their rear end;-). When the wind freezes your tail, >>you fly away from it, is what I think the entire theory is about;-). >>Strange changes we have…. >>I had lived long enough before 95 to know tht weather was not supposed to >>change patterns *that* fast. I amglad I was born in better weather days… >>I ust say that our winters, for the snow falls, and the lenght of time we >>have snw on the ground, are extremely shorter. It is more like their >>slowly stretchign over spring, no snow by May in any case:), though I >>remember snow falls on June 18 of 12 inches (sic) one childhood year, just >>on time for my summer chool break, bleh:). But our springs now usually are >>unexistent, and cold rains replaced them from sme time betweenthe end of >>snow falls till June 21-23, where it suddenly switches from 50 F o 114 >>plus humidex and stays humid to death, dripping wet humid, where even your >>clthes in your closet you can wring water out of, no kidding. Donme it for >>real. You get out of the shower and never dry. I once at in
… read more »
Response:
In article <ct02hm$l4…@theodyn.ncf.ca>, bc…@FreeNet.Carleton.CA says… – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text ->Your Name Here=Harvey (k…@ing.notin.aus) writes: >> In article <cstgo4$m4…@theodyn.ncf.ca>, bc…@FreeNet.Carleton.CA says… >>>Your Name Here=Harvey (k…@ing.notin.aus) writes: >>>> In article <css31d$jn…@theodyn.ncf.ca>, bc…@FreeNet.Carleton.CA says… >>>>>I’d like to bring one of them philosophers over here and sit them on a >>>>>snow bank (rather ice banks this year), and ask them "Is it as Cold for >>>>>you, dear?? Is "Hot" still relative???? Can you still claim you can not say >>>>>how cold this cold is for me right now? Fine. I will just wait till you beg >>>>>for mercy to let you indoors. THEN you’ll be as cold as me. Or rather as >>>>>cold as I was before I got in. Or was it me that got indoors, since I am >>>>>no the same one as the one who was cold just before outdoors for having >>>>>lived another fraction in time? Maybe it ainlt me. Maybe you’ll knock at >>>>>the wrong door. Maybe I just wonlt be there anymore to open. Someone new >>>>>will look at you and not open for not knowing you, cause you wonlt be the >>>>>same you as the you the oen that n longer is me knew or thought she knew >>>>>in her illusion of reality out there in the hot-cold. >>>>>C >>>> Cold is relative. >>>Gngngn….;-) >>>Not in Gateau. The city plow rolled the last philosopher to the snow >>>blower, yesterday… >>>The crowd was deliriously happy, and "Relative *this*!!" fused from >>>everywhere… >>>> If you’re hungry and hadn’t much to eat at all – the cold will get to you. >>>> If you’ve played a good two hours of volleyball in which you enjoyed >>>> yourself, your body temperature will be up, and your biological processes >>>> in a heightened state of awareness – you’ll be OK for another two hours >>>> in spite of the cold. >>>And then die automatically as your nostrils and lips glue together on your >> way >>>back home. That is, two feet from the gym doors…;-) >>>> I guess that’s why I look forward to playing a lot of volleyball during >>>> winter – to chase those blues away… >>>Good for you, your Warmthness!:) >>>Just be sure to shove vaseline up your nose and on your lips before you >>>leave the gym….;-) >>>> I guess it’s a case of acknowledging it’s bloody cold! and then stop >>>> moaning about it… >>>Yup. You’re like me. You catch fast if moaned to slowly;-):) >>> > It does get cold here — I wear thermal underwear, and at least two >>>> layers of underwear, plus a scarf. That helps… >>>And to think, *it is full summer* where you live!!!;-) >> It hasn’t been much of a summer here, in this part of the world. >I winder if this means our summer time will follow the same pattern. But >then, your end of the world had it ever so so hard not long ago…. >Where the entire planetary ground was more than just shaken… >Telluric energy line must completely be changed…. >Hey, you might wanna have a look at Cayce again and see which places he >had said would be affected by seisms before/during the pole switches… >I think eh said that it woudl be in such a seism that an Island woudl >resurface and that that Island would be the lost Atlantis…But rather, >I;d like to read what part of the world he had said woudl be affected by >land slides and earthwuakes and so on, in these days, and check out how >far off/on he was…. >> It is hot today but over the official holiday period it’s been wet and cool, >> sometimes cold as in winter like coldness. Tourists have missed out on a >> kiwi summer… same for a lot of kiwis too on their holiday. >Do poeple there refer to themselves as "Kiwis"? Or is it just something >that (some) tourists call them…? >>>Imagine you’d be in winter, now…? Sheesh!;-):):) >>>Must be hard to walk with 6 thermal underwears…Even more so when wearing >>>them!:) >>><having flashes of some super bundled team of players having a volleyball >>>game, wearing a full lenght snow suit (each, hopefully…) to cover the 6 >>>layers of Long John’s… >>>Wonder if they’d have to do slow motion for the replays….?;-);-):):) >> Nah, I don’t wear thermal underwear while playing volleyball – as I’ll >> be sweating 1/2 through a game/etc. I put them back on hours afterwards. >Here, as uch as you try and shower and dry tyourself after such an indoors >sports in winter, or asmuch as you even try and skip the shower to not get >even more wet/damp and ehad for home to have your shower there, as you >woudl alk out of that gym in weather like e have since weeks, your hair >woudl be frozen into ice just from the dampness of the sweat, and still if >it was dripping wet, the whole water contents woud freeze solid instantly. >I see it happen each day with my own hair. Got to be careful to then not >touch it, as it actually might break like an icecicle, and leave you with >a blad spot or shorter hair on one spot;-). As well, your nostrils DO glue >together just from the hmidity contents of your own body, as you >breath. Compare it to sticking your tongue on a railroad track in winter. >Save that this time, you wish a train was comign to and it faster;-) >Fortunately, thse severe colds only last a sdhort while. Usually two >weeks. But "usually" is an odd average. Again, two years ago, it lasted 12 >weeks, and had started in late January, after everyoen thought we’d have a >record early spring. I also remember that the year my dad passed away, in >Florida, we’d tell him on the phoen to not come back right away, that it >still was 40 below here (sic). It was April 27 when he died. Almost May. >nd I remember it was fourty below all right…I had no heating at all that >year. Man, what awful winters those were… >I remember other years when it lasted ""only"" six weeks but would be >record colds, colder than ever. >A normal winter here is "supposed" to be two straight weeks of weather in >the 40 belows, with the occasional day at 50 below, from mid-end of >January to beginging of February. >This area is also known to be the most humid oen in Canada, and by far. >Only, we were so used to it that we did not find it humid >ourselves…Until the climate changes that started around ‘95. Man, what >awful humidity levels. 95 was a summer with 100 percent humidity *all the >time*. It woudl rain? No difference, it woudl remain 100 pecent humidity >just the same! No one had airco in Canada then save Amerian restaurant >chains and shoppign centres. That year, in June, airco was backorder until >end of October…. >It never went away since….It is as if the humidity levels tripled. I >noticed many types of trees that never coudl grow here when I was a kid >now propagating like bad weeds, and even eating our foests away, choking >other trees. Exactly like bad weed…Animals are also lost at times… >Bears not hibenating yet in Late December and coming in the cities to try >and find food, scne all is covered in snow…Two years ago they ahd to >kill many of them: they would shoot them with anesthetics, have them >removed and taken firther n the national park, after marking them. But >they coudl see the same ones would comeback, poor things, hungry like mad >and going for garbage cans… >I saw a fox not two weeks ago on some downtown bridge. This is never good. >Means possible rabbies epidemic of major importance this spring… >I gues the rain, as iced as it wsa, made them think it was spring time >arriving…My own tyrtle did not prepare for hibernation as she usually >did, and nwo comes out of hibernation each two three days, which I am sure >must affect her entre metabolism…. >Some birds known to fly south in winter I saw staying now….Maybe half of >them would stay on some years… >The same, I had noticed that big black crows had completely vanished since >a decade or two and that no oen seemed to notice. In the last years, I saw >them reapear. Even in winter! Crows used to be what woudl let us know >spring was coming as they all flew South in winter…. >We had a few years of the weather being milder in witner, if we no longer >had springs anymore (cold and rainy until June 23 or so the last years, >save last eyar which was a nice normal childhood dream like spring:), wit >a completely rotten wet summer) . I guess the few mild springs, where >three eyars ago it was 100 F on March 1 nd never went lower, summer being >114 and up, plus awful humidex (sic) making it in the 120s:(, The mild >springs made the birds be lost as to "shoud we leave or stay?" >All in all, I don’t think it is a compass they have in their brain so much >as a thermometer up their rear end;-). When the wind freezes your tail, >you fly away from it, is what I think the entire theory is about;-). >Strange changes we have…. >I had lived long enough before 95 to know tht weather was not supposed to >change patterns *that* fast. I amglad I was born in better weather days… >I ust say that our winters, for the snow falls, and the lenght of time we >have snw on the ground, are extremely shorter. It is more like their >slowly stretchign over spring, no snow by May in any case:), though I >remember snow falls on June 18 of 12 inches (sic) one childhood year, just >on time for my summer chool break, bleh:). But our springs now usually are >unexistent, and cold rains replaced them from sme time betweenthe end of >snow falls till June 21-23, where it suddenly switches from 50 F o 114 >plus humidex and stays humid to death, dripping wet humid, where even your >clthes in your closet you can wring water out of, no kidding. Donme it for >real. You get out of the shower and never dry. I once at in front fo a >strong commercial fan I bought to try and dry after a shwer. Sittign right >in front of it with wind so strong the furniture almost moved;-). And I >still NEVER dried, as the air it threw on me was filled with humidity. >It even
… read more »
Response:
In article <cstgo4$m4…@theodyn.ncf.ca>, bc…@FreeNet.Carleton.CA says… – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text ->Your Name Here=Harvey (k…@ing.notin.aus) writes: >> In article <css31d$jn…@theodyn.ncf.ca>, bc…@FreeNet.Carleton.CA says… >>>I’d like to bring one of them philosophers over here and sit them on a >>>snow bank (rather ice banks this year), and ask them "Is it as Cold for >>>you, dear?? Is "Hot" still relative???? Can you still claim you can not say >>>how cold this cold is for me right now? Fine. I will just wait till you beg >>>for mercy to let you indoors. THEN you’ll be as cold as me. Or rather as >>>cold as I was before I got in. Or was it me that got indoors, since I am >>>no the same one as the one who was cold just before outdoors for having >>>lived another fraction in time? Maybe it ainlt me. Maybe you’ll knock at >>>the wrong door. Maybe I just wonlt be there anymore to open. Someone new >>>will look at you and not open for not knowing you, cause you wonlt be the >>>same you as the you the oen that n longer is me knew or thought she knew >>>in her illusion of reality out there in the hot-cold. >>>C >> Cold is relative. >Gngngn….;-) >Not in Gateau. The city plow rolled the last philosopher to the snow >blower, yesterday… >The crowd was deliriously happy, and "Relative *this*!!" fused from >everywhere… >> If you’re hungry and hadn’t much to eat at all – the cold will get to you. >> If you’ve played a good two hours of volleyball in which you enjoyed >> yourself, your body temperature will be up, and your biological processes >> in a heightened state of awareness – you’ll be OK for another two hours >> in spite of the cold. >And then die automatically as your nostrils and lips glue together on your way >back home. That is, two feet from the gym doors…;-) >> I guess that’s why I look forward to playing a lot of volleyball during >> winter – to chase those blues away… >Good for you, your Warmthness!:) >Just be sure to shove vaseline up your nose and on your lips before you >leave the gym….;-) >> I guess it’s a case of acknowledging it’s bloody cold! and then stop >> moaning about it… >Yup. You’re like me. You catch fast if moaned to slowly;-):) > > It does get cold here — I wear thermal underwear, and at least two >> layers of underwear, plus a scarf. That helps… >And to think, *it is full summer* where you live!!!;-)
It hasn’t been much of a summer here, in this part of the world. It is hot today but over the official holiday period it’s been wet and cool, sometimes cold as in winter like coldness. Tourists have missed out on a kiwi summer… same for a lot of kiwis too on their holiday. >Imagine you’d be in winter, now…? Sheesh!;-):):) >Must be hard to walk with 6 thermal underwears…Even more so when wearing >them!:) ><having flashes of some super bundled team of players having a volleyball >game, wearing a full lenght snow suit (each, hopefully…) to cover the 6 >layers of Long John’s… >Wonder if they’d have to do slow motion for the replays….?;-);-):):)
Nah, I don’t wear thermal underwear while playing volleyball – as I’ll be sweating 1/2 through a game/etc. I put them back on hours afterwards. >;-) >P.S.: >How do you think we invented hockey??;-) >We found the frozen head of a philosopher, and tried to kick it in the >snow blower’s "mouth", what else!;-) >:) >C > > > Harvey
Haven’t tried hockey, and ice hockey owuld be out of the question for me. As I can’t skate/etc. Harvey
Response:
Your Name Here=Harvey (k…@ing.notin.aus) writes: – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -> In article <cstgo4$m4…@theodyn.ncf.ca>, bc…@FreeNet.Carleton.CA says… >>Your Name Here=Harvey (k…@ing.notin.aus) writes: >>> In article <css31d$jn…@theodyn.ncf.ca>, bc…@FreeNet.Carleton.CA says… >>>>I’d like to bring one of them philosophers over here and sit them on a >>>>snow bank (rather ice banks this year), and ask them "Is it as Cold for >>>>you, dear?? Is "Hot" still relative???? Can you still claim you can not say >>>>how cold this cold is for me right now? Fine. I will just wait till you beg >>>>for mercy to let you indoors. THEN you’ll be as cold as me. Or rather as >>>>cold as I was before I got in. Or was it me that got indoors, since I am >>>>no the same one as the one who was cold just before outdoors for having >>>>lived another fraction in time? Maybe it ainlt me. Maybe you’ll knock at >>>>the wrong door. Maybe I just wonlt be there anymore to open. Someone new >>>>will look at you and not open for not knowing you, cause you wonlt be the >>>>same you as the you the oen that n longer is me knew or thought she knew >>>>in her illusion of reality out there in the hot-cold. >>>>C >>> Cold is relative. >>Gngngn….;-) >>Not in Gateau. The city plow rolled the last philosopher to the snow >>blower, yesterday… >>The crowd was deliriously happy, and "Relative *this*!!" fused from >>everywhere… >>> If you’re hungry and hadn’t much to eat at all – the cold will get to you. >>> If you’ve played a good two hours of volleyball in which you enjoyed >>> yourself, your body temperature will be up, and your biological processes >>> in a heightened state of awareness – you’ll be OK for another two hours >>> in spite of the cold. >>And then die automatically as your nostrils and lips glue together on your > way >>back home. That is, two feet from the gym doors…;-) >>> I guess that’s why I look forward to playing a lot of volleyball during >>> winter – to chase those blues away… >>Good for you, your Warmthness!:) >>Just be sure to shove vaseline up your nose and on your lips before you >>leave the gym….;-) >>> I guess it’s a case of acknowledging it’s bloody cold! and then stop >>> moaning about it… >>Yup. You’re like me. You catch fast if moaned to slowly;-):) >> > It does get cold here — I wear thermal underwear, and at least two >>> layers of underwear, plus a scarf. That helps… >>And to think, *it is full summer* where you live!!!;-) > It hasn’t been much of a summer here, in this part of the world.
I winder if this means our summer time will follow the same pattern. But then, your end of the world had it ever so so hard not long ago…. Where the entire planetary ground was more than just shaken… Telluric energy line must completely be changed…. Hey, you might wanna have a look at Cayce again and see which places he had said would be affected by seisms before/during the pole switches… I think eh said that it woudl be in such a seism that an Island woudl resurface and that that Island would be the lost Atlantis…But rather, I;d like to read what part of the world he had said woudl be affected by land slides and earthwuakes and so on, in these days, and check out how far off/on he was…. > It is hot today but over the official holiday period it’s been wet and cool, > sometimes cold as in winter like coldness. Tourists have missed out on a > kiwi summer… same for a lot of kiwis too on their holiday.
Do poeple there refer to themselves as "Kiwis"? Or is it just something that (some) tourists call them…? >>Imagine you’d be in winter, now…? Sheesh!;-):):) >>Must be hard to walk with 6 thermal underwears…Even more so when wearing >>them!:) >><having flashes of some super bundled team of players having a volleyball >>game, wearing a full lenght snow suit (each, hopefully…) to cover the 6 >>layers of Long John’s… >>Wonder if they’d have to do slow motion for the replays….?;-);-):):) > Nah, I don’t wear thermal underwear while playing volleyball – as I’ll > be sweating 1/2 through a game/etc. I put them back on hours afterwards.
Here, as uch as you try and shower and dry tyourself after such an indoors sports in winter, or asmuch as you even try and skip the shower to not get even more wet/damp and ehad for home to have your shower there, as you woudl alk out of that gym in weather like e have since weeks, your hair woudl be frozen into ice just from the dampness of the sweat, and still if it was dripping wet, the whole water contents woud freeze solid instantly. I see it happen each day with my own hair. Got to be careful to then not touch it, as it actually might break like an icecicle, and leave you with a blad spot or shorter hair on one spot;-). As well, your nostrils DO glue together just from the hmidity contents of your own body, as you breath. Compare it to sticking your tongue on a railroad track in winter. Save that this time, you wish a train was comign to and it faster;-) Fortunately, thse severe colds only last a sdhort while. Usually two weeks. But "usually" is an odd average. Again, two years ago, it lasted 12 weeks, and had started in late January, after everyoen thought we’d have a record early spring. I also remember that the year my dad passed away, in Florida, we’d tell him on the phoen to not come back right away, that it still was 40 below here (sic). It was April 27 when he died. Almost May. nd I remember it was fourty below all right…I had no heating at all that year. Man, what awful winters those were… I remember other years when it lasted ""only"" six weeks but would be record colds, colder than ever. A normal winter here is "supposed" to be two straight weeks of weather in the 40 belows, with the occasional day at 50 below, from mid-end of January to beginging of February. This area is also known to be the most humid oen in Canada, and by far. Only, we were so used to it that we did not find it humid ourselves…Until the climate changes that started around ‘95. Man, what awful humidity levels. 95 was a summer with 100 percent humidity *all the time*. It woudl rain? No difference, it woudl remain 100 pecent humidity just the same! No one had airco in Canada then save Amerian restaurant chains and shoppign centres. That year, in June, airco was backorder until end of October…. It never went away since….It is as if the humidity levels tripled. I noticed many types of trees that never coudl grow here when I was a kid now propagating like bad weeds, and even eating our foests away, choking other trees. Exactly like bad weed…Animals are also lost at times… Bears not hibenating yet in Late December and coming in the cities to try and find food, scne all is covered in snow…Two years ago they ahd to kill many of them: they would shoot them with anesthetics, have them removed and taken firther n the national park, after marking them. But they coudl see the same ones would comeback, poor things, hungry like mad and going for garbage cans… I saw a fox not two weeks ago on some downtown bridge. This is never good. Means possible rabbies epidemic of major importance this spring… I gues the rain, as iced as it wsa, made them think it was spring time arriving…My own tyrtle did not prepare for hibernation as she usually did, and nwo comes out of hibernation each two three days, which I am sure must affect her entre metabolism…. Some birds known to fly south in winter I saw staying now….Maybe half of them would stay on some years… The same, I had noticed that big black crows had completely vanished since a decade or two and that no oen seemed to notice. In the last years, I saw them reapear. Even in winter! Crows used to be what woudl let us know spring was coming as they all flew South in winter…. We had a few years of the weather being milder in witner, if we no longer had springs anymore (cold and rainy until June 23 or so the last years, save last eyar which was a nice normal childhood dream like spring:), wit a completely rotten wet summer) . I guess the few mild springs, where three eyars ago it was 100 F on March 1 nd never went lower, summer being 114 and up, plus awful humidex (sic) making it in the 120s:(, The mild springs made the birds be lost as to "shoud we leave or stay?" All in all, I don’t think it is a compass they have in their brain so much as a thermometer up their rear end;-). When the wind freezes your tail, you fly away from it, is what I think the entire theory is about;-). Strange changes we have…. I had lived long enough before 95 to know tht weather was not supposed to change patterns *that* fast. I amglad I was born in better weather days… I ust say that our winters, for the snow falls, and the lenght of time we have snw on the ground, are extremely shorter. It is more like their slowly stretchign over spring, no snow by May in any case:), though I remember snow falls on June 18 of 12 inches (sic) one childhood year, just on time for my summer chool break, bleh:). But our springs now usually are unexistent, and cold rains replaced them from sme time betweenthe end of snow falls till June 21-23, where it suddenly switches from 50 F o 114 plus humidex and stays humid to death, dripping wet humid, where even your clthes in your closet you can wring water out of, no kidding. Donme it for real. You get out of the shower and never dry. I once at in front fo a strong commercial fan I bought to try and dry after a shwer. Sittign right in front of it with wind so strong the furniture almost moved;-). And I still NEVER dried, as the air it threw on me was filled with humidity. It even "rained" in my basement. A very very high humidity n there condensing one evening, and making it be mist ion the basement!! Odd weather changes indeed. El Nino my smurf-o!;-) Anyway. Time to wake up….. (and smell the ice sculptures, hehehe. Winterlude shoudl be on … read more »
Response:
Your Name Here=Harvey (k…@ing.notin.aus) writes: – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -> In article <css31d$jn…@theodyn.ncf.ca>, bc…@FreeNet.Carleton.CA says… >>I’d like to bring one of them philosophers over here and sit them on a >>snow bank (rather ice banks this year), and ask them "Is it as Cold for >>you, dear?? Is "Hot" still relative???? Can you still claim you can not say >>how cold this cold is for me right now? Fine. I will just wait till you beg >>for mercy to let you indoors. THEN you’ll be as cold as me. Or rather as >>cold as I was before I got in. Or was it me that got indoors, since I am >>no the same one as the one who was cold just before outdoors for having >>lived another fraction in time? Maybe it ainlt me. Maybe you’ll knock at >>the wrong door. Maybe I just wonlt be there anymore to open. Someone new >>will look at you and not open for not knowing you, cause you wonlt be the >>same you as the you the oen that n longer is me knew or thought she knew >>in her illusion of reality out there in the hot-cold. >>C > Cold is relative.
Gngngn….;-) Not in Gateau. The city plow rolled the last philosopher to the snow blower, yesterday… The crowd was deliriously happy, and "Relative *this*!!" fused from everywhere… > If you’re hungry and hadn’t much to eat at all – the cold will get to you. > If you’ve played a good two hours of volleyball in which you enjoyed > yourself, your body temperature will be up, and your biological processes > in a heightened state of awareness – you’ll be OK for another two hours > in spite of the cold.
And then die automatically as your nostrils and lips glue together on your way back home. That is, two feet from the gym doors…;-) > I guess that’s why I look forward to playing a lot of volleyball during > winter – to chase those blues away…
Good for you, your Warmthness!:) Just be sure to shove vaseline up your nose and on your lips before you leave the gym….;-) > > I guess it’s a case of acknowledging it’s bloody cold! and then stop > moaning about it…
Yup. You’re like me. You catch fast if moaned to slowly;-):) > It does get cold here — I wear thermal underwear, and at least two > layers of underwear, plus a scarf. That helps…
And to think, *it is full summer* where you live!!!;-) Imagine you’d be in winter, now…? Sheesh!;-):):) Must be hard to walk with 6 thermal underwears…Even more so when wearing them!:) <having flashes of some super bundled team of players having a volleyball game, wearing a full lenght snow suit (each, hopefully…) to cover the 6 layers of Long John’s… Wonder if they’d have to do slow motion for the replays….?;-);-):):) 
P.S.: How do you think we invented hockey??;-) We found the frozen head of a philosopher, and tried to kick it in the snow blower’s "mouth", what else!;-) C > > Harvey —
Response:
I’d like to bring one of them philosophers over here and sit them on a snow bank (rather ice banks this year), and ask them "Is it as Cold for you, dear?? Is "Hot" still relative???? Can you still claim you can not say how cold this cold is for me right now? Fine. I will just wait till you beg for mercy to let you indoors. THEN you’ll be as cold as me. Or rather as cold as I was before I got in. Or was it me that got indoors, since I am no the same one as the one who was cold just before outdoors for having lived another fraction in time? Maybe it ainlt me. Maybe you’ll knock at the wrong door. Maybe I just wonlt be there anymore to open. Someone new will look at you and not open for not knowing you, cause you wonlt be the same you as the you the oen that n longer is me knew or thought she knew in her illusion of reality out there in the hot-cold. C —
Response:
In article <css31d$jn…@theodyn.ncf.ca>, bc…@FreeNet.Carleton.CA says… – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text ->I’d like to bring one of them philosophers over here and sit them on a >snow bank (rather ice banks this year), and ask them "Is it as Cold for >you, dear?? Is "Hot" still relative???? Can you still claim you can not say >how cold this cold is for me right now? Fine. I will just wait till you beg >for mercy to let you indoors. THEN you’ll be as cold as me. Or rather as >cold as I was before I got in. Or was it me that got indoors, since I am >no the same one as the one who was cold just before outdoors for having >lived another fraction in time? Maybe it ainlt me. Maybe you’ll knock at >the wrong door. Maybe I just wonlt be there anymore to open. Someone new >will look at you and not open for not knowing you, cause you wonlt be the >same you as the you the oen that n longer is me knew or thought she knew >in her illusion of reality out there in the hot-cold. >C
Cold is relative. If you’re hungry and hadn’t much to eat at all – the cold will get to you. If you’ve played a good two hours of volleyball in which you enjoyed yourself, your body temperature will be up, and your biological processes in a heightened state of awareness – you’ll be OK for another two hours in spite of the cold. I guess that’s why I look forward to playing a lot of volleyball during winter – to chase those blues away… I guess it’s a case of acknowledging it’s bloody cold! and then stop moaning about it… It does get cold here — I wear thermal underwear, and at least two layers of underwear, plus a scarf. That helps… Harvey
Response:
Put a prong collar with a six-foot leash on the dog. Don’t forget to put the muzzle on the dog. I think a prong works better than a choke with less chance of injury to the dog in this situation. Have the dog in a sit-stay next to you with most of the slack out of the leash and let the cat walk through the room and up to the dog if it wishes (this is why you have the dog muzzled). If the dog makes an aggressive move towards the cat, it must be corrected strongly with both your voice and the collar. This is important – the correction must be physically very strong – not a nag. (PS: not many dogs need to be corrected at all). "I worked with one shelter where I bathed and groomed every adoptable dog on intake. I frankly felt that the effort/benefit equation was not balanced for some of the older/ill poodle/terrier mixes we got in badly matted condition. Should I have refused to groom them? Or even more pertinent – I was one of the people who had to make the euthanasia decisions at that shelter." Lynn K. lyinglynn writes to a new foster care giver: For barking in the crate – leave the leash on and pass it through the crate door. Attach a line to it. When he barks, use the line for a correction. - if necessary, go to a citronella bark collar. Lynn K. 