Question:
On Fri, 3 Oct 2003 22:50:19 -0400, "Jim McGowan" <jcmcgowanATcomcastDOTnet> wrote: >I’ve been reading a lot on the apaps, Norm, including NIH studies, and I’ve >yet to come across anything resembling a statement like that. Is that an >opinion? Or does he claim it as empirical fact?
There is plenty of research based evidence to demonstrate improved compliance with the use of aPAP as opposed to CPAP and nothing to suggest anything deleterious. >Also, please remember that most xPAP scrips are written for people whose >insurance companies won’t supply aPAPs unless proven to be medically >necessary. Hence, most scrips are for CPAPs. HMO economics!
The price delta between the two is getting smaller and smaller. Here in the UK it’s down to 15% or so. I suspect that before long aPAPs will become the norm since they can typically be set to fixed pressure anyway, and economies of scale will make it more sensible for manufacturers to produce larger volumes of a smaller range of machine types. – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text ->> He went on to say that he cautions all of his patients to not experiement >with >> changing pressures, particularly these two people, who have had so many >> problems, leading to use of apap. So, obviously, I think, their problems >were >> not financial ones, but medical ones. >First, that’s not obvious at all. Presumption on your part. >Second, I don’t experiment with changing pressures. And I don’t intend to >with the aPAP. If worst comes to worst, and the software indicates that my >aPAP is varying outside of acceptable limits, I can set is to work as a >CPAP, but still get the benefit of reviewing the software and seeing if I >am having events at that pressure, or if my mask is leaking.
Exactly. If I look at my own data, on some nights there are a small number of individual central events which I am told are perfectly normal for anybody (OSA or not). These do not correspond to occasions where the machine has ramped up the pressure to handle obstructive periods. Mask leak, as you say, is also reported. I did find that it was necessary to adjust the minimum pressure up from 4 to 6cmH2O. This was necessary to provide sufficient flow while going to sleep and represented anyway the minimum requirement during the night. >My sleep doc is also a board-certified and "diplomated" neurologist who has >specialized in sleep disorders his entire career. When I mentioned the >dangers of central apnea to him he agreed that it is a concern when pressure >is to high. But he qualified that statement by saying CPAPs set to high over >an extended period are more of a concern.
Precisely. People’s needs do change over long periods and from night to night. >AutoPAPs would only spike for >very short intervals and are not a concern to him.
On mine (Autoset Spirit) the pressure is wound up quickly where required and is sloped off over about 20 minutes if there is no further apnoea or hypopnoea. If there is, then the pressure either increases again or tails off over a longer period. > He said he would be more >concerned if the AutoPAP dropped too low to stop apneas without the patient >knowing. When I mentioned that the software would point this out and >remedial action could be taken, he agreed. He said that no one ever really >looks at the data on the Smart Cards, though. I told him that he knew I >would, and he agreed (He knows me!). I also asked if he directs patients >with machines that have SmartCards to bring them in to him on any regular >basis he said no. Duh.
One of the aspects of this is that it is necessary to understnad statistical methods and look at the data over a period of time. There are variations for given patients from night to night. >I tend to agree that this is not the proper way to confirm diagnosis of a >sleep disorder, but I suspect that this is economically driven by insurance >companies. As far as malpractice, this "diplomated" neurologist has a law >degree, too? Probably, Norm, that he was just expressing his disdain for >that method of diagnosis.
Possibly, although the technology is improving all the time. The risk is of false negative diagnosis, but there is no reason in principle why additional instrumentation could not be added to such portable equipment to augment finger oximetry. >It’s in my original post, Norm. the founder of the sleep disorder center I >go to, my neurologist’s "boss" so to speak, simply doesn’t like them. When >I pressed for more detail, my doc told me they "tried a few" a few years ago >and the top doc didn’t like the pressure fluctuations and sent them back to >the manufacturer.
"Didn’t like". That’s really scientific isn’t it? >Hasn’t considered them since. Of course I know that he >doesn’t like or use cell phones, and can’t figure out why all folks don’t >"retire" at sundown and rise at dawn, like he did growing up on his family >farm. Norm, he’s well past normal retirement age and is very old-fashioned >and conservative in his ways.
… and therefore should no longer be practicing (he should get it right
) >And…..of course, while this wasn’t >mentioned, if AutoPAPs with close software monitoring can "auto-titrate" >patients, he may not be able to keep his ten bed facility at capacity!
Now we have the real reason. >Norm, He is a diplomated sleep doc also. He apparently is not free to offer >me that help as long as the center is run by its founder, who just doesn’t >want to use AutoPAPs. And treatment of sleep apnea itself is a very >complicated issue. Yet you use that technology, not knowing at all if your >pressure is the optimal pressure for stopping your events without supplying >too much pressure. Most people don’t have apneic events all night long that >are stopped by the same exact pressure. Your pressure is set so that it’s >high enough to overcome all events, but that means that it is almost certain >to be more pressure than you need at times. Like you said, it’s >complicated!
Exactly. Not to mention the effect over a period of time. >Very presumptuous and pompous response, Norm. And your advice is accurate >and beneficial for me? Well of course, if you say so! I’ve read your posts >in here for close to four years, Norm, and I’ve seen your views turn around >180 degress at times, as you learned or studied something more. Makes you >wrong about as much as you’re right. Of course that goes with all of us. >Does that mean that you "don’t know much about…sleep disorders, OSA, or >apap, and.." have "..no concern" about your reputation and/or liability"? >Would that be a generalization? All or nothing statement?
Precisely. If you look at any of the scientific research in this area it is interesting to note that researchers who use statistically significant numbers of patients present their results with the correct statistical qualifiers of their results and draw conclusions from those if it is possible to do so. Yet those (often in sleep clinics) who present data using small samples (I’ve seen as few as 5) present there "findings" with much more apparent authority (aka dogma). Of course this is totally bogus and is pseudo-science attempting to support a view already held. >I have all the money I need to be properly treated. However I demand a >significant input into the treatment I receive. And I never gamble.
Likewise. I have had no difficulty in asking for and getting the data and input to treatment that a require. I am fortunate in having a clinician who is not living in the dark ages. Sadly there are a majority that still are. .andy To email, substitute .nospam with .gl
Response:
Jim McGowan <jcmcgowanATcomcastDOTnet> wrote: > > He also said he considered it to be medical malpractice for Kaiser to > treat > > their patients with sleep-disorder symptoms, by sending them home with an > > autopap and finger oximeter. IMHO, this is particularly so when they have > labs > > at some of their hospitals, but have several month waiting lists. > I tend to agree that this is not the proper way to confirm diagnosis of a > sleep disorder, but I suspect that this is economically driven by insurance > companies. As far as malpractice, this "diplomated" neurologist has a law > degree, too? Probably, Norm, that he was just expressing his disdain for > that method of diagnosis.
My friend who goes to Kaiser was sent home with a polysomnograph recorder and sensors. She ’slept’ with it on overnight. This was taken back to Kaiser to have the data downloaded and read to diagnose her apnea. The autopap was sent home with her overnight only after diagnosis to determine the pressure required for CPAP. I belonged to another HMO and had my testing done the same way by an indipendent lab. The lab is booked solid for months for this type of testing. I got in a bit sooner by putting myself on the list to be called if there was a cancellation. This is not the ideal way to do it, but for many is more than adaquate. If there are problems, a more thorough test overnight in a lab can be arranged. Perfect is the enemy of good enough. I would rather have this procedure than have a much longer wait to get a ‘perfect’ test done. Also, given the limited capacity of lab beds, how many would go untested and untreated for how long? Ross Bernheim
Response:
Hi Norm! Haven’t been here in a while, but I see you’re still very active here. Some responses/explanations to your concerns inserted below: "NormC" <no…@socal.rr.com> rambled along in message news:3F7DF44D.3080101@socal.rr.com… [snipped where appropriate] > Earlier in the week, my wife and I had a chance to talk with him for 50 minutes. > He’s been diplomated for ~13 years and has been with Pacific Sleep Medicine all > that time. > He says that apaps do not work for most people, because the brain does not > expect changing conditions. The brain works better without such changes. I > know this leaves a lot of questions, but it’s a starting place, keeping in mind > that he is a neurologist.
I’ve been reading a lot on the apaps, Norm, including NIH studies, and I’ve yet to come across anything resembling a statement like that. Is that an opinion? Or does he claim it as empirical fact? > It is interesting to note that two, and only two, of his patients use apaps. I > asked if he had written the script for them. He said yes. I asked him why, and > he reponded, "Because they seem to work with those two people."
Also, please remember that most xPAP scrips are written for people whose insurance companies won’t supply aPAPs unless proven to be medically necessary. Hence, most scrips are for CPAPs. HMO economics! > He went on to say that he cautions all of his patients to not experiement with > changing pressures, particularly these two people, who have had so many > problems, leading to use of apap. So, obviously, I think, their problems were > not financial ones, but medical ones.
First, that’s not obvious at all. Presumption on your part. Second, I don’t experiment with changing pressures. And I don’t intend to with the aPAP. If worst comes to worst, and the software indicates that my aPAP is varying outside of acceptable limits, I can set is to work as a CPAP, but still get the benefit of reviewing the software and seeing if I am having events at that pressure, or if my mask is leaking. > One of the problems that could occur are central apenas. I might mention that > he has never used the term ‘central apnea’, even when I tried an autopap and > finger oximeter to try to dianose my continuing problems, and my O2 dropped to > low levels, while my pressure remained at the laboratory, manually titrated > level. Instead he uses the term "neurological sleep disorder". > When I went on to talk about this subject (central apnea and neurological sleep > disorder), he started using the term "intermittent breathing". I googled this > term and found more than I wanted to read about it.
My sleep doc is also a board-certified and "diplomated" neurologist who has specialized in sleep disorders his entire career. When I mentioned the dangers of central apnea to him he agreed that it is a concern when pressure is to high. But he qualified that statement by saying CPAPs set to high over an extended period are more of a concern. AutoPAPs would only spike for very short intervals and are not a concern to him. He said he would be more concerned if the AutoPAP dropped too low to stop apneas without the patient knowing. When I mentioned that the software would point this out and remedial action could be taken, he agreed. He said that no one ever really looks at the data on the Smart Cards, though. I told him that he knew I would, and he agreed (He knows me!). I also asked if he directs patients with machines that have SmartCards to bring them in to him on any regular basis he said no. Duh. Of course if you read otherwise in Google, well, then all his education is out the window! > He also said he considered it to be medical malpractice for Kaiser to treat > their patients with sleep-disorder symptoms, by sending them home with an > autopap and finger oximeter. IMHO, this is particularly so when they have labs > at some of their hospitals, but have several month waiting lists.
I tend to agree that this is not the proper way to confirm diagnosis of a sleep disorder, but I suspect that this is economically driven by insurance companies. As far as malpractice, this "diplomated" neurologist has a law degree, too? Probably, Norm, that he was just expressing his disdain for that method of diagnosis. > > They’d much > > prefer I just keep shelling out for retitrations whenever they require > > (which is averaging once yearly!). > I don’t understand this. Why once a year? Since you are paying for it, why do > you do it once a year? I could understand getting a PSG every year, but not > another titration, unless there was some specific reason to do so. > I have had a number of problems that have been worked out without returning to > the lab, for three years. I just another PSG a couple weeks ago.
Not actually once a year. Perhaps I didn’t state that as clearly as I will now. I’ve had a total of five polysomnograms in the four years since my diagnosis: the original test, the follow-up titration, and then three titrations since. Reasons? The first two are obvious: confirm OSA, then find the optimal pressure setting to control it. Twice more because I was still symptomatic even on the pressure determined by titration. Once because of three back surgeries in three weeks (First one planned; next two because of an "oops" during the first one), I lost 28 pounds and didn’t require as much pressure. I’ve averaged one a year, but not one every year. > Have you ever asked them why they don’t want to prescribe autopaps?
It’s in my original post, Norm. the founder of the sleep disorder center I go to, my neurologist’s "boss" so to speak, simply doesn’t like them. When I pressed for more detail, my doc told me they "tried a few" a few years ago and the top doc didn’t like the pressure fluctuations and sent them back to the manufacturer. Hasn’t considered them since. Of course I know that he doesn’t like or use cell phones, and can’t figure out why all folks don’t "retire" at sundown and rise at dawn, like he did growing up on his family farm. Norm, he’s well past normal retirement age and is very old-fashioned and conservative in his ways. And…..of course, while this wasn’t mentioned, if AutoPAPs with close software monitoring can "auto-titrate" patients, he may not be able to keep his ten bed facility at capacity! > > Since I’m paying on my own, I’d much rather use the autoPAP. Even if the > > auto-adjust feature turns out to be not as reliable as they’d like, I could > > avoid the continual re-tites by setting a tight range right around where my > > CPAP is set and then monitor the software for events, leaks, etc. > As long as you understand the potential hazards of doing this, do it. But I > would be concerned, about not having a diplomated sleep doc helping you to see > if you might be one of the few that apap helps. It’s a very complicated issue, > The medical community knows less about the brain than any other organ of
the body. Norm, He is a diplomated sleep doc also. He apparently is not free to offer me that help as long as the center is run by its founder, who just doesn’t want to use AutoPAPs. And treatment of sleep apnea itself is a very complicated issue. Yet you use that technology, not knowing at all if your pressure is the optimal pressure for stopping your events without supplying too much pressure. Most people don’t have apneic events all night long that are stopped by the same exact pressure. Your pressure is set so that it’s high enough to overcome all events, but that means that it is almost certain to be more pressure than you need at times. Like you said, it’s complicated! > > I’ll have to find a way to get an Rx elsewhere, I guess. > The best way to do that is find a doctor who doesn’t know much about the brain, > sleep-disorders, OSA, or apap, and has no concern about his reputation and/or > liability.
Very presumptuous and pompous response, Norm. And your advice is accurate and beneficial for me? Well of course, if you say so! I’ve read your posts in here for close to four years, Norm, and I’ve seen your views turn around 180 degress at times, as you learned or studied something more. Makes you wrong about as much as you’re right. Of course that goes with all of us. Does that mean that you "don’t know much about…sleep disorders, OSA, or apap, and.." have "..no concern" about your reputation and/or liability"? Would that be a generalization? All or nothing statement? > The one good thing about doing this is that if you have any severe problems, you > can sue him for malpractice.
Ahh, sarcasm….gets you by all the time Norm, if you don’t happen to agree. One of the things I like about you! > Bottom line: If you really don’t have the money to be properly treated, do it. > If you want to save money to spend elsewhere, then you might want to consider > whether it’s worth the gamble.
I have all the money I need to be properly treated. However I demand a significant input into the treatment I receive. And I never gamble. Can you say the same, Norm? Truthfully? :-) Best regards, Jim McGowan
Response:
- Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -In article <3F7DF44D.3080…@socal.rr.com>, NormC wrote: > Jim McGowan wrote: >> Since I’m paying on my own, I’d much rather use the autoPAP. Even if the >> auto-adjust feature turns out to be not as reliable as they’d like, I could >> avoid the continual re-tites by setting a tight range right around where my >> CPAP is set and then monitor the software for events, leaks, etc. > As long as you understand the potential hazards of doing this, do it. But I > would be concerned, about not having a diplomated sleep doc helping you to see > if you might be one of the few that apap helps. It’s a very complicated issue, > The medical community knows less about the brain than any other organ of the body. >> I’ll have to find a way to get an Rx elsewhere, I guess. > The best way to do that is find a doctor who doesn’t know much about the brain, > sleep-disorders, OSA, or apap, and has no concern about his reputation and/or > liability. > The one good thing about doing this is that if you have any severe problems, you > can sue him for malpractice.
Prescribing an autopap is "malpractice"? That’s a rather extreme view. I wouldn’t be so quick to assume the general medical community is wrong about prescribing autopaps.
Response:
- Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -On Fri, 03 Oct 2003 22:11:55 GMT, NormC <no…@socal.rr.com> wrote: >Jim McGowan wrote: >> Thanks for the info, Thumper and Charles! >> I did find out that the Smart Card is basically a SmartMedia card, but with >> a proprietary algorhythm embedded which makes it readable only by the >> Respironics reader. >> Just thought I’d try to save a little $ if I could. >> As it turns out, my sleep doc doesn’t want to prescribe the autoPAP – the >> founder of the sleep center here "just doesn’t like them". >Ditto for my neurologist diplomated sleep doc. Don’t know about the rest of his >organization http://www.pacificsleepmedicine.com/ >Earlier in the week, my wife and I had a chance to talk with him for 50 minutes. > One of the things we talked about was apaps and their use. I didn’t take >notes, but I can remember a couple things he said, that may be of interest. >This is in addition to other things he’s told me and that I’ve posted in the past. >He’s been diplomated for ~13 years and has been with Pacific Sleep Medicine all >that time. He teaches sleep medicine at UCLA. One of his students was the >doctor who is the head of the London, England hospital containing a 3-bed sleep >clinic. >He says that apaps do not work for most people, because the brain does not >expect changing conditions.
Unfortunately he is either wrong or being misleading, because a) they do and b) I could reference at least one eminent neurologist and another equally eminent pulmonologist who would say the opposite. > The brain works better without such changes. I >know this leaves a lot of questions, but it’s a starting place, keeping in mind >that he is a neurologist. >It is interesting to note that two, and only two, of his patients use apaps. I >asked if he had written the script for them. He said yes. I asked him why, and >he reponded, "Because they seem to work with those two people."
That’s a somewhat thin explanation. >He went on to say that he cautions all of his patients to not experiement with >changing pressures, particularly these two people, who have had so many >problems, leading to use of apap. So, obviously, I think, their problems were >not financial ones, but medical ones.
Hmmmm….. >One of the problems that could occur are central apenas.
Possibly in the case of excessive pressure. However, for most people there will be sleeping positions where the pressure requirement is less. There are also diurnal pressure change requirements as well as those resulting from weight change in some patients. Logically, a fixed pressure machine is going to be producing excessive pressure for some of the time, so if that it considered to be acceptable treatment without central apnoea risk, it does not make sense to suggest that an automatically adjusting machine which adjusts to meet pressure requirements will be more likely to induce central apnoeas. I have never found any papers supporting this from real research with a statistically significant number of patients in blind trials; only hearsay from those with a commercial clinical interest. They probably went to the same medical school as those still advocating ritual genital mutilation of infant boys and attempt to justify a position based on hearsay and common practice rather than sound scientific evidence. > I might mention that >he has never used the term ‘central apnea’, even when I tried an autopap and >finger oximeter to try to dianose my continuing problems, and my O2 dropped to >low levels, while my pressure remained at the laboratory, manually titrated >level. Instead he uses the term "neurological sleep disorder". >When I went on to talk about this subject (central apnea and neurological sleep >disorder), he started using the term "intermittent breathing". I googled this >term and found more than I wanted to read about it. >He also said he considered it to be medical malpractice for Kaiser to treat >their patients with sleep-disorder symptoms, by sending them home with an >autopap and finger oximeter.
Possibly, and of course there is no commercial interest either way? > IMHO, this is particularly so when they have labs >at some of their hospitals, but have several month waiting lists. >> They’d much >> prefer I just keep shelling out for retitrations whenever they require >> (which is averaging once yearly!). >I don’t understand this. Why once a year? Since you are paying for it, why do >you do it once a year? I could understand getting a PSG every year, but not >another titration, unless there was some specific reason to do so.
Weight changes and numerous other factors, not to mention a nice revenue stream for the clinic……. >I have had a number of problems that have been worked out without returning to >the lab, for three years. I just another PSG a couple weeks ago. >Have you ever asked them why they don’t want to prescribe autopaps?
I think that that is self evident. Repeat visits to retitrate patients and adjust a fixed machine aids profitability of clinics. >> Since I’m paying on my own, I’d much rather use the autoPAP. Even if the >> auto-adjust feature turns out to be not as reliable as they’d like, I could >> avoid the continual re-tites by setting a tight range right around where my >> CPAP is set and then monitor the software for events, leaks, etc. >As long as you understand the potential hazards of doing this, do it. But I >would be concerned, about not having a diplomated sleep doc helping you to see >if you might be one of the few that apap helps.
This appears to be one area where your clinician is behind the rest of the world. There is plenty of research and government guideline supporting APAP use… http://www.guideline.gov/summary/summary.aspx?doc_id=3181 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&… http://ajrccm.atsjournals.org/cgi/content/short/200201-022OCv1 > It’s a very complicated issue, > The medical community knows less about the brain than any other organ of the body. >> I’ll have to find a way to get an Rx elsewhere, I guess. >The best way to do that is find a doctor who doesn’t know much about the brain, >sleep-disorders, OSA, or apap, and has no concern about his reputation and/or >liability. >The one good thing about doing this is that if you have any severe problems, you >can sue him for malpractice.
Great idea. It never ceases to amaze me how in most U.S. cities the largest letter section in Yellow Pages is ‘A’ for attorney. >Bottom line: If you really don’t have the money to be properly treated, do it. > If you want to save money to spend elsewhere, then you might want to consider >whether it’s worth the gamble.
Probably less of a gamble than getting involved with medical practice that is not keeping up with current trends….. >HTH
.andy To email, substitute .nospam with .gl
Response:
- Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -In article <Np2cnRaE0LYdP-aiXTW…@comcast.com>, Jim McGowan wrote: > As it turns out, my sleep doc doesn’t want to prescribe the autoPAP – the > founder of the sleep center here "just doesn’t like them". They’d much > prefer I just keep shelling out for retitrations whenever they require > (which is averaging once yearly!). > Since I’m paying on my own, I’d much rather use the autoPAP. Even if the > auto-adjust feature turns out to be not as reliable as they’d like, I could > avoid the continual re-tites by setting a tight range right around where my > CPAP is set and then monitor the software for events, leaks, etc. > I’ll have to find a way to get an Rx elsewhere, I guess. > Thanks again, > Jim McGowan
I got an autopap prescription from my primary doctor after my sleep doc was stubborn about it. I asked my primary doctor for one when I was seeing him about something else. He already had copies of my titration report.
Response:
Jim McGowan wrote: > Thanks for the info, Thumper and Charles! > I did find out that the Smart Card is basically a SmartMedia card, but with > a proprietary algorhythm embedded which makes it readable only by the > Respironics reader. > Just thought I’d try to save a little $ if I could. > As it turns out, my sleep doc doesn’t want to prescribe the autoPAP – the > founder of the sleep center here "just doesn’t like them".
Ditto for my neurologist diplomated sleep doc. Don’t know about the rest of his organization http://www.pacificsleepmedicine.com/ Earlier in the week, my wife and I had a chance to talk with him for 50 minutes. One of the things we talked about was apaps and their use. I didn’t take notes, but I can remember a couple things he said, that may be of interest. This is in addition to other things he’s told me and that I’ve posted in the past. He’s been diplomated for ~13 years and has been with Pacific Sleep Medicine all that time. He teaches sleep medicine at UCLA. One of his students was the doctor who is the head of the London, England hospital containing a 3-bed sleep clinic. He says that apaps do not work for most people, because the brain does not expect changing conditions. The brain works better without such changes. I know this leaves a lot of questions, but it’s a starting place, keeping in mind that he is a neurologist. It is interesting to note that two, and only two, of his patients use apaps. I asked if he had written the script for them. He said yes. I asked him why, and he reponded, "Because they seem to work with those two people." He went on to say that he cautions all of his patients to not experiement with changing pressures, particularly these two people, who have had so many problems, leading to use of apap. So, obviously, I think, their problems were not financial ones, but medical ones. One of the problems that could occur are central apenas. I might mention that he has never used the term ‘central apnea’, even when I tried an autopap and finger oximeter to try to dianose my continuing problems, and my O2 dropped to low levels, while my pressure remained at the laboratory, manually titrated level. Instead he uses the term "neurological sleep disorder". When I went on to talk about this subject (central apnea and neurological sleep disorder), he started using the term "intermittent breathing". I googled this term and found more than I wanted to read about it. He also said he considered it to be medical malpractice for Kaiser to treat their patients with sleep-disorder symptoms, by sending them home with an autopap and finger oximeter. IMHO, this is particularly so when they have labs at some of their hospitals, but have several month waiting lists. > They’d much > prefer I just keep shelling out for retitrations whenever they require > (which is averaging once yearly!).
I don’t understand this. Why once a year? Since you are paying for it, why do you do it once a year? I could understand getting a PSG every year, but not another titration, unless there was some specific reason to do so. I have had a number of problems that have been worked out without returning to the lab, for three years. I just another PSG a couple weeks ago. Have you ever asked them why they don’t want to prescribe autopaps? > Since I’m paying on my own, I’d much rather use the autoPAP. Even if the > auto-adjust feature turns out to be not as reliable as they’d like, I could > avoid the continual re-tites by setting a tight range right around where my > CPAP is set and then monitor the software for events, leaks, etc.
As long as you understand the potential hazards of doing this, do it. But I would be concerned, about not having a diplomated sleep doc helping you to see if you might be one of the few that apap helps. It’s a very complicated issue, The medical community knows less about the brain than any other organ of the body. > I’ll have to find a way to get an Rx elsewhere, I guess.
The best way to do that is find a doctor who doesn’t know much about the brain, sleep-disorders, OSA, or apap, and has no concern about his reputation and/or liability. The one good thing about doing this is that if you have any severe problems, you can sue him for malpractice. Bottom line: If you really don’t have the money to be properly treated, do it. If you want to save money to spend elsewhere, then you might want to consider whether it’s worth the gamble. HTH – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -> Thanks again, > Jim McGowan > "Charles Perrin" <c.l.perrin…@att.net> wrote in message > news:62uhnv0iqsbkftf5l6iubl2fe0nfbo3jdn@4ax.com… >>On 29 Sep 2003 07:52:16 -0700, Jim McGowan wrote: >>>I’m about to buy a RemStar Auto and the software. >>>Does anyone here know if: >>>1) The Smart Card is a SmartMedia card? >>After looking at a picture of the RemStar Smart Card, it’s exactly >>what they say: A Smart Card (ISO 7816 compliant). >>SmartMedia has a LOT more pins on it than a Smart Card. Smart Cards >>use the familiar credit card form factor. >>Other examples of Smart Cards that are out there are American Express >>Blue and Target Visa. >>>2) It’s readable by a standard SmartMedia reader? >>The real question is: "Is it readable by an Amex Blue or a Target Visa >>reader?" >>You can get those free if you sign up for the credit card, which >>undoubtedly beats Respironics’ prices. >>– >>Offshore a CEO: buy an ADR!
Response:
On 29 Sep 2003 07:52:16 -0700, Jim McGowan wrote: >I’m about to buy a RemStar Auto and the software. >Does anyone here know if: >1) The Smart Card is a SmartMedia card?
After looking at a picture of the RemStar Smart Card, it’s exactly what they say: A Smart Card (ISO 7816 compliant). SmartMedia has a LOT more pins on it than a Smart Card. Smart Cards use the familiar credit card form factor. Other examples of Smart Cards that are out there are American Express Blue and Target Visa. >2) It’s readable by a standard SmartMedia reader?
The real question is: "Is it readable by an Amex Blue or a Target Visa reader?" You can get those free if you sign up for the credit card, which undoubtedly beats Respironics’ prices. — Offshore a CEO: buy an ADR!
Response:
Thanks for the info, Thumper and Charles! I did find out that the Smart Card is basically a SmartMedia card, but with a proprietary algorhythm embedded which makes it readable only by the Respironics reader. Just thought I’d try to save a little $ if I could. As it turns out, my sleep doc doesn’t want to prescribe the autoPAP – the founder of the sleep center here "just doesn’t like them". They’d much prefer I just keep shelling out for retitrations whenever they require (which is averaging once yearly!). Since I’m paying on my own, I’d much rather use the autoPAP. Even if the auto-adjust feature turns out to be not as reliable as they’d like, I could avoid the continual re-tites by setting a tight range right around where my CPAP is set and then monitor the software for events, leaks, etc. I’ll have to find a way to get an Rx elsewhere, I guess. Thanks again, Jim McGowan "Charles Perrin" <c.l.perrin…@att.net> wrote in message
news:62uhnv0iqsbkftf5l6iubl2fe0nfbo3jdn@4ax.com… – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -> On 29 Sep 2003 07:52:16 -0700, Jim McGowan wrote: > >I’m about to buy a RemStar Auto and the software. > >Does anyone here know if: > >1) The Smart Card is a SmartMedia card? > After looking at a picture of the RemStar Smart Card, it’s exactly > what they say: A Smart Card (ISO 7816 compliant). > SmartMedia has a LOT more pins on it than a Smart Card. Smart Cards > use the familiar credit card form factor. > Other examples of Smart Cards that are out there are American Express > Blue and Target Visa. > >2) It’s readable by a standard SmartMedia reader? > The real question is: "Is it readable by an Amex Blue or a Target Visa > reader?" > You can get those free if you sign up for the credit card, which > undoubtedly beats Respironics’ prices. > — > Offshore a CEO: buy an ADR!
Response:
On Wed, 1 Oct 2003 23:58:47 -0400, "Jim McGowan" <jcmcgowanATcomcastDOTnet> wrote: >Thanks for the info, Thumper and Charles! >I did find out that the Smart Card is basically a SmartMedia card, but with >a proprietary algorhythm embedded which makes it readable only by the >Respironics reader. >Just thought I’d try to save a little $ if I could. >As it turns out, my sleep doc doesn’t want to prescribe the autoPAP – the >founder of the sleep center here "just doesn’t like them". They’d much >prefer I just keep shelling out for retitrations whenever they require >(which is averaging once yearly!).
I bet they would. This really is a con. According to my consultant, there are people for whom regular manual titration and fixed pressure equipment is indicated, but for the vast majority, automatic equipment is very effective. He also indicated that the sleep study results followed by a few days aPAP treatment are able to determine which patients require treatment each way. >Since I’m paying on my own, I’d much rather use the autoPAP. Even if the >auto-adjust feature turns out to be not as reliable as they’d like, I could >avoid the continual re-tites by setting a tight range right around where my >CPAP is set and then monitor the software for events, leaks, etc.
From the machine data I find that I need a maximum pressure of 12-13 cmH2O, although that is for short term peaks which might happen 3-4 times per night. The median is normally around 7-8 and 95th percentile 10-11. The minimum is set to 6. However, these figures do vary quite a bit from night to night, and seem to be influenced by sleeping position among other factors. It is possible to set the machine (Resmed Spirit) to cPAP mode as well, but considering the variations in required pressure, this would not make sense. >I’ll have to find a way to get an Rx elsewhere, I guess. >Thanks again, >Jim McGowan
.andy To email, substitute .nospam with .gl
Response:
Thanks for the info, Andy. I think I’m entitled to make the decision on aPAP. It’s not like he’s restricted by insurance coverage rules since I’m buying. I already know from my previous titrations that I have more and varying length events in different positions. His response is to always try to go to sleep on my right side! And Carl, that’s a really great idea. I think I’ll ask my primary doc if he’ll write me a scrip. Thanks much, Jim McGowan "Andy Hall" <an…@hall.nospam> wrote in message
news:cginnvk7ip2kh6hcjvvh2nkbo0felu63sv@4ax.com… – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -> On Wed, 1 Oct 2003 23:58:47 -0400, "Jim McGowan" > <jcmcgowanATcomcastDOTnet> wrote: > >Thanks for the info, Thumper and Charles! > >I did find out that the Smart Card is basically a SmartMedia card, but with > >a proprietary algorhythm embedded which makes it readable only by the > >Respironics reader. > >Just thought I’d try to save a little $ if I could. > >As it turns out, my sleep doc doesn’t want to prescribe the autoPAP – the > >founder of the sleep center here "just doesn’t like them". They’d much > >prefer I just keep shelling out for retitrations whenever they require > >(which is averaging once yearly!). > I bet they would. This really is a con. According to my > consultant, there are people for whom regular manual titration and > fixed pressure equipment is indicated, but for the vast majority, > automatic equipment is very effective. He also indicated that the > sleep study results followed by a few days aPAP treatment are able to > determine which patients require treatment each way. > >Since I’m paying on my own, I’d much rather use the autoPAP. Even if the > >auto-adjust feature turns out to be not as reliable as they’d like, I could > >avoid the continual re-tites by setting a tight range right around where my > >CPAP is set and then monitor the software for events, leaks, etc. > From the machine data I find that I need a maximum pressure of 12-13 > cmH2O, although that is for short term peaks which might happen 3-4 > times per night. The median is normally around 7-8 and 95th percentile > 10-11. The minimum is set to 6. > However, these figures do vary quite a bit from night to night, and > seem to be influenced by sleeping position among other factors. > It is possible to set the machine (Resmed Spirit) to cPAP mode as > well, but considering the variations in required pressure, this would > not make sense. > >I’ll have to find a way to get an Rx elsewhere, I guess. > >Thanks again, > >Jim McGowan > .andy > To email, substitute .nospam with .gl
Response:
Hi all! Long time since I’ve been here. I’m about to buy a RemStar Auto and the software. Does anyone here know what type of media the SmartCard is? Before I shell out $ for the Respironics Reader, I want to know if the card can be read in a standard media reader. I have readers already for SmartMedia (SM), Compact Flash (CF), Secure Digital (SD), MultiMedia Card (MMC), and Memory Stick. A call to Respironics brought me a litany of "I don’t know"s. I finally got a tech to say it’s a SmartMedia card, he believes. Does anyone here know if: 1) The Smart Card is a SmartMedia card? 2) It’s readable by a standard SmartMedia reader? Thanks in advance for all help! Jim McGowan
Response:
Jim, The card is proprietary and although I tried to do the same, could not find a generic alternative. I have the reader and software for my RemstarAuto and am very happy with both. The reporting is incredible, but the bad thing is, the software transfers the data to your computer, leaving the card empty. So if your Dr wants to read the card, it will be incomplete. I’ve found it easiest just to bring a hard copy of the report. It would be nice if you had the option to just read the card instead of reading and erasing. However, you might want to try to buy the reader through cpapman whom I believe gives you a copy of the software for free. ( at least some have claimed this). Give it a shot. Good luck. "Jim McGowan" <jcmcgo…@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:9aad8fc.0309290652.64e0bddc@posting.google.com… – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -> Hi all! > Long time since I’ve been here. > I’m about to buy a RemStar Auto and the software. > Does anyone here know what type of media the SmartCard is? Before I > shell out $ for the Respironics Reader, I want to know if the card can > be read in a standard media reader. I have readers already for > SmartMedia (SM), Compact Flash (CF), Secure Digital (SD), MultiMedia > Card (MMC), and Memory Stick. > A call to Respironics brought me a litany of "I don’t know"s. I > finally got a tech to say it’s a SmartMedia card, he believes. > Does anyone here know if: > 1) The Smart Card is a SmartMedia card? > 2) It’s readable by a standard SmartMedia reader? > Thanks in advance for all help! > Jim McGowan
Response: